On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 10:37:37 PM UTC, news18 wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 11:18:10 -0800, sltom992 wrote:


While NASA management have been publishing that absolutely false data
about rising temperatures other departments of NASA and NOAA have been
investigating the Russian science and after three hard years of study
have decided that the Russian paper is correct.

Do you have a reference for that? It will be interesting to see what part
is "correct".

One hardly needs a reference for a statement that globally a cold spell is more likely than a warm one. That much is common core historical and scientific knowledge: warm spells are the exception, cold spells the norm, and longer too. Well, I suppose it is historical knowledge to all except the obsessed global warmies, who should really be collectively treated as a minority religious group, more interested in "proving" their faith than in scientific facts.

Andre Jute
There is more science in Scientology than in Global Warming