Thread: URT sucks?
View Single Post
  #23  
Old June 30th 03, 04:41 AM
P e t e F a g e r l i n
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default URT sucks?

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 23:19:10 +0200, "Dave Stocker"
wrote:

|"P e t e F a g e r l i n" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
.. .
|
|
| The Bow Ti is a Sweet Spot bike----------------URT.
|
| It's really not that difficult.
|
| But
| |this is a moot, bucause I already said in my last post that I now agree
|that
| |the Bow Ti is a URT. So what is the problem?
|
| Hmmm...I would ascribe it to some reading comprehension issues on your
| part or an inabilty to understand exactly what "Sweet Spot" means (URT
| with the pivot located in the middle, rather than at the extremes).
|
|
|I started this thread hoping to talk a bit about the physics of these
|things. Oh well, it was not to be...

So you usually start discussion, wherein you want to talk about the
physiscs of bike suspensions, by posting a bunch of stuff that is
inaccurate and based upon supposition?

Interesting.

Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home