View Single Post
  #15  
Old May 9th 18, 08:36 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Thoughtful non-cyclist of the day

On 09/05/18 01:56, JNugent wrote:
On 08/05/2018 19:21, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/05/18 14:54, JNugent wrote:
On 08/05/2018 08:35, TMS320 wrote:
On 07/05/18 15:56, JNugent wrote:
On 07/05/2018 08:55, TMS320 wrote:
On 06/05/18 23:12, TMS320 wrote:
On 05/05/18 14:40, JNugent wrote:

[1] People crossing across a properly laid-out footway crossing
between a driveway and the carriageway have the priority,
whether they're on a bike, in a car, etc.

[2] Quote the statute. If you are able to then it is a bad law.

You are active because have replied to another thread since my
request. Nothing to support your idea?

What are you talking about?

It's very simple. You make a statement, such as in [1], and as
common practice, someone asks you [2] to substantiate it.

For your information, a person riding a bike along the pavement
(there are plenty of shared paths), often has to give way at a
driveway (just like pedestrians), not because of an obligation, but
because a driver has a complete disregard for the safety of others.

Who asked for what, and when, and what is the paragraph beginning
"You are active" about?


The what and when are clear enough. I asked you to justify your
statement at the top on 06/05/18 23:12. You answered another thread at
07/05/18 00:43. Hence you had been active (on this group) before I
asked you again in the morning. One has to assume that you don't know
what you are talking about.


I certainly don't know what *you* are talking about - which obviously
makes two of us.


I do happen to know.

Are you under the impression that I am obliged to do as you say?


You are not obliged to but it depends on whether you want to be taken
seriously.
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home