"S Curtiss" wrote in message
...


True to form. You split the context in a meeger attempt at changing
direction. You are pathetic in the extreme in your manner of discussion
and your lack of honesty in the recognition of real information.
How about recognizing the complete context for a change? How about
exhibiting some integrity of the title (PhD) you constantly flaunt? How
about actually recognizing the complete pool of scientific evidence rather
than pulling only the pieces you like?

"You also ignore in your judgements against cycling and other recreation,
that it is the urban expansion that reduces and fragments these areas of
habitat onto an ever decreasing footprint causing surviving wildlife to be
more sensitive to human presence."

When you acknowledge it is the urban growth that is reducing numbers,
rather than the mere presence of a person (bike or no bike), you will have
taken a big leap of integrity and honesty. Until then, you have no
platform on which to present your "opinions".

Even today, the AP issued a story on the loss of species and global
warming featuring comments by University of Texas biologist Camille
Parmesan. Nothing indicates the existence or use of mountain bikes is
exacting changes of climate.
Perhaps you should have stayed focused on the old mission stated in your
sig (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road
construction.) Maybe then you could have saved some lives.



He's not interested in a constructive result, he's a troll
and he's playing you for a reaction like a kid poking a bug.
He doesn't give a crap for the environment or wildlife or he would direct
his
considerable efforts in a direction where they might actually accomplish
something.
Instead he gets his jollys from annoying and namecalling.
If you visit the groups he crossposts to that are concerned with the
environment
you will find that his posts are completely ignored.

As you've already seen a reasoned response, logical, annotated, factual is a
waste of time.
He's like a child making prank calls when Mommy and Daddy aren't home.
He's only interested in getting a response so he can start calling names.
His PhD is in a field wholly unrelated to nature, biology and environment.
His job is in a cubicle for a telecommunications company.
He's an impotent nobody crying out for attention and he gets it only here.



He loses when his posts get ZERO response and sit alone and ignored between
other threads.
That's the only way to defeat a troll. Like Tinkerbelle, when no one
believes in him anymore
he will wither and die.

If you must repond to him, please delete his stupid diatribe. It's criminal
to consider
how many servers are necessary for Google to preserve his nonsense because
people
duplicate his entire post to respond.