On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:22:43 -0700, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
"A Comparative Study of Impacts to Mountain Bike Trails in Five
Common Ecological Regions of the Southwestern U.S." (White et al 2006)

1. Are the authors mountain bikers? They seem to be promoting mountain
biking -- trying to make it seem environmentally acceptable.

As usual, if it doesn't agree
with you, it's not true.

I didn't say that; YOU did.

What
is your point?

BTW -- you can't reference a
non-published paper (such as
all of yours) as
'discrediting' something if
it's not peer-reviewed.

But it HAS been peer-reviewed, many times (of course, in this field, I
have no peers: all other researchers have produced nothing but junk
science.

But
you knew that.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande