Marc wrote:

Roger Merriman wrote:
Marc wrote:

JNugent wrote:
Marc wrote:
Peter Grange wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:52:07 +0100, nully wrote:

Marc wrote:
HarryHill wrote:
big snips
Out of common courtesy the cyclist should have stopped, IMO. Please
don't extend the act of one person to "all cyclists are beyond fault,
right?".
Stopped to be bitten?
Stopped to be attacked by the "aggrieved" owner?

Loose turd dispenser,
Loose turd dispenser is scared but unhurt by cyclist
Loose turd dispenser learns lesson
Turd dispenser's owner doesn't learn lesson and starts a petition to
spend £100,000s rather than her buying a lead

What possible help would it have been for the cyclist to have stopped?
He could have aplogised. It often goes a long way to assuage injury and
hurt.
Does he/she speak doggiewoggie?

dogs are very good at working out our meaning.
Then maybe he/she did apologise , to the dog, and the owner didn't get told?

that doesn't sound like that happened, does it?

it's a shared path, dogs and childern and such. you keep your speed way
down.

roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com