On 2017-10-19 10:56, wrote:
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 9:46:46 AM UTC-7, Joerg wrote:
On 2017-10-19 08:33, wrote:
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 3:18:00 AM UTC-7, Ned Mantei wrote:
On 19-10-17 01:31, Joerg wrote:
Folks,

There was a story in the Wall Street Journal where a Californian
rider said that people 70 and older are now allowed to use
E-bikes on MTB trails. I could not find anything about it
elsewhere and a LBS owner also couldn't. Does anyone know?

It's not for me, I will stay pedal-only. However, some older
folks around here might be helped by it.

This was the story but it likely can only be read by people with
a Wall Street Journals subscription:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/instead...ike-1507374019




Quote "When teenagers tease Bruce Austin for powering up a mountain
trail on his electric mountain bike, his comeback is: "Didn't you
hear California passed a law that people 70 or older can ride an
e-bike?""



Not relevant to California, but I have been seeing a lot of E-MTBs
here in Switzerland--on one day 5 of 6 other mountain bikes were
E-bikes.

Even though I'm over 70, I would avoid a E-MTB because of the
weight. The motor only helps when you are pedaling, so when lifting
it over a rock, stairway, or fence**, or even just pushing up a
steep trail, you have more weight than I could deal with.

**Lifting over a fence doesn't mean that I'm trespassing. Sometimes
on a mountain road or trail there will be a fence around a pasture,
and a narrow turnstile or V-shaped gate for hikers that isn't wide
enough to let a bike roll through.

The weight problem with a normal full suspension bike is why I
returned to cyclocross bikes. Though the super-light weight and no
suspension has its own set of problems.


It also depends on whether the rider has chronic lower back issues. I
do, so full-suspension is the only option when using gnarlier trails
like the one yesterday. If my road bike frame ever croaks I'd also get a
cyclocross frame but more for being able to use dirt roads with better
peace of mind and better traction than now with those 25mm tires (frame
can't take more width).

You'd have to go used. The latest cyclocross bikes are so far out in left field you'd think they were designed for racers only.

https://www.competitivecyclist.com/r...YXQxMDAxNTg =

http://www.wiggle.com/eddy-merckx-ee...c100 387740us

Though slightly better but carbon:

https://www.cxmagazine.com/review-re...-bike-issue-28


Too expensive and I don't want carbon, ever. It'll be more like a
trekking bike which someone here recommended. Good old steel frame:

https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...?colorCode=tan

I don't like the bar end shifters because they can hurt in a crash but
with brifters the bikes only come in aluminum:

https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/b...?colorCode=tan

BikesDirect has some with Ti-frames, though no sturdy rack mounts:

http://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...ti-viii-21.jpg

Upping 160mm to 8-inch rotors should make mechanical disc brakes
palatable but I believe the one above has hydraulics.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/