On Dec 13, 10:22*am, Phil H wrote:
On Dec 13, 7:04*am, "D'ohBoy" wrote:

On Dec 12, 6:30*pm, "D'ohBoy" wrote:

Hey, Andre, you don't doubt the existence of a natural phenomenon
known as "the greenhouse effect," do you?

D'ohBoy

Not afraid of some simple questions, are ya?

Wouldn't want to appear to be merely schmearing rather than putting
forth useful info would you?

D'ohBoy

You need to ask higher level questions.......what portion of climate
cycles in the past was due to variations in "the greenhouse effect?"

Phil H

Hi, Phil -

Don't care about the imponderable or incompletely supportable. Just
have some very simple questions for Mr. Jute which relate to global
warming, get to the heart of the matter, and use simple logic to
actually use Jute's arguments against him.

PLUS: the past bears little relationship to the current situation...
there is a lot that he has said that actually does call into question
the use of historical data TO THE CURRENT SITUATION. However, we
don't really need historical data for this one - well, okay, we will
use it, but not in the sense that Shuck and Jive thinks. What we need
is merely some existing quantitative data and atmospheric science.
Nothing crazy, just basic reasoning.

But it appears that Mr. Jute is ignoring me in some fashion (re-
killfiled, perhaps?). Maybe one of his minions (yo, Dumbass Bill,
you out there?) can help him out.

D'ohBoy