On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:02:35 -0800, "Gwood" wrote:

..While I oppose Mikey at almost all times, this is one where I have to agree.
..So it's (1) private land, (2) there is a trail closure and then clearly
..states (3) NO trespassing, riding it just ****es people off and creates bad
..feelings against the MTB community.
..
..Congrats and hope it was a great ride - maybe it's the last for folks on
..that trail.

I doubt it. NOT ONE other mountain biker said anything against it. But you can't
be blamed, right? You did your part, right? Now you have a clean conscience,
right?????

.. - it says in no uncertain terms that the land on both sides of the road
..for the "next 4
..miles" is private property and there is NO TRESPASSING ALLOWED, it even
..makes mention of security cameras. This sign is in addition to the "closed"
..signs that were posted in Mid November marking the normal Victor Closure.
..

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande