On Apr 16, 11:26*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Apr 12, 5:11*pm, Len McGoogle wrote:









On Apr 11, 10:09*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Apr 9, 10:05*am, Len McGoogle wrote:

On Apr 7, 3:41*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Apr 7, 8:24*am, Len McGoogle wrote:

On Apr 3, 11:27*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Apr 3, 6:40*pm, Len McGoogle wrote:

On Apr 3, 12:06*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...tland-17583393

Michael J. Vandeman's life suffered a serious crash when he was
arrested and put in jail.

Not really. One of the charges was dismissed & I was acquitted of the
other one. It's a good demonstration of what happens when mountain
bikers LIE, in order to punish someone who simply tells the TRUTH
about mountain biking.

For exhibiting a deadly weapon: guilty.

Thanks for demonstrating your total ignorance! The mountain biker
admitted in court that I wasn't brandishing. Innocent.

For exhibiting a deadly weapon at Emanuel Alcala: guilty.

He simply lied. Innocent.

For battering Justin Bruss: guilty.

He also lied. He ran into ME, so HE is the one guilty of battery, as
well as violating the traffic laws. Innocent. The jury were pretty
stupid. And, of course, none of them were present during the
incidents, so they are just guessing.

So why haven't YOU filed charges? Surely a sane person like yourself
would not let someone get away with assaulting them.

You really aren't smart, are you? There were no witnesses. Bruss knows
he's at fault. That is enough.

No witnesses, then how were you found guilty?

Juries think they can tell what is true & what isn't. They CAN'T. None
of them were there! DUH!

So you may have actually done more than assault someone but since the
jury wasn't there you got away with it. Thanks for clearing that up.