On Monday, October 22, 2018 at 12:38:13 PM UTC-7, Tosspot wrote:
On 10/22/18 11:08 AM, Andre Jute wrote:
What I've been saying since I was a precocious teenager with a column in a national broadsheet is now official:
http://joannenova.com.au/2018/10/fir...boats-on-land/

Fake news.

What I find interesting is that those most loudly pro-AGW are those with the least training. Most of whom have received their entire knowledge on the subject from a single article in Popular Mechanics from an author who is also unqualified.

There is no AGW because CO2 has reached saturation of the available energy in its absorption bands at between 200 and 250 ppm. This is a naturally occurring level so man's addition to the CO2 carries no added absorption.

That CO2 bears no danger to anyone was known and was PUBLISHED by the Department of Commerce's science department which was the forerunner of NOAA around 1905 after Arrhenius published a paper around 1880 suggesting that the reason that the Earth was warmer out of direct sunlight than the Moon was because of the CO2 in the air. Arrhenius never ran any experiments himself but used data on the spectrum of sunlight that was reflected off of the Moon that was published in another paper.

So if you have any credentials then state them and we can discuss the hoax of AGW since I have studied the matter for many years.