On 05/07/2020 21:24, Mike Collins wrote:
On Sunday, 5 July 2020 19:24:41 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 05/07/2020 18:38, Simon Mason wrote:

On Sunday, July 5, 2020 at 6:30:49 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:

So you agree there is no evidence the pedestrian was the victim. I assume you will be retracting your previous post.

The pedestrian could have been on a mobile (not unusual these days) and blindly walked out into the road in front of the cyclist and knocked him off. Then who is the victim?

Deal with the facts as known.

Not with your imaginary visions.

Exactly.
Now what FACTS to you have to support your claim the pedestrian was the victim?

We start with the scarpering by the guilty cyclist and his not coming
forward when asked to by the police.

Do you say that he failure to identify himself is a mark of innocence?