On 04/07/2019 23:32, JNugent wrote:
On 04/07/2019 17:30, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2019 14:32, JNugent wrote:
On 04/07/2019 13:05, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2019 12:34, MrCheerful wrote:

why was the cyclist obstructing faster moving traffic?Â* He should
have just pulled over to let the guy through, making rude gestures
and weaving around is bound to annoy someone.

One of them caused harm and broke the law. Which one was it?

It sounds as though they both broke the law.

Doesn't it?

No.

You are wrong yet again (though you know that and are just being childish).

Wilful obstruction of the highway is an offence.

There probably is such an offence but you appear to be in fantasy land.
There is no suggestion that Her Majesty found him guilty of such an
offence. You're justifying a criminal's actions again.