View Single Post
  #7  
Old September 16th 05, 03:27 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Brutal breach of rider's rights!

Bull****. The riders have agreed to be tested under a set of rules and
procedures that form a written behavioral contract. If Hein violated
the rider confidentiality agreed to in that contract then he's scum.
-------------------------------
You seem to think the cyclists have the power, which
has never been the case, maybe I'm mistaken but I've read cyclists
complain about
their almost complete lack of rights...the 98 tour was a good
example.
I think the average cyclist is concerned with making a living and
getting a multi-year contract...all this stuff about rights is
bull****.
They search their rooms and bags, they draw blood
at 5am, random doping tests, European authorities aren't really big on
american consitutional and civil rights - no other athletes in any
sport allows stuff like that.
The cyclists are just pawns in the game, you might idolize and
worship them, but %99 of them are powerless and dispensible
so just give up all the outrage. if they don't like get treated like
that,
there are many fresh amatuers just waiting to get a contract,
and the stars are just trying to stay low on the doping radar

pro cyclists are junkies, they just want to remain
undetected and make some money, so the governing bodies
pretend they are gonna test and the cyclists pretend they are
clean - it's a game.
all this outrage, why do you think the pros themselves aren't
as outraged as you? because if they spoke up they'd get properly
tested and be out of a job.
you can't be this naive.
How was pantani guiltless? he was the biggest science experiment
in the history of cycling, remember when all of a sudden the little
dwarf could TT at 55KM an hour...yeah he was clean.
Trying to make him a martyr isn't gonna work.

Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home