|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Recumbents: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull, overpriced
"Still Just Me" wrote in message
... So how come the entire thing is so low that you are stressed out from fear of being splatted not by a bus but by a common low hatchback because the driver didn't see you? Hatchbacks are rather uncommon these days. At least in civilized countries. Ahem. They're still very common in civilised lands - ones with still profitable car makers... ("We'll be the laughing stock of the civilised world - and America" - goon show, probably 1953) (bike content - I won't buy a saloon/sedan because I want to be able to carry bikes in the car) |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Recumbents: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull,overpriced
On May 31, 6:55*pm, Chalo wrote:
Andre Jute wrote: The only technically interesting trikes I could find were the Tripod from The Netherlands (surprise!) and the Tripendo from Germany (surprise! surprise!), both tilting trikes, both technically interesting on several levels, both too low for daily convenience. Tripod: *http://www.tripod-bikes.com/ Tripendo: *http://www.tripendo.com/DEFAULT.htm You might be intrigued by the German Culty trike. *It rides quite high and it tilts. *Unfortunately for most of us, it is "blessed" with rear steering. http://www.culty.de/ Chalo I've tried one of those, and they are, umm, interesting. A fellow here in town uses his for winter commuting, and the first time I tried it about six years ago I could only ride it in a straight line. But since then I've put many kiliometres on my big cargo trike with tilting front end, and somehow the Culty is now easier for me to ride. That said, I'm not buying one anytime soon. Though I still need to find a replacement for my Linear LWB, because when I want to go for a long ride on two wheels (fast or slow) I find bents to be more enjoyable. Mark |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Recumbents: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull,overpriced
Andre Jute wrote:
The point of a recumbent is a comfortable seat and saving your back, right? The point of a recumbent tricycle even more so, hmm? More comfort, less stress, not so? A recumbent trike would be the ideal geribike, one would think. So how come the things are so low you have to contort yourself and then drop 18 inches -- boing, boing -- to fall into the seat with your bum four inches from the road? So how come the entire thing is so low that you are stressed out from fear of being splatted not by a bus but by a common low hatchback because the driver didn't see you? I've been looking into recumbents for a spot of speeding, and in particular into trikes because I already have bikes that can go fast downhill. Whatever else I buy or build must be different in some significant way, not just more of the same. (I have several upright bikes that are pretty near to perfect, for instance my Utopia Kranich lacking only an automatic Rohloff hub gearbox to be a perfect bike.) In the usual curse of bicycling, a bunch of deranged designers took a good idea -- a bike that doesn't kill your back -- to ridiculous lengths, all of course in the name of sport. Ha-ha. Customers are offered virtually nothing but extremes, and at outrageous prices. I looked only at tricycles with two front wheels. The socalled deltas with one front and two rear wheels are inherently unstable, flipovers waiting to happen. After spending an entire night on the net I found: 1. Catbike, a major offender of the splatable lower-is-better paradigm, launching their Villager as a higher-seated, lower-priced bent trike. Thoughtless fitting out, needs the boom replaced even to swap out the useless single chainring for a triple, the old American curse of extra charges for necessary equipment. Cat's idea of a "higher" seat is still too low by a mile for their target market. 2. The *only* trike I found that doesn't suffer this stupid "sporting image" deficit of a too-low seat is the Anthrotech from Germany, intended for touring, commuting, even shopping. (Nobody is surprised by now that the only good bikes I can find are German or Dutch -- sometimes it looks like the last American bike designer to have his brain in gear was Keith Bontrager.) Anthrotech: http://anthrotech.de/index.html 3. The technology is probably mature, and the form of the tadpole recumbent trike has settled into two ali beams at right angles for chassis and front frame, with a swing arm for the rear suspension. A dreadful dullness is creeping over the format, with only esoteric details distinguishing the different brands, and then only to the obsessed. The wheels are universally small and the ride no doubt nasty. 4. The only technically interesting trikes I could find were the Tripod from The Netherlands (surprise!) and the Tripendo from Germany (surprise! surprise!), both tilting trikes, both technically interesting on several levels, both too low for daily convenience. Tripod: http://www.tripod-bikes.com/ Tripendo: http://www.tripendo.com/DEFAULT.htm So much for the trikes market survey. In summary, there appear to be only one genuine all-round multifunction bike by Anthrotech, and two interesting tilting bikes by Tripod and Tripendo. The rest is a heaving mass of undistinguished sameness. Here you go: http://www.tecnoartsurrey.com/sport.html -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
André Jute: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull, overpriced
Andrew Muzi wrote:
Andre Jute wrote: [...] So much for the trikes market survey. In summary, there appear to be only one genuine all-round multifunction bike by Anthrotech, and two interesting tilting bikes by Tripod and Tripendo. The rest is a heaving mass of undistinguished sameness. Here you go: http://www.tecnoartsurrey.com/sport.html How will it do being towed at 100+ kph by a lorry? -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Recumbents: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull,overpriced
On 31 May, 23:41, Andre Jute wrote:
The point of a recumbent is a comfortable seat and saving your back, right? The point of a recumbent tricycle even more so, hmm? More comfort, less stress, not so? A recumbent trike would be the ideal geribike, one would think. So how come the things are so low you have to contort yourself and then drop 18 inches -- boing, boing -- *to fall into the seat with your bum four inches from the road? So how come the entire thing is so low that you are stressed out from fear of being splatted not by a bus but by a common low hatchback because the driver didn't see you? I've been looking into recumbents for a spot of speeding, and in particular into trikes because I already have bikes that can go fast downhill. Whatever else I buy or build must be different in some significant way, not just more of the same. (I have several upright bikes that are pretty near to perfect, for instance my Utopia Kranich lacking only an automatic Rohloff hub gearbox to be a perfect bike.) In the usual curse of bicycling, a bunch of deranged designers took a good idea -- a bike that doesn't kill your back -- to ridiculous lengths, all of course in the name of sport. Ha-ha. Customers are offered virtually nothing but extremes, and at outrageous prices. I looked only at tricycles with two front wheels. The socalled deltas with one front and two rear wheels are inherently unstable, flipovers waiting to happen. After spending an entire night on the net I found: 1. Catbike, a major offender of the splatable lower-is-better paradigm, launching their Villager as a higher-seated, lower-priced bent trike. Thoughtless fitting out, needs the boom replaced even to swap out the useless single chainring for a triple, the old American curse of extra charges for necessary equipment. Cat's idea of a "higher" seat is still too low by a mile for their target market. 2. The *only* trike I found that doesn't suffer this stupid "sporting image" deficit of a too-low seat is the Anthrotech from Germany, intended for touring, commuting, even shopping. (Nobody is surprised by now that the only good bikes I can find are German or Dutch -- sometimes it looks like the last American bike designer to have his brain in gear was Keith Bontrager.) Anthrotech: *http://anthrotech.de/index.html 3. The technology is probably mature, and the form of the tadpole recumbent trike has settled into two ali beams at right angles for chassis and front frame, with a swing arm for the rear suspension. A dreadful dullness is creeping over the format, with only esoteric details distinguishing the different brands, and then only to the obsessed. The wheels are universally small and the ride no doubt nasty. 4. The only technically interesting trikes I could find were the Tripod from The Netherlands (surprise!) and the Tripendo from Germany (surprise! surprise!), both tilting trikes, both technically interesting on several levels, both too low for daily convenience. Tripod: *http://www.tripod-bikes.com/ Tripendo: *http://www.tripendo.com/DEFAULT.htm So much for the trikes market survey. In summary, there appear to be only one genuine all-round multifunction bike by Anthrotech, and two interesting tilting bikes by Tripod and Tripendo. The rest is a heaving mass of undistinguished sameness. Buy a derestricted moped with a freerunning clutch. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Recumbents: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull, overpriced
"Tom Sherman °_°" wrote in message ... Chalo wrote: Clive George wrote: Andre Jute wrote: The wheels are universally small and the ride no doubt nasty. That'll be experience speaking, will it? When you've actually tried the ride on one, come back and tell us. I've ridden 'bent bikes with 20"/27" and 16"/20" wheels. The big one had a long floppy frame and gave a shaky but smooth ride. The small one gave a treacherous and crappy ride that didn't get better despite my days spent trying to make the best of it. There is no stock recumbent suitable for someone Chalo's size. Since Chalo is in the 99.999th percentile in both height and weight, the manufacturers are not missing much of a market. What is Chalo, an 800 lb. gorilla? [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Recumbents: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull,overpriced
On 31 May, 23:49, "Clive George" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message ... So how come the entire thing is so low that you are stressed out from fear of being splatted not by a bus but by a common low hatchback because the driver didn't see you? I believe you're rather more likely to be noticed on a recumbent trike than on a bike - ie your fear is misplaced. 3. The technology is probably mature, and the form of the tadpole recumbent trike has settled into two ali beams at right angles for chassis and front frame, with a swing arm for the rear suspension. A dreadful dullness is creeping over the format, with only esoteric details distinguishing the different brands, and then only to the obsessed. The wheels are universally small and the ride no doubt nasty. That'll be experience speaking, will it? When you've actually tried the ride on one, come back and tell us. The lower you are on the trike, the faster you can go round corners. That's an important feature of a high performance machine. In a head to head race, is a trike faster than a bike on a winding downhill course? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
André Jute: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull, overpriced
Edward Dolan wrote:
"Tom Sherman °_°" wrote in message ... Chalo wrote: Clive George wrote: Andre Jute wrote: The wheels are universally small and the ride no doubt nasty. That'll be experience speaking, will it? When you've actually tried the ride on one, come back and tell us. I've ridden 'bent bikes with 20"/27" and 16"/20" wheels. The big one had a long floppy frame and gave a shaky but smooth ride. The small one gave a treacherous and crappy ride that didn't get better despite my days spent trying to make the best of it. There is no stock recumbent suitable for someone Chalo's size. Since Chalo is in the 99.999th percentile in both height and weight, the manufacturers are not missing much of a market. What is Chalo, an 800 lb. gorilla? [...] Chalo has listed his height at about 6'8" or so, and weight ranging from about 320 to 370 pounds. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 I am a vehicular cyclist. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
André Jute, extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull, overpriced
"Tom Sherman °_°" wrote in message ... Andre Jute wrote: [...] So how come the entire thing is so low that you are stressed out from fear of being splatted not by a bus but by a common low hatchback because the driver didn't see you? Drivers notice trikes much more than run of the mill [run-of-the-mill] bicycles in my experience. The above is not necessarily true. In any event, if and when you get run over, the driver will say for sure that he did not notice you. [...] Customers are offered virtually nothing but extremes, and at outrageous prices. Let us see Mr. Jute build and sell one both at a profit and reasonable price. Recumbents are outrageously overpriced. The very small market for them has a lot to do with it, but still it would be nice if someone would come out with a recumbent for a few hundred dollars instead of the usual thousand dollars or so. [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Recumbents: extreme, unsuitable for purpose, dangerous, dull,overpriced
Edward Dolan wrote:
Tom Sherman Chalo wrote: I've ridden 'bent bikes with 20"/27" and 16"/20" wheels. *The big one had a long floppy frame and gave a shaky but smooth ride. *The small one gave a treacherous and crappy ride that didn't get better despite my days spent trying to make the best of it. There is no stock recumbent suitable for someone Chalo's size. Since Chalo is in the 99.999th percentile in both height and weight, the manufacturers are not missing much of a market. What is Chalo, an 800 lb. gorilla? Gorillas have short enough legs to ride BMX bikes, which works to their advantage. I am forced to be more resourceful than that. I rented a BikeE while I was vacationing in Seattle in early 2001. The reason I rented it was because it was the only rental bike available in Seattle that could be adjusted to fit me. For some reason, Mr. Sherman thinks it was the wrong size for me despite the BikeE thinking it was the right size. I believe it was the right size, but wrong in a more fundamental way. Hence my wife, who's a foot shorter than I am, had no better luck with it than I did. Chalo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If Finish Line Lube is so obviously grossly overpriced, why is it sold in every LBS? | Jay[_2_] | Techniques | 41 | February 1st 08 05:16 PM |
dull | Andre | Racing | 45 | April 20th 07 03:20 PM |
le tour 2006 course is dull. | Michael Press | Racing | 12 | July 9th 06 09:28 PM |
Can you identify this overpriced uni? | wayne | Unicycling | 7 | August 12th 04 03:13 AM |