On Apr 5, 10:36*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Apr 5, 7:59*am, Shraga wrote:


On Apr 4, 10:50*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:

On Apr 4, 5:13*pm, Bob Berger wrote:
So, Vandeman is guilty of some of the things he’s accused of,

BS. That is only the opinion of the jury, NONE OF WHOM, OF COURSE,
WERE PRESENT WHEN THE INCIDENTS HAPPENED! We know that juries convict
the innocent and free the guilty all the time. Sorry to disappoint
you.

Wow. You don't have a clue how our legal system works do you?

Of course they weren't present, idiot. It was YOUR responsibility to
explain YOUR side of the story to YOUR lawyer, who, in turn, presented
your side to the jury.

The fact that your bigoted, biased drivel didn't play in your favor in
court is YOUR fault, and nobody else's. Quit trying to pawn
responsibility off on someone else, you pathetic child.

You weren't there either, so what you have to say is totally
irelevant, besides being libellous.

Accusing the plaintiff of perjury is also a very serious charge. If
this is true, you have a right to claim for damages from malicious
prosecution. Have you reported this crime (i.e., perjury) to your
local police to begin this process? Have you filed a bar claim against
your lawyer?

If you haven't done this, then YOU are the one making libelous claims
about the plaintiffs.

It's funny how you proudly cite the court's decisions without comment
that favor your innocence, but you dismiss the guilty verdicts and
make excuses about them.

The FACT is that you were found GUILTY, in a court of law, of charges
brought against you. Your claims of so-called "innocence" are more of
your bull****. You are a known liar, and no sane person will take your
word over the court's.