"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...

.Dear Mike,
.
.1) Your hypotheses are flawed, your sources are not scientific, your
.conclusions are invalid.
.2) Your alleged PhD is ficticious.
.3) As defined by your standard footer you are wholly ineffective, a
joke
.actually.
.4) The responses you get here is the only recognition you get in your
.life.
.
.Let me guess. Unemployed, living with parents, no adult relationships,
.right hand is your best buddy.

Did you say something?

Unemployed. Living with parents. No relationships.
Specious arguments, specious credentials.
Pathetic. Anonymous Dysfunctional. Alone.
Yeah, I said you are a loser and a liar.


===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Love the last eight years.
If I were a weapons manufacturer I'd want you working for peace.