"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 29 May 2005 16:35:39 GMT, "Mark"
wrote:

.
."Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
.. .
. On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark"
.wrote:
.
. .
. ." .
. . . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. . . :
. . . .
. . . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
. . .interpretations.
. . . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or
how
.it
. . .should
. . . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
. .nothing
. . .but
. . . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting.
Drop
.the
. . .act.
. . . .
. . . .Done. Later.
. . . .
. . . .Ikonicus
. . . .1-202-518-1515
. . . .415-203-1513
. . .
. . . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously.
.MAYBE.
. . .
. . .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a
.history
. .of
. . .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
. . .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
. .details.
. .
. . I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
. .
. .
. .Paranoid?
. .
. .I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally ,
I
. .think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
. .personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
. .several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp
detail
. .you get from headers is telling in itself.
.
. Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.
.
.On what grounds do you make this statement?
.
.Please show, with valid data from a peer reviewed , acknowledged expert
that
.people who dont include their personal details posting to usenet are more
.dishonest than those that do.
.
.Or is that another of your 'truths' that cant be proven because they
simply
.arent true?

Yawn.

carry on.

I said you lacked either the intelligence or the data to argue any of the
points you try to put forward as fact, or that you have no credible
credentials to be called either an expert in the fireld of environmentalism,
every time you fail to respond with anything other than 'yawn' proves me
correct.

Ironic really, that in your own little world you feel you are being clever,
that this response will garner what you desire so much,an agressive and
frustrated response.

You lack either the intelligence or worth to get either from me.

All you do is reinforce my description of you, an unintelligent , uninformed
bigot with a hatred for mountain biking hiding behind the green flag of the
environment.