"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 09:57:01 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

On 25/08/2013 08:00, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 24/08/2013 18:31, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:59:25 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

On 24/08/2013 15:12, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:53:20 +0100, Mrcheerful
wrote:

http://www.thisiss****horpe.co.uk/Pe...#axzz2ctH0GWYv



My thoughts are with the deceased dog's family and friends, and
sibling Toffee.


I hope the owners claim compo off the cyclist.

Did they get the cyclist's name and address?

They probably got a load of abuse and a smack in the mouth, they're in
their 70s after all.

Just think how much better it would be if the bike had a registration
plate, etc, etc, etc. (yawn) lol

now you get the idea, likely that a registered cyclist would also have
insurance to pay for the dog's funeral expenses etc. a registered
cyclist would have ridden with more care in the first place so the crash
might not have taken place at all. win-win all round

Do you have any evidence to suggest that the cyclist had no insurance?

Why, do you have some evidence that he did?