On 22-Jul-2005, smacked up and reeling, "psycholist"
blindly formulated
the following incoherence:

How dare you come into this newsgroup and ask a bike-racing-related
question
without already knowing the answer or without having thoroughly exhausted
every internet search engine, searched the Library of Congress

Actually I went to the Library of Congress, but they just called me a
"dumbass"...


Not, the answer to your question is, "all of the above," spiced with a
dose
of extortion.

I read the stuff at his website, and his claim is rather general, i.e. that
a positive result of less than 5% (5% of what I dont know...being a dumbass)
can be the result of "other causes", and that THs result was rumoured (and
why doesnt he know?) to be about 1%.

Imagine if he is innocent..and Ill readily grant him that presumption...what
an injustice that would be on so many levels.

steve
--
"Local firemen improvised."
Benny Hill