Helmets Work!

On 8/17/2013 4:02 AM, T0m $herman wrote:
On 8/15/2013 12:57 AM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:39:42 AM UTC-4, T0m
$herman wrote:
On 8/14/2013 8:40 PM, Phil W Lee wrote:

"T0m $herman"
considered Wed, 14

Aug 2013 19:29:00 -0500 the perfect time to write:



On 8/14/2013 7:41 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"John B." wrote in message

news
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:51:57 +0100, "Ian Field"

wrote:







"T0m $herman"
wrote in message

...

On 8/12/2013 9:55 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"T0m $herman"
wrote in
message

...

On 8/11/2013 7:47 PM, John B. wrote:

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:03:37 -0400, "Gus"


wrote:



"John B." wrote in message

...

On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:27:29 -0500, AMuzi


wrote:



On 8/10/2013 11:28 AM, T0m $herman wrote:

On 8/10/2013 11:24 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Everyone hates some ethnic group by
default. There are

very few

cultures on the planet that didn't have a
traditional

enemy, usually

the neighboring tribes.



And some hate *all* other groups, and
consider them less

than human.





Because, per George Wigg, "The wogs begin at
Calais".



Actually he was asserting that Winston
Churchill believed that

"Wogs

begin at Calais" :-)



--

Cheers,



John B.





Is it true Churchill was blitzed most the time,
even when German

planes

were not flying over Britain?



Who cares, Churchill was likely the best Prime
Minister that Britain

ever had. If he could do that well hammered
think how he would have

done if he'd been a tea-totaler.



Starting the ruinous WW2 for no good reason



Apparently we had a protection pact with Poland,
so once Hitler

invaded

them we were in there.



Would that have happened if a bloody great part of
Germany had not been

whacked off at the Treaty of Versailles and given
to Poland, and

then the

ethnic Germans persecuted by the Poles? No.



Furthermore, the Soviet Union invaded the part of
Poland Germany did

not.

Why was GB at war with Germany and not the Soviet
Union over this?



As the Nazis spread out across Europe there was
the growing suspicion

that Britain was somewhere down the list!



Hitler was looking to make a peace treaty with
Britain, which is

part of

the reason he did not mop up at Dunkirk.



As the allies overrun the occupied territories,
documents and war

meterials were uncovered that proved that America
was also on Hitler's

list.



How about Germany being on Stalin's list?
Barbarossa was a pre-emptive

strike on the Soviet forces that were massing for
an invasion of

Europe.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwa...sraum_01.shtml




According to most military historians the Germans had
a numerical

superiority on the Eastern Front when they attacked
on 22 June. In

addition the Germans were vastly superior in both
experienced leaders



Stalin bumped off all his best generals, finding the
mass burial sites

was even a propaganda coup for Hitlers mob



Well, some mass killings such as the Katyn Forest were
wrongly blamed on

Germany instead of the Soviet Union for decades after
the war. How many

more crimes were actually done or invented by the
Bolsheviks?



- shortly before they industrialised killing the Jews.



Proof? Oh never mind, you are in a country that could
you send you to,

prison for writing something that does not conform to
the Politically

Correctâ„¢ version. http://vimeo.com/24350691



You want proof?

You can still see the factories on Google Earth.



Factories do not equal industrialized murder.



Thousands of eye-witness accounts, films and
photographs, and detailed

records made by the criminals to keep account of their
"progress"

towards extermination of the entire Jewish and Romany
races (and other

victimised minorities), leave no doubt whatsoever of the
purpose of

those death factories.



What records? There are no records by the Germans of any
mass killings.

And as for eyewitnesses, do you want people such as
Elie Wiesel who

first claimed that the mass killings were by pushing
people into

trenches filled with burning oil, and only changed his
story to poison

gas after that became the accepted version? And why does
the

International Committee of the Red Cross claim less than
300 thousand

deaths in the Third Reich concentration camps - is the
ICRC a white

supremacist organization?



As for the gas chambers, they would not work as claimed,
and those that

exist are post WW2 "reconstructions" by the dear Soviets.



Are you really a believer in the truth and goodness of
Stalin, Beria,

Kaganovich and the other Soviet mass murderers? Why do
you support the

opinions of the proven worst criminals in history?



It is good you write this, because you could be sent to
prison

otherwise. Fortunately for Prof. Fetzer (until recently
a Holocaust

Believerâ„¢), lip service is still paid to the 1st
Amendment:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/04/anti-anti-semitism-and-the-search-for-historical-truth/.


But of course that brings up the question, why does
supposed

inarguable history need the protection of law?



You may be on the right side of currently popular
opinion, but you are

on the wrong side of history, and a de-facto protector of
current

criminals (ask the residents of Occupied Palestine,
Lebanon, Syria,

Libya, Iraq...).



--

T0m $herm@n

General Eisenhower who immediately ordered all his Media
Personnel, army reporters and film makers, to document and
film everything extensively. He actually said, "Make a
clear record of all this, because, sure as little apples,
sometime down the pike, some S.O.B is gonna come along and
deny that this ever happened..!"

Cheers

The same General Eisenhower who murdered German POW in
allied camps after the war, and said nothing about US POW
being taken straight from German camps to the Soviet Gulag?
The same General Eisenhower who was a mediocre mid-ranked
officer (per General MacArthur) who suddenly rocketed
through the ranks to become Supreme Allied Commander in
Europe. The same General Eisenhower who later as President
Eisenhower oversaw the removal of democratic governments in
Guatemala and Iran due to corporate interests, and replaced
by murdering tyrants?

Eisenhower's media personnel, reporters, and film makers
were the very same people who had been producing false
propaganda the whole war.

General Patton knew the truth, and died is a very fishy car
accident soon after the war.

But hey, many people still believe that Saddam Hussein
ordered September 11, 2001 and had weapons of mass
destruction, despite those claims being utter male bovine
excrement.

I expect an apology when the whole facade collapses.


Eisenhower got the job because Patton would have strangled
Montgomery with his bare hands (with impunity as justifiable).

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

On 8/17/2013 9:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 8/17/2013 4:02 AM, T0m $herman wrote:
On 8/15/2013 12:57 AM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:39:42 AM UTC-4, T0m
$herman wrote:
On 8/14/2013 8:40 PM, Phil W Lee wrote:

"T0m $herman"
considered Wed, 14

Aug 2013 19:29:00 -0500 the perfect time to write:



On 8/14/2013 7:41 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"John B." wrote in message

news
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:51:57 +0100, "Ian Field"

wrote:







"T0m $herman"
wrote in message

...

On 8/12/2013 9:55 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"T0m $herman"
wrote in
message

...

On 8/11/2013 7:47 PM, John B. wrote:

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:03:37 -0400, "Gus"


wrote:



"John B." wrote in message

...

On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:27:29 -0500, AMuzi


wrote:



On 8/10/2013 11:28 AM, T0m $herman wrote:

On 8/10/2013 11:24 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Everyone hates some ethnic group by
default. There are

very few

cultures on the planet that didn't have a
traditional

enemy, usually

the neighboring tribes.



And some hate *all* other groups, and
consider them less

than human.





Because, per George Wigg, "The wogs begin at
Calais".



Actually he was asserting that Winston
Churchill believed that

"Wogs

begin at Calais" :-)



--

Cheers,



John B.





Is it true Churchill was blitzed most the time,
even when German

planes

were not flying over Britain?



Who cares, Churchill was likely the best Prime
Minister that Britain

ever had. If he could do that well hammered
think how he would have

done if he'd been a tea-totaler.



Starting the ruinous WW2 for no good reason



Apparently we had a protection pact with Poland,
so once Hitler

invaded

them we were in there.



Would that have happened if a bloody great part of
Germany had not been

whacked off at the Treaty of Versailles and given
to Poland, and

then the

ethnic Germans persecuted by the Poles? No.



Furthermore, the Soviet Union invaded the part of
Poland Germany did

not.

Why was GB at war with Germany and not the Soviet
Union over this?



As the Nazis spread out across Europe there was
the growing suspicion

that Britain was somewhere down the list!



Hitler was looking to make a peace treaty with
Britain, which is

part of

the reason he did not mop up at Dunkirk.



As the allies overrun the occupied territories,
documents and war

meterials were uncovered that proved that America
was also on Hitler's

list.



How about Germany being on Stalin's list?
Barbarossa was a pre-emptive

strike on the Soviet forces that were massing for
an invasion of

Europe.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwa...sraum_01.shtml





According to most military historians the Germans had
a numerical

superiority on the Eastern Front when they attacked
on 22 June. In

addition the Germans were vastly superior in both
experienced leaders



Stalin bumped off all his best generals, finding the
mass burial sites

was even a propaganda coup for Hitlers mob



Well, some mass killings such as the Katyn Forest were
wrongly blamed on

Germany instead of the Soviet Union for decades after
the war. How many

more crimes were actually done or invented by the
Bolsheviks?



- shortly before they industrialised killing the Jews.



Proof? Oh never mind, you are in a country that could
you send you to,

prison for writing something that does not conform to
the Politically

Correctâ„¢ version. http://vimeo.com/24350691



You want proof?

You can still see the factories on Google Earth.



Factories do not equal industrialized murder.



Thousands of eye-witness accounts, films and
photographs, and detailed

records made by the criminals to keep account of their
"progress"

towards extermination of the entire Jewish and Romany
races (and other

victimised minorities), leave no doubt whatsoever of the
purpose of

those death factories.



What records? There are no records by the Germans of any
mass killings.

And as for eyewitnesses, do you want people such as
Elie Wiesel who

first claimed that the mass killings were by pushing
people into

trenches filled with burning oil, and only changed his
story to poison

gas after that became the accepted version? And why does
the

International Committee of the Red Cross claim less than
300 thousand

deaths in the Third Reich concentration camps - is the
ICRC a white

supremacist organization?



As for the gas chambers, they would not work as claimed,
and those that

exist are post WW2 "reconstructions" by the dear Soviets.



Are you really a believer in the truth and goodness of
Stalin, Beria,

Kaganovich and the other Soviet mass murderers? Why do
you support the

opinions of the proven worst criminals in history?



It is good you write this, because you could be sent to
prison

otherwise. Fortunately for Prof. Fetzer (until recently
a Holocaust

Believerâ„¢), lip service is still paid to the 1st
Amendment:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/04/anti-anti-semitism-and-the-search-for-historical-truth/.



But of course that brings up the question, why does
supposed

inarguable history need the protection of law?



You may be on the right side of currently popular
opinion, but you are

on the wrong side of history, and a de-facto protector of
current

criminals (ask the residents of Occupied Palestine,
Lebanon, Syria,

Libya, Iraq...).



--

T0m $herm@n

General Eisenhower who immediately ordered all his Media
Personnel, army reporters and film makers, to document and
film everything extensively. He actually said, "Make a
clear record of all this, because, sure as little apples,
sometime down the pike, some S.O.B is gonna come along and
deny that this ever happened..!"

Cheers

The same General Eisenhower who murdered German POW in
allied camps after the war, and said nothing about US POW
being taken straight from German camps to the Soviet Gulag?
The same General Eisenhower who was a mediocre mid-ranked
officer (per General MacArthur) who suddenly rocketed
through the ranks to become Supreme Allied Commander in
Europe. The same General Eisenhower who later as President
Eisenhower oversaw the removal of democratic governments in
Guatemala and Iran due to corporate interests, and replaced
by murdering tyrants?

Eisenhower's media personnel, reporters, and film makers
were the very same people who had been producing false
propaganda the whole war.

General Patton knew the truth, and died is a very fishy car
accident soon after the war.

But hey, many people still believe that Saddam Hussein
ordered September 11, 2001 and had weapons of mass
destruction, despite those claims being utter male bovine
excrement.

I expect an apology when the whole facade collapses.


Eisenhower got the job because Patton would have strangled Montgomery
with his bare hands (with impunity as justifiable).

Montgomery was at best incompetent, and at worst a traitor.

--
T0m $herm@n

On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 09:59:31 -0500, AMuzi wrote:

On 8/17/2013 4:02 AM, T0m $herman wrote:
On 8/15/2013 12:57 AM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:39:42 AM UTC-4, T0m
$herman wrote:
On 8/14/2013 8:40 PM, Phil W Lee wrote:

"T0m $herman"
considered Wed, 14

Aug 2013 19:29:00 -0500 the perfect time to write:



On 8/14/2013 7:41 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"John B." wrote in message

news
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:51:57 +0100, "Ian Field"

wrote:







"T0m $herman"
wrote in message

...

On 8/12/2013 9:55 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"T0m $herman"
wrote in
message

...

On 8/11/2013 7:47 PM, John B. wrote:

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:03:37 -0400, "Gus"


wrote:



"John B." wrote in message

...

On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:27:29 -0500, AMuzi


wrote:



On 8/10/2013 11:28 AM, T0m $herman wrote:

On 8/10/2013 11:24 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Everyone hates some ethnic group by
default. There are

very few

cultures on the planet that didn't have a
traditional

enemy, usually

the neighboring tribes.



And some hate *all* other groups, and
consider them less

than human.





Because, per George Wigg, "The wogs begin at
Calais".



Actually he was asserting that Winston
Churchill believed that

"Wogs

begin at Calais" :-)



--

Cheers,



John B.





Is it true Churchill was blitzed most the time,
even when German

planes

were not flying over Britain?



Who cares, Churchill was likely the best Prime
Minister that Britain

ever had. If he could do that well hammered
think how he would have

done if he'd been a tea-totaler.



Starting the ruinous WW2 for no good reason



Apparently we had a protection pact with Poland,
so once Hitler

invaded

them we were in there.



Would that have happened if a bloody great part of
Germany had not been

whacked off at the Treaty of Versailles and given
to Poland, and

then the

ethnic Germans persecuted by the Poles? No.



Furthermore, the Soviet Union invaded the part of
Poland Germany did

not.

Why was GB at war with Germany and not the Soviet
Union over this?



As the Nazis spread out across Europe there was
the growing suspicion

that Britain was somewhere down the list!



Hitler was looking to make a peace treaty with
Britain, which is

part of

the reason he did not mop up at Dunkirk.



As the allies overrun the occupied territories,
documents and war

meterials were uncovered that proved that America
was also on Hitler's

list.



How about Germany being on Stalin's list?
Barbarossa was a pre-emptive

strike on the Soviet forces that were massing for
an invasion of

Europe.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwa...sraum_01.shtml




According to most military historians the Germans had
a numerical

superiority on the Eastern Front when they attacked
on 22 June. In

addition the Germans were vastly superior in both
experienced leaders



Stalin bumped off all his best generals, finding the
mass burial sites

was even a propaganda coup for Hitlers mob



Well, some mass killings such as the Katyn Forest were
wrongly blamed on

Germany instead of the Soviet Union for decades after
the war. How many

more crimes were actually done or invented by the
Bolsheviks?



- shortly before they industrialised killing the Jews.



Proof? Oh never mind, you are in a country that could
you send you to,

prison for writing something that does not conform to
the Politically

Correctâ„¢ version. http://vimeo.com/24350691



You want proof?

You can still see the factories on Google Earth.



Factories do not equal industrialized murder.



Thousands of eye-witness accounts, films and
photographs, and detailed

records made by the criminals to keep account of their
"progress"

towards extermination of the entire Jewish and Romany
races (and other

victimised minorities), leave no doubt whatsoever of the
purpose of

those death factories.



What records? There are no records by the Germans of any
mass killings.

And as for eyewitnesses, do you want people such as
Elie Wiesel who

first claimed that the mass killings were by pushing
people into

trenches filled with burning oil, and only changed his
story to poison

gas after that became the accepted version? And why does
the

International Committee of the Red Cross claim less than
300 thousand

deaths in the Third Reich concentration camps - is the
ICRC a white

supremacist organization?



As for the gas chambers, they would not work as claimed,
and those that

exist are post WW2 "reconstructions" by the dear Soviets.



Are you really a believer in the truth and goodness of
Stalin, Beria,

Kaganovich and the other Soviet mass murderers? Why do
you support the

opinions of the proven worst criminals in history?



It is good you write this, because you could be sent to
prison

otherwise. Fortunately for Prof. Fetzer (until recently
a Holocaust

Believerâ„¢), lip service is still paid to the 1st
Amendment:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/04/anti-anti-semitism-and-the-search-for-historical-truth/.


But of course that brings up the question, why does
supposed

inarguable history need the protection of law?



You may be on the right side of currently popular
opinion, but you are

on the wrong side of history, and a de-facto protector of
current

criminals (ask the residents of Occupied Palestine,
Lebanon, Syria,

Libya, Iraq...).



--

T0m $herm@n

General Eisenhower who immediately ordered all his Media
Personnel, army reporters and film makers, to document and
film everything extensively. He actually said, "Make a
clear record of all this, because, sure as little apples,
sometime down the pike, some S.O.B is gonna come along and
deny that this ever happened..!"

Cheers

The same General Eisenhower who murdered German POW in
allied camps after the war, and said nothing about US POW
being taken straight from German camps to the Soviet Gulag?
The same General Eisenhower who was a mediocre mid-ranked
officer (per General MacArthur) who suddenly rocketed
through the ranks to become Supreme Allied Commander in
Europe. The same General Eisenhower who later as President
Eisenhower oversaw the removal of democratic governments in
Guatemala and Iran due to corporate interests, and replaced
by murdering tyrants?

Eisenhower's media personnel, reporters, and film makers
were the very same people who had been producing false
propaganda the whole war.

General Patton knew the truth, and died is a very fishy car
accident soon after the war.

But hey, many people still believe that Saddam Hussein
ordered September 11, 2001 and had weapons of mass
destruction, despite those claims being utter male bovine
excrement.

I expect an apology when the whole facade collapses.


Eisenhower got the job because Patton would have strangled
Montgomery with his bare hands (with impunity as justifiable).

And Douglas MacArthur got fired :-)

--
Cheers,

John B.

On 8/17/2013 11:53 PM, John B. wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 09:59:31 -0500, AMuzi wrote:

On 8/17/2013 4:02 AM, T0m $herman wrote:
On 8/15/2013 12:57 AM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:39:42 AM UTC-4, T0m
$herman wrote:
On 8/14/2013 8:40 PM, Phil W Lee wrote:

"T0m $herman"
considered Wed, 14

Aug 2013 19:29:00 -0500 the perfect time to write:



On 8/14/2013 7:41 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"John B." wrote in message

news
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:51:57 +0100, "Ian Field"

wrote:







"T0m $herman"
wrote in message

...

On 8/12/2013 9:55 AM, Ian Field wrote:





"T0m $herman"
wrote in
message

...

On 8/11/2013 7:47 PM, John B. wrote:

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:03:37 -0400, "Gus"


wrote:



"John B." wrote in message

...

On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:27:29 -0500, AMuzi


wrote:



On 8/10/2013 11:28 AM, T0m $herman wrote:

On 8/10/2013 11:24 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Everyone hates some ethnic group by
default. There are

very few

cultures on the planet that didn't have a
traditional

enemy, usually

the neighboring tribes.



And some hate *all* other groups, and
consider them less

than human.





Because, per George Wigg, "The wogs begin at
Calais".



Actually he was asserting that Winston
Churchill believed that

"Wogs

begin at Calais" :-)



--

Cheers,



John B.





Is it true Churchill was blitzed most the time,
even when German

planes

were not flying over Britain?



Who cares, Churchill was likely the best Prime
Minister that Britain

ever had. If he could do that well hammered
think how he would have

done if he'd been a tea-totaler.



Starting the ruinous WW2 for no good reason



Apparently we had a protection pact with Poland,
so once Hitler

invaded

them we were in there.



Would that have happened if a bloody great part of
Germany had not been

whacked off at the Treaty of Versailles and given
to Poland, and

then the

ethnic Germans persecuted by the Poles? No.



Furthermore, the Soviet Union invaded the part of
Poland Germany did

not.

Why was GB at war with Germany and not the Soviet
Union over this?



As the Nazis spread out across Europe there was
the growing suspicion

that Britain was somewhere down the list!



Hitler was looking to make a peace treaty with
Britain, which is

part of

the reason he did not mop up at Dunkirk.



As the allies overrun the occupied territories,
documents and war

meterials were uncovered that proved that America
was also on Hitler's

list.



How about Germany being on Stalin's list?
Barbarossa was a pre-emptive

strike on the Soviet forces that were massing for
an invasion of

Europe.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwa...sraum_01.shtml




According to most military historians the Germans had
a numerical

superiority on the Eastern Front when they attacked
on 22 June. In

addition the Germans were vastly superior in both
experienced leaders



Stalin bumped off all his best generals, finding the
mass burial sites

was even a propaganda coup for Hitlers mob



Well, some mass killings such as the Katyn Forest were
wrongly blamed on

Germany instead of the Soviet Union for decades after
the war. How many

more crimes were actually done or invented by the
Bolsheviks?



- shortly before they industrialised killing the Jews.



Proof? Oh never mind, you are in a country that could
you send you to,

prison for writing something that does not conform to
the Politically

Correctâ„¢ version. http://vimeo.com/24350691



You want proof?

You can still see the factories on Google Earth.



Factories do not equal industrialized murder.



Thousands of eye-witness accounts, films and
photographs, and detailed

records made by the criminals to keep account of their
"progress"

towards extermination of the entire Jewish and Romany
races (and other

victimised minorities), leave no doubt whatsoever of the
purpose of

those death factories.



What records? There are no records by the Germans of any
mass killings.

And as for eyewitnesses, do you want people such as
Elie Wiesel who

first claimed that the mass killings were by pushing
people into

trenches filled with burning oil, and only changed his
story to poison

gas after that became the accepted version? And why does
the

International Committee of the Red Cross claim less than
300 thousand

deaths in the Third Reich concentration camps - is the
ICRC a white

supremacist organization?



As for the gas chambers, they would not work as claimed,
and those that

exist are post WW2 "reconstructions" by the dear Soviets.



Are you really a believer in the truth and goodness of
Stalin, Beria,

Kaganovich and the other Soviet mass murderers? Why do
you support the

opinions of the proven worst criminals in history?



It is good you write this, because you could be sent to
prison

otherwise. Fortunately for Prof. Fetzer (until recently
a Holocaust

Believerâ„¢), lip service is still paid to the 1st
Amendment:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/04/anti-anti-semitism-and-the-search-for-historical-truth/.


But of course that brings up the question, why does
supposed

inarguable history need the protection of law?



You may be on the right side of currently popular
opinion, but you are

on the wrong side of history, and a de-facto protector of
current

criminals (ask the residents of Occupied Palestine,
Lebanon, Syria,

Libya, Iraq...).



--

T0m $herm@n

General Eisenhower who immediately ordered all his Media
Personnel, army reporters and film makers, to document and
film everything extensively. He actually said, "Make a
clear record of all this, because, sure as little apples,
sometime down the pike, some S.O.B is gonna come along and
deny that this ever happened..!"

Cheers

The same General Eisenhower who murdered German POW in
allied camps after the war, and said nothing about US POW
being taken straight from German camps to the Soviet Gulag?
The same General Eisenhower who was a mediocre mid-ranked
officer (per General MacArthur) who suddenly rocketed
through the ranks to become Supreme Allied Commander in
Europe. The same General Eisenhower who later as President
Eisenhower oversaw the removal of democratic governments in
Guatemala and Iran due to corporate interests, and replaced
by murdering tyrants?

Eisenhower's media personnel, reporters, and film makers
were the very same people who had been producing false
propaganda the whole war.

General Patton knew the truth, and died is a very fishy car
accident soon after the war.

But hey, many people still believe that Saddam Hussein
ordered September 11, 2001 and had weapons of mass
destruction, despite those claims being utter male bovine
excrement.

I expect an apology when the whole facade collapses.


Eisenhower got the job because Patton would have strangled
Montgomery with his bare hands (with impunity as justifiable).

And Douglas MacArthur got fired :-)

By Truman, who took a suitcase full of cash to prop up his faltering
1948 campaign in return for voting for the recognition of the State of
Israel [1] on stolen Palestinian land at the UN.

Funny (but not ha ha funny) is the same people were backing both the
communists in China and the Zionist invaders of Palestine, which is why
both have always been enemies of the US (public pronouncements not
withstanding).

[1] Which to this day has not lived up to the obligation in either that
UN Resolution, or even its own founding charter.
--
T0m $herm@n