On Monday, September 23, 2013 4:20:26 PM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sunday, September 22, 2013 6:39:51 PM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:

On Monday, September 23, 2013 11:42:49 AM UTC+12, Mike Vandeman wrote:



On Sunday, September 22, 2013 11:30:01 AM UTC-7, I love Mike wrote:







Still promoting your laughable research old chum? Hilarious. You have no credentials or qualifications in environmental science. Your views on mountain biking are irrelevant. You are a psychologist not a natural scientist nor do you have the capability to produce any credible science owing to your irrationality and biases.















REAL scientists (unlike you) disagree:















Vandeman, Michael J. ), 1998. Wildlife Need Habitat Off-Limits to Humans! in Personal, Societal, and Ecological Values of Wilderness: Sixth World Wilderness Congress: Proceedings on Research, Management, and Allocation: A. E. Watson, G. H. Aplet, J. C. Hendee, eds. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; also available at http://mjvande.nfshost.com/india3.htm.















Vandeman, Michael J. ), "The Myth of the Sustainable Lifestyle". Presented at the Society for Conservation Biology meeting, University of Hawaii, Hilo, Hawaii, July 30, 2001, http://mjvande.nfshost.com/sustain.htm.















Vandeman, Michael J. ), 2008. The Impacts of Mountain Biking on Amphibians and Reptiles. In Urban Herpetology. J. C. Mitchell, R. E. Jung Brown, and B. Bartholomew, editors. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Conservation 3:155-156; expanded version also available at http://mjvande.nfshost.com/herp.htm.















etc.







I am sorry that's not good enough. Two of those "publications" are conference papers an have not been published. Finally that last one is very old and doesn't contain any meaningful data on impacts. It is an opinion piece is a very obscure publication. If you want to make a difference get an education, do some field work and get it published in a real journal.



You, on the other hand, aren't qualified to judge. EVERY publication is "obscure", to your uneducated mind. Nor are you anywhere to be seen at any of the conferences or publications.

Mikey: I don't turn to those conferences where you are presenting for the simple reason I don't value your opinion. You are not a scientist. You are a psychologist who has had major problems with the law. Perhaps more importantly the real big name journals for conservation are conservation biology, biological conservation and nature. You have no articles or research notes published in any of these publications....