On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 5:26:40 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 08/11/2019 17:22, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 4:25:03 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 08/11/2019 16:08, Simon Jester wrote:

On Friday, November 8, 2019 at 6:10:21 AM UTC, MrCheerful wrote:

Guess what? He didn't leave his details.

https://www.gazetteherald.co.uk/news...yclist-norton/

Luckily the victim was riding a bicycle rather than driving a car.
Of course had the child run out in front of a car nobody would consider blaming the driver.

QUOTE:
The cyclist did stop at the scene and after remaining for a short time
and passing on his apologies, continued on his journey.
ENDQUOTE

So the cyclist apologised because he'd done nothing wrong and it was all
the victim's fault.

I bet we're all glad that that's sorted out.

I wonder why he didn't leave his name and address so that the child's
parents could forward a cheque for damage to his bike and to compensate
for his hurt feelings / shock?

Hook, line, sinker, rod and copy of Angling Times.

Inculcate competing and balancing blurred nest wanderings, captions
excluded.

See? You aren't the only one who can string together a collection of
random words.

My words may seem random to something from Liverpool but they should make sense to a human with an IQ greater than a cucumber.