View Single Post
  #6  
Old May 23rd 08, 07:19 AM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.soc,alt.mountain-bike
Edward Dolan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,212
Default Is ARBR dead?


"JimmyMac" wrote in message
...
On May 22, 2:34 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:

[...]
Ed, I am loath to advise you that ARBR has indeed died. In fact, it
died
sometime ago when Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, killed it with
his
odious posts and interferences. He was aided and abetted by Jim
McNamara,


Abetted??? Well you can't have it both ways so make up you feeble
mind why don't you? In th past you wrote ... "Jim is an expert in
dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of
experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only
Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal
vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup."


Ed Dolan subscribes to the fanciful notion that a falsehood is every
bit as good as the truth as long as someone is stupid enough to
believe him. Ed Dolan hopes that in repeating a lie long enough, that
perhaps someone will eventually begin to believe him.


All anyone has to do to see who is lying is to go to the Google Archives
for
ARBR from a couple of years ago and see who was saying what to whom and
how
it was being said


I can only presume that you were so bold because you are confident
that no one aould ever follow your advice or I would have cautioned to
to tread softly. Just where do you suppose the quotes ... "Jim is an
expert in dealing with criminal vandal trolls as he has had a world of
experience with a particular one who went by the name of Ed Gin. Only
Jim McNamara, I and a very few others ever stood up to this criminal
vandal troll to defend the ARBR cycling newsgroup." can be found?
Why in the Google Archives for ARBR. That's where and whose words
might they be?


Well, that was then, this is now.

Well there yours and stand in utter contradiction of
you unsubstantiated assertion (read LIE) that I aided and abetted Ed
Gin. You really should make a concerted effort not to say things you
cannot prove and not say things that contradict what you have already
written so as not to undermine your credibility and illustrate what a
fool you are.


I hold you responsible for bringing Ed Gin to this newsgroup (ARBR). You
should have kept your squabbles with him confined to emails. After all, you
knew the kind of criminal he was. Why did you inflict him on the group?

Also in the Goolge Archives for ARBR can be found the
following quote of yours ... "I will stand by every message I have
ever posted to Usenet, bar none. Some of my posts will require some
explanation no doubt, but I can defend and justify everything I have
ever said to anyone." So how do you propose to stand by two
diametrically opposed accounts? Some of your posts require some
explanation for sure, but good luck defending and justifying
incongruous contradiction. The conundrum continues!


You have earned for yourself the reputation of a stalker. This supersedes
whatever qualities you may have had in the past.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota



Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home