High visibility law yields no improvement in safety
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 3:23:28 AM UTC+1, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 8:27:21 PM UTC-4, Andre Jute wrote:
That leaves another Krygowski nothingburger. Perhaps he thought we'd read his deceptive headline and pass on without checking the article.
I thought perhaps people would read the article and we could have an intelligent
conversation. Jute, I didn't expect you to take part, since you don't qualify.
- Frank Krygowski
Oh, but we are having an intelligent conversation, Franki-boy. Its purpose is to expose your incompetent and deceitful method of conducting your war on facts you don't like.
Here you deceitful headline is again, Franki-boy: "High visibility law yields no improvement in safety". Instead of slinging limp personal insults, why don't you attempt to prove your headline is not deceitful so we can all enjoy a giggle at your floundering in another morass of your own making?
Unsigned out of contempt.
|