|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On 4/29/2011 6:46 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote:
On 4/29/2011 2:31 PM, BL wrote: Interesting how Armstrong went after her with his legal team but couldn't crack her. http://bicycling.com/blogs/theselect...game%E2%80%9D/ She comes across as pretty well balanced. You could learn a lot from rereading the article and trying to notice the parts you naturally block out. It'd be a big effort, but it'd pay dividends. She's believable and has a decent perspective. I think when Strickland says that if it's her word against LANCE's then LANCE wins he was speaking in a legal sense. At least that's how I took it. Emma seems to have a different read on it, that Strickland is saying that LANCE is more believable. Fred Flintstein |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On Apr 29, 10:15*pm, Substance McGravitas wrote:
On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? *What woman would say that? *It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. *Very odd. *Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. *She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. *I wonder who's top dog? *=:O Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. I have no...errr...dog in the fight. I was commenting on the words she used. They are funny/strange. All the rest is just doping and it bores me. R |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On 4/29/2011 10:15 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote:
On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? What woman would say that? It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. Very odd. Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. I wonder who's top dog? =:O R Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. Show me where I've taken any of her statements out of context. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On Apr 30, 6:26*am, BL wrote:
On 4/29/2011 10:15 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote: On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? What woman would say that? It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. Very odd. Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. I wonder who's top dog? =:O R Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. Show me where I've taken any of her statements out of context. Out of context isn't a precise account of what she said. Folks with their own agenda, selling newspapers, books, gossip mongers, the "bring down Lance" brigade etc. Her desire was to rid cycling of drugs and the impression that Lance the bully went after her.......well, you can make accusations, but you'd better be able to back them up with facts otherwise you're wide open to attack.....simple as that. She's right...she was very naive. Phil H |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
"BL" wrote in message
... On 4/29/2011 10:15 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote: On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? What woman would say that? It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. Very odd. Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. I wonder who's top dog? =:O R Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. Show me where I've taken any of her statements out of context. You didn't take anything "out" of context so much as create an extremely misleading idea of what the article was actually about. You wouldn't score very high on the verbal SAT if you had read that article and said it was about Lance's legal team being unable to rattle Emma. I don't think you read the article very carefully or you wouldn't have used it to try and support your core belief that the world is rallying against Lance and it's only a matter of time before he falls. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On 4/29/2011 7:55 PM, Fred Flintstein wrote:
On 4/29/2011 6:46 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote: On 4/29/2011 2:31 PM, BL wrote: Interesting how Armstrong went after her with his legal team but couldn't crack her. http://bicycling.com/blogs/theselect...game%E2%80%9D/ She comes across as pretty well balanced. You could learn a lot from rereading the article and trying to notice the parts you naturally block out. It'd be a big effort, but it'd pay dividends. She's believable and has a decent perspective. I think when Strickland says that if it's her word against LANCE's then LANCE wins he was speaking in a legal sense. At least that's how I took it. Emma seems to have a different read on it, that Strickland is saying that LANCE is more believable. Fred Flintstein Agreed. She took it personally and I'm sure it wasn't intended that way. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On 4/30/2011 12:11 PM, Phil H wrote:
On Apr 30, 6:26 am, wrote: On 4/29/2011 10:15 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote: On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? What woman would say that? It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. Very odd. Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. I wonder who's top dog? =:O R Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. Show me where I've taken any of her statements out of context. Out of context isn't a precise account of what she said. Folks with their own agenda, selling newspapers, books, gossip mongers, the "bring down Lance" brigade etc. Her desire was to rid cycling of drugs and the impression that Lance the bully went after her.......well, you can make accusations, but you'd better be able to back them up with facts otherwise you're wide open to attack.....simple as that. She's right...she was very naive. Phil H Re-read what RICO wrote. He said I took what she said out of context. Show me where I have ever taken what she has said out of context. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On 4/30/2011 1:41 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
"BL" wrote in message ... On 4/29/2011 10:15 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote: On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? What woman would say that? It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. Very odd. Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. I wonder who's top dog? =:O R Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. Show me where I've taken any of her statements out of context. You didn't take anything "out" of context so much as create an extremely misleading idea of what the article was actually about. You wouldn't score very high on the verbal SAT if you had read that article and said it was about Lance's legal team being unable to rattle Emma. I don't think you read the article very carefully or you wouldn't have used it to try and support your core belief that the world is rallying against Lance and it's only a matter of time before he falls. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA Each reader will take from her statement what they will. I found the legal hassles given her by Armstrong interesting because of a conversation I had a few years ago with Prentice Steffen in which he gave me the details of Armstrong's legal threats against him. SSDD. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On 4/30/2011 11:44 AM, BL wrote:
On 4/30/2011 12:11 PM, Phil H wrote: On Apr 30, 6:26 am, wrote: On 4/29/2011 10:15 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote: On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? What woman would say that? It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. Very odd. Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. I wonder who's top dog? =:O R Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. Show me where I've taken any of her statements out of context. Out of context isn't a precise account of what she said. Folks with their own agenda, selling newspapers, books, gossip mongers, the "bring down Lance" brigade etc. Her desire was to rid cycling of drugs and the impression that Lance the bully went after her.......well, you can make accusations, but you'd better be able to back them up with facts otherwise you're wide open to attack.....simple as that. She's right...she was very naive. Phil H Re-read what RICO wrote. He said I took what she said out of context. Show me where I have ever taken what she has said out of context. You're not capable of seeing your own misrepresentations. You are not constrained by reality. "Each reader will take from her statement what they will" justifies claiming that she was talking about anything. You claim the article was about Lance's legal team, no reasonable person would read it that way. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Emma Addresses Strickland
On Apr 30, 10:41*am, "Mike Jacoubowsky"
wrote: "BL" wrote in message ... On 4/29/2011 10:15 PM, Substance McGravitas wrote: On 4/29/2011 6:33 PM, RicodJour wrote: On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "Mike wrote: Great read, thanks for the link! Funny that the part you take away from this article is about Lance and his legal team. The article had little to say about that; rather, it was, as your subject line states, Emma addressing Strickland, and the weight the media places on her testimony vs others. The part I found most interesting was this- "Years ago I gave an interview to David Walsh, in which I told him the truth of what I had seen and experienced in my years in cycling. Incidentally, I got paid a small sum of money for all the time I put into helping David." I found this interesting: "But now I am sick to death of journalists and people in the media using my facts to help whatever point they want to get across. They chase me like dogs in heat when they are trying to get their story, then drop me if they’ve got their facts or I won’t elaborate or embellish their story. {snip} For the record, I might not have achieved anything like Lance has—who has? But I live a nice, quiet life running a small business, with my two dogs and my boyfriend." Chase me like a dog in heat? What woman would say that? It's implying she's a female dog - a bitch. Very odd. Then I read the last part - and that explained it all. She's in business with the two dogs (notice the first billing) and her boyfriend. I wonder who's top dog? =:O R Shes's sick of people who wont listen and take her staements out of context - like you and Brian. It ****es her off. That's all she said in the bits you twisted. Show me where I've taken any of her statements out of context. You didn't take anything "out" of context so much as create an extremely misleading idea of what the article was actually about. You wouldn't score very high on the verbal SAT if you had read that article and said it was about Lance's legal team being unable to rattle Emma. I don't think you read the article very carefully or you wouldn't have used it to try and support your core belief that the world is rallying against Lance and it's only a matter of time before he falls. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA Anything BL reads about Lance is subject to his "occupational psychosis." That's just a fancy name for frame of mind but its true that he sees things a particular way because he is convinced of Lance's guilt. Someone with no prejudice would have a hard time deciding if Lance's actions were really bullying Emma or anyone else to keep his secret or protecting his name against false accusations. Phil H |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strickland Believes Armstrong Doped | [email protected] | Racing | 5 | April 13th 11 12:06 AM |
Strickland Believes Armstrong Doped | Fred Flintstein | Racing | 3 | April 8th 11 03:21 PM |
Why is Jeff Strickland an asshole supreme? | Jeff Strickland[_2_] | Social Issues | 30 | September 23rd 10 02:53 AM |
* * * * Achtung Jeff Strickland * * * * | LIBERATOR | Mountain Biking | 0 | April 16th 08 09:54 PM |
Addresses help | Duram | Recumbent Biking | 1 | September 5th 05 04:41 AM |