View Single Post
  #26  
Old July 30th 17, 12:14 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Sparrows are a protected species

On 29/07/17 16:06, JNugent wrote:
On 29/07/2017 15:33, TMS320 wrote:
On 29/07/17 01:28, JNugent wrote:
On 28/07/2017 20:31, TMS320 wrote:
On 28/07/17 16:37, JNugent wrote:
On 14/07/2017 12:04, Ian Smith wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 13/07/2017 19:33, TMS320 wrote:


That is assuming a camera is fitted - I have seen boxes fitted
with flash but no camera. No harm if the threshold is lowered,
should they do that.


Causing unnecessary anxiety to people obeying the law is acceptable
on your planet, is it?


What possible anxiety would be caused to someone obeying the law?


That's easy to understand if you are in "understand" mode.

It goes like this... you drive along a road at 29 or 30mph.

A Gatso camera flashes the rear of your vehicle even though you are
travelling within the 30mph speed limit.

Even bearing in mind that the photographs are allegedly scrutinised
by a suppposed human before decisions are taken, you don't know
what the local authority staff will try to "prove" with the image,
especially in an area (eg, Brighton) run by half-lunatics
determined to do as much harm to visiting drivers as they can get
away with.

You have moved from getting flashed by a box to being incorrectly
charged. It would be much easier if you moved to understand mode.

Please explain what purpose there can possibly be in the Gatso
flashing a vehicle which is not being driven in excess of the speed
limit (if you can, which you can't).


Nothing was said about the person(s) involved being below the posted
limit.


Er... yes, it was.

It is the central point.

See the bit above where it says: "...you drive along a road at 29 or
30mph. A Gatso camera flashes the rear of your vehicle even though you
are travelling within the 30mph speed limit".


Your words only. After your failed comprehension of anything that went
before.

Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home