On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 8:37:33 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:23:45 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait.
So explain why you don't trim posts?
If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women?
And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy?
O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women.
-- Jay Beattie.
Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. But nevertheless it is a human life that you are willing to terminate at the request of someone else while imprisoning a murderer for doing the same thing.
So, in any case of pregnancy, the woman must carry the child to term? I just want to be clear on the rules of the Caliphate.
-- Jay Beattie.