#151
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
Am 13.08.2019 um 00:10 schrieb Tom Kunich:
But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? I have made that decision as well, and I would have supported the would-be mother to make her own decision when the contraceptive had failed a few weeks into our relationship. Her decision (and mine) was to let nature have its course, and nature decided it was not the right time, so she had to have exactly the same procedure done at the hospital to remove the dead fetus as she would have in case of a different decision. 5 Years later, her third pregnancy was the first successful one. |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait. So explain why you don't trim posts? If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women? And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women. -- Jay Beattie. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:23:45 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait. So explain why you don't trim posts? If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women? And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women. -- Jay Beattie. Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. But nevertheless it is a human life that you are willing to terminate at the request of someone else while imprisoning a murderer for doing the same thing. |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 8:37:33 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:23:45 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait. So explain why you don't trim posts? If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women? And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women. -- Jay Beattie. Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. But nevertheless it is a human life that you are willing to terminate at the request of someone else while imprisoning a murderer for doing the same thing. So, in any case of pregnancy, the woman must carry the child to term? I just want to be clear on the rules of the Caliphate. -- Jay Beattie. |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 9:21:22 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 8:37:33 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:23:45 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait. So explain why you don't trim posts? If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women? And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women. -- Jay Beattie. Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. But nevertheless it is a human life that you are willing to terminate at the request of someone else while imprisoning a murderer for doing the same thing. So, in any case of pregnancy, the woman must carry the child to term? I just want to be clear on the rules of the Caliphate. -- Jay Beattie. So cold blooded murder is perfectly acceptable in your book. Just want to make sure that an officer of the law thinks the laws are a nuisance. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 3:50:42 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 9:21:22 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 8:37:33 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:23:45 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait. So explain why you don't trim posts? If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women? And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women. -- Jay Beattie. Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. But nevertheless it is a human life that you are willing to terminate at the request of someone else while imprisoning a murderer for doing the same thing.. So, in any case of pregnancy, the woman must carry the child to term? I just want to be clear on the rules of the Caliphate. -- Jay Beattie. So cold blooded murder is perfectly acceptable in your book. Just want to make sure that an officer of the law thinks the laws are a nuisance. You mean the laws guaranteeing the right to an abortion throughout the first trimester? Those laws? Hey, even sharia law allows abortion in the case of incest and rape. https://qz.com/1628427/saudi-arabias...than-alabamas/ Wouldn't you Ayatollah Tom? -- Jay Beattie. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:03:06 -0700 (PDT), jbeattie
wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 3:50:42 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 9:21:22 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 8:37:33 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:23:45 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait. So explain why you don't trim posts? If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women? And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women. -- Jay Beattie. Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. But nevertheless it is a human life that you are willing to terminate at the request of someone else while imprisoning a murderer for doing the same thing. So, in any case of pregnancy, the woman must carry the child to term? I just want to be clear on the rules of the Caliphate. -- Jay Beattie. So cold blooded murder is perfectly acceptable in your book. Just want to make sure that an officer of the law thinks the laws are a nuisance. You mean the laws guaranteeing the right to an abortion throughout the first trimester? Those laws? Hey, even sharia law allows abortion in the case of incest and rape. https://qz.com/1628427/saudi-arabias...than-alabamas/ Wouldn't you Ayatollah Tom? -- Jay Beattie. "sharia" law (depending on the sect) allows abortion through, usually, the first 120 days, and always in the event of danger to the mother. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_abortion -- cheers, John B. |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:37:31 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:
Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. Gee, in my little back water, I've heard of about one per decade if notg more. Doig the maths, there must be close to a million pa. globally. But nevertheless it is a human life Nope. |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 4:03:08 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote:
On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 3:50:42 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 9:21:22 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 8:37:33 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 7:23:45 AM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 3:10:44 PM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 12:46:39 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 11:48:22 AM UTC-7, Tom Kunich wrote: So explain the difference between murdering that baby and a toddler since it cannot survive on its own either? You seem rather ready to murder things and it is becoming clear that is a liberal trait. So explain why you don't trim posts? If "liberal" means libertarian, yes, I believe the rights of the mother outweigh the interest of the state and/or a pea-sized embryo. With all your tin-foil hat, drain-the-swamp, evil government conspiracies, I would think you would be first in line to support the right of a woman to make her own choice, free from evil government oppression. Do you hate women? And the time to make THAT decision is before a pregnancy and not when the taking of a human life is the alternative. But you've already made that decision haven't you? You say you have a son. What would you think if he was aborted because you gave the mother the idea that you weren't trustworthy? O.K., what if the woman or girl was not pregnant by "choice" -- rape, incest, incapacity? What about failed birth control? What then? Compelled pregnancy and an unwanted child? You do hate women. -- Jay Beattie. Firstly, pregnancies from those sources are almost non-existent. But nevertheless it is a human life that you are willing to terminate at the request of someone else while imprisoning a murderer for doing the same thing. So, in any case of pregnancy, the woman must carry the child to term? I just want to be clear on the rules of the Caliphate. -- Jay Beattie. So cold blooded murder is perfectly acceptable in your book. Just want to make sure that an officer of the law thinks the laws are a nuisance. You mean the laws guaranteeing the right to an abortion throughout the first trimester? Those laws? Hey, even sharia law allows abortion in the case of incest and rape. https://qz.com/1628427/saudi-arabias...than-alabamas/ Wouldn't you Ayatollah Tom? -- Jay Beattie. Jay, all you are doing is claiming that you maintain your morals and ethics simply by redefining when life starts. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Off Topic
Tom Kunich wrote:
Jay, all you are doing is claiming that you maintain your morals and ethics simply by redefining when life starts. You presume to define when human life starts in a different way (a way that makes no sense). I mean, zygotes are alive, but they're not people. Any idiot knows that. The discoloration in your toilet is alive, too, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't scrub it and flush it. I say until you can demonstrate that you're smarter than an animal, you're an animal. Until you can live independently of someone else's human body, you're not even an animal yet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off topic for UK, on topic for another good laugh at cyclists | Mr Pounder Esquire | UK | 1 | May 22nd 16 09:25 PM |
Three Greatest Inventions (2/3 On Topic, 1/3 Off Topic) | Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman | General | 21 | December 19th 06 05:40 AM |
Frank exchange of words with black cabbie New Topic Reply to Topic | spindrift | UK | 50 | August 7th 06 06:25 AM |
Sort of on topic/off topic: Rising toll of kids hurt on roads | wafflycat | UK | 4 | March 24th 06 06:28 PM |
This is off topic some ... but on topic also... make up your mind | Thomas Wentworth | General | 7 | November 8th 05 10:46 PM |