On 3 Dec 2006 18:43:35 -0800, "
wrote:
Mike Vandeman wrote:
There are several things wrong with Tom Stienstra's approach:
Here's the reference to the original article, entitled Gridlock in Wild
Areas. The article
suggests ways to mitigate user conflicts in recreation areas.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...sn=001&sc=1000
Yeah, by taking trails away from the majority, and giving them over to
exclusive use by a minority: mountain bikers. There is no user
conflict. the conflict is merely over the presence of BIKES, which are
not users.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande