Another Vandemann Lie!! Actually a number of them. But what else is new?
JP wrote:
"Ed Pirrero" wrote in message
ups.com...
Really, if you want to have discussion on the merits of a particular
course of action, it's best to leave hyperbole and name-calling out.
Mike doesn't adhere to that in the least, and cherry-picks his "facts"
as suit his conclusions. Real scientists usually refer to such things
as "junk" science.
No matter how fervently one believes in something, they are not
entitled to their own set of facts.
E.P.
I'm not trying to have a discusssion with MV, that has been proven
impossible
by many in the group including myself. My use of "invective" is simply a
mirror
of MV's responses and is directed at him for that reason.
That's fine. Can you send it directly to him, and spare the rest of
us?
Thanks.
E.P.
|