Police to investigate driver overtaking cyclist on double lines
On 23/06/2020 16:57, JNugent wrote:
On 20/06/2020 15:49, TMS320 wrote:
On 20/06/2020 00:52, JNugent wrote:
On 19/06/2020 17:16, TMS320 wrote:
On 19/06/2020 14:51, JNugent wrote:
On 19/06/2020 13:22, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
You insist on refusing to see that *safety* is of paramount
concern;
That is a blatant lie.
True. You're quite happy to put others in danger when you use
the convenience of your car
Grow up.
Face the facts.
...that you aren't going to grow up?
....that you regret saying that "other peoples' safety is MUCH more
important than your convenience or your ego."
the reason we have laws (apart from tax-gathering) is to
regulate safety.
Quite so. And no-one is safe unless the law is complied
with.
Nonsense.
....
Obeying the rules is never a guarantee of safety. Breaking the
rules is not necessarily unsafe.
See what I mean?
Yes, it shows you live in some sort of Never Never land.
It shows - were it necessary - that you don't care about rules meant
to protect others. The only rules for which you ever show support are
those you "think" protect you.
It shows you are wrong. I want people to use the roads safely.
Your idealism that the rules define a safe/unsafe threshold is touching
but totally unrealistic.
|