On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:49:38 AM UTC+1, sms wrote:
On 12/5/2017 11:58 AM, Tosspot wrote:
On 03/12/17 22:35, Andre Jute wrote:
On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 10:39:17 AM UTC, Tosspot wrote:
On 03/12/17 05:02, Oculus Lights wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 2:34:34 PM UTC-8, James wrote:
https://www.bike24.com/p2144878.html

-- JS

B&M plays the lux only racket.Â* But their lights are poor
lumens/lux ratio.Â* Lux only says the intensity at the brightest
point anywhere in the beam.Â* No mention if this is STVZO or not..
Best guess is that it isn't.

https://www.bumm.de claim it is StVZO compliant.

You guessed wrong, Barry. I would be exceedingly surprised to
discover that any BUMM lamp is not StVZO compliant. That is BUMM's
USP or unique selling point and has always been. It is precisely this
StVZO compliance that makes their lamps inferior to yours in output
and superior to yours in beam shaping.

Who the **** is Barry?

Barry manufactures the Oculus light, a very nice battery powered,
self-contained, 1800 lumen battery powered light, and now there is a
3000 lumen model. Very well designed beam that doesn't suffer from the
limitations of most dynamo lights.

but still is a battery powered light with the drawback of their limited running time which is the main reason for the people using dynamo lights not to chose for that option.

Lou