On Sep 6, 12:29*am, James wrote:
On Sep 6, 4:54*am, Andre Jute wrote:

On Sep 5, 7:29*pm, Dan O wrote:

On Sep 5, 8:55 am, Frank Krygowski wrote:

snip

*You don't know so much as you think you do.
This is some serious knee-jerk adversarialism you're locked into.
Just because you've stuffed a big bag full of data and polished (and
polished, and polished) a bunch of talking points doesn't make you
right or anyone else wrong.

Anyone with "polished (and polished, and polished) [...] talking
points" is an obsessed apparatchik who *needs* to polish those
received "talking points" because he can't think for himself.

You know, I've heard it said "You can't polish ****." *The Myth
Busters tried, but they weren't very successful.

JS.

I used to work in advertising. Occasionally one would hear somone brag
that he could "sell any old ****". I wouldn't ever hire those because,
besides reasons of professional pride and principle, I thought they
were bull****ters. Nobody can polish ****, as you say. But Krygowski
got away with chanting his idiotic mantras so long that I can't help
wondering how many obsessed wishful thinkers (i.e. really stupid
people) there are in cycling. -- Andre Jute