Euphemism for Illegal Mountain Bike Trails: "Gray Trails"

On Jun 5, 6:59 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:56:25 -0400, "userfriendly"



wrote:
"Wolf Leverich" wrote in message
...
: On 2007-06-05, userfriendly wrote:
:
: http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speec...omplexity.html
:
: Enjoy the education...
:
:
: Quoting Michael Crichton about science is absurd.
:
: He was a pre-med majoring in Anthropology at Harvard. That
: probably doesn't mean anything to an average Joe, but to any
: Harvard graduate that pretty well tells you he's a guy who
: wanted to make it to med school but couldn't cut it in the
: hard sciences.
:
: If you're going to quote someone about science, at least try to
: find a guy who made it past "Physics for Poets".
:
Aaaahhh- attack the source because you can't deal with the facts. Shame-
that one doesn't work on me.

Maybe if you COULD find a reliable source, there might be a reason to
listen. Apparently, you COULDN'T, so you used Michael Crichton
instead.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

But you never have....and please do...still waiting who that source in
Vancouver BC is..maybe some day

:
Aaaahhh- attack the source because you can't deal with the facts.
Shame- that one doesn't work on me.

Maybe if you COULD find a reliable source, there might be a reason to
listen. Apparently, you COULDN'T, so you used Michael Crichton
instead.

Since he put selective words in ALL CAPS, that must make it true.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"y_p_w" wrote in message
oups.com...
: On Jun 5, 9:30 am, "Wolf Leverich" wrote:
: On 2007-06-05, userfriendly wrote:
:
: http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speec...omplexity.html
:
: Enjoy the education...
:
: Quoting Michael Crichton about science is absurd.
:
: He was a pre-med majoring in Anthropology at Harvard. That
: probably doesn't mean anything to an average Joe, but to any
: Harvard graduate that pretty well tells you he's a guy who
: wanted to make it to med school but couldn't cut it in the
: hard sciences.
:
: Crichton is a Harvard Med School graduate. That being said, his
: politics seems to trump any really scientific basis for his claims on
: global warming.

Interesting- since his view is different from yours, you automatically
assume the difference must be political rather than a sincere difference of
belief. Why is that?

: Maybe if you COULD find a reliable source, there might be a reason to
: listen. Apparently, you COULDN'T, so you used Michael Crichton
: instead.

http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220

http://www.junkscience.com/

On 2007-06-06, userfriendly wrote:
: Maybe if you COULD find a reliable source, there might be a reason to
: listen. Apparently, you COULDN'T, so you used Michael Crichton
: instead.

http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm

LOL! That paper is worse than bad science, it was
actually a fraud job that ****ed off the National Academy
of Science.

The authors were Arthur B. Robinson who conducts research
on protein chemistry and on nutrition and predictive and
preventive medicine, Robinson's 22-year-old son, Zachary,
and astrophysicists Sallie L. Baliunas and Willie Soon.

These guys were funded by Scaife, and are employed by a
couple of those right-wing nut factories.

###

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220

Richard Lindzen is one of the few academics with relevant
credentials who disputes global warming.

He also does $2500/day consulting gigs for the oil
industry, and refuses to accept a real-money bets on
the planet's temperature 20 years from now unless
the person on the other side of the bet offers 50:1
odds in Lindzen's favor.

So Lindzen is pretty open about the fact he's whoring
for the oil industry.

###

http://www.junkscience.com/

JunkScience.com is a website maintained by Steven J. Milloy,
an "adjunct scholar" the Cato Institute and the Competitive
Enterprise Institute - right wing think tanks with long
histories of denying environmental problems at the behest of
the corporations which fund them. Milloy is also a columnist
for FoxNews.com.

Milloy is not even close to a climate scientist in training.

Milloy has received thousands of dollars in payments from the
Phillip Morris company since the early nineties (he shilled
for them, arguing tobacco isn't carcenogenic), and NGOs
controlled by Milloy have received large payments from ExxonMobil.

###

These aren't references; these are paid shills for ExxonMobil.
If you want to talk about science, go to the refereed journals,
read the measurements and the interpretations, and then come
back and explain why the actual climate scientists are wrong.

And don't republish bull****. It's as bad as straight-out
being a liar.

Cheers, Wolf.


--
Dr. Brian Leverich Co-moderator, soc.genealogy.methods/GENMTD-L
Angeles Chapter LTC Admin Chair http://angeles.sierraclub.org/ltc/
P.O. Box 6831, Frazier Park, CA 93222-6831

Wolf Leverich wrote:

And don't republish bull****. It's as bad as straight-out
being a liar.

Thus ended all showings of "An Inconvenient Myth"! LOL

On 2007-06-06, Bill Sornson wrote:

Wolf Leverich wrote:

And don't republish bull****. It's as bad as straight-out
being a liar.

Thus ended all showings of "An Inconvenient Myth"! LOL


No substantive response to the fact that your sources were all
nutcases and industry shills, eh? (:

Better luck next time. Cheers, Wolf.


--
Dr. Brian Leverich Co-moderator, soc.genealogy.methods/GENMTD-L
Angeles Chapter LTC Admin Chair http://angeles.sierraclub.org/ltc/
P.O. Box 6831, Frazier Park, CA 93222-6831

Wolf Leverich wrote:
On 2007-06-06, Bill Sornson wrote:

Wolf Leverich wrote:

And don't republish bull****. It's as bad as straight-out
being a liar.

Thus ended all showings of "An Inconvenient Myth"! LOL


No substantive response to the fact that your sources were all
nutcases and industry shills, eh? (:

/MY/ sources?

Better luck next time. Cheers, Wolf.

Better reading comprehension next time. Cheers, BS

"Wolf Leverich" wrote in message
...
: On 2007-06-06, userfriendly wrote:
: : Maybe if you COULD find a reliable source, there might be a reason to
: : listen. Apparently, you COULDN'T, so you used Michael Crichton
: : instead.
:
: http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm
:
: LOL! That paper is worse than bad science, it was
: actually a fraud job that ****ed off the National Academy
: of Science.
:
: The authors were Arthur B. Robinson who conducts research
: on protein chemistry and on nutrition and predictive and
: preventive medicine, Robinson's 22-year-old son, Zachary,
: and astrophysicists Sallie L. Baliunas and Willie Soon.
:
: These guys were funded by Scaife, and are employed by a
: couple of those right-wing nut factories.
:
: ###
:
: http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220
:
: Richard Lindzen is one of the few academics with relevant
: credentials who disputes global warming.
:
: He also does $2500/day consulting gigs for the oil
: industry, and refuses to accept a real-money bets on
: the planet's temperature 20 years from now unless
: the person on the other side of the bet offers 50:1
: odds in Lindzen's favor.
:
: So Lindzen is pretty open about the fact he's whoring
: for the oil industry.
:
: ###
:
: http://www.junkscience.com/
:
: JunkScience.com is a website maintained by Steven J. Milloy,
: an "adjunct scholar" the Cato Institute and the Competitive
: Enterprise Institute - right wing think tanks with long
: histories of denying environmental problems at the behest of
: the corporations which fund them. Milloy is also a columnist
: for FoxNews.com.
:
: Milloy is not even close to a climate scientist in training.
:
: Milloy has received thousands of dollars in payments from the
: Phillip Morris company since the early nineties (he shilled
: for them, arguing tobacco isn't carcenogenic), and NGOs
: controlled by Milloy have received large payments from ExxonMobil.
:
: ###
:
: These aren't references; these are paid shills for ExxonMobil.
: If you want to talk about science, go to the refereed journals,
: read the measurements and the interpretations, and then come
: back and explain why the actual climate scientists are wrong.
:
: And don't republish bull****. It's as bad as straight-out
: being a liar.
:
: Cheers, Wolf.
:
Thanks man- I really appreciate you showing what you really are. It
wouldn't matter who I quoted or what. Anyone who disagrees with the
politically-orthodox point of view is deemed worthless and therefore
discounted. That's the way most religion operates as well. No wonder
Americans trust neither science nor religion.

["Followup-To:" header set to rec.backcountry.]
On 2007-06-06, Bill Sornson wrote:
Wolf Leverich wrote:
On 2007-06-06, Bill Sornson wrote:

Wolf Leverich wrote:

And don't republish bull****. It's as bad as straight-out
being a liar.

Thus ended all showings of "An Inconvenient Myth"! LOL


No substantive response to the fact that your sources were all
nutcases and industry shills, eh? (:

/MY/ sources?

Better luck next time. Cheers, Wolf.

Better reading comprehension next time. Cheers, BS


Touche. (: - Wolf