On Jun 1, 12:19*am, PhilO wrote:
On May 31, 10:35*pm, jms wrote: What precisely do you think the point is of starting a thread called
"The pleasures of illegal cycling" ?

It is a reference to a class of cycles which are stupidly strictly not
legal. As you don't have one, you needn't worry about it. Some things
that are of no relevance to you will not be very meaningful - accept
it. Or take the time to find out more and enjoy the best kind of
cycling.
PhilO

Interesting: which class is that? Also interesting that Chapman is so
sanctimonious about others breaking the law, yet he still breaks the
law himself when he decides that the law is "stupid". Yet again, he
is shown to be a hypocrite of the worst kind.