A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Whites Only"?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 4th 05, 04:00 PM
Elisa Francesca Roselli
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chris Zacho The Wheelman wrote:

Where are all the black riders? What is it about our sport that makes it
so unappealing to an entire race of people?


Could overlap with social class issues. Possibly in poorer neighborhoods, as
in poorer countries, bikes are used as transport because people do not have
the option of cars. So when they become upwardly mobile, they eschew what
they see as symbols of poverty. Among social elites, instead, the bike is
seen as ecological, intellectual and aware. People take it for granted that
they _can_ afford cars, and therefore the bike is the conscious choice of
the green and handsome and fit and hip.

I had a boss of Tunisian extraction for whom this was very true. He was the
first person in his family to have "made it" in Western capitalist terms.
Even though he lived only about 15 minutes from his workplace on foot, he
always drove in with a huge, expensive car. It was a status symbol. I tried
to persuade him to have a green conscience and cycle in, and he understood
me rationally, but just couldn't get his heart into it. Too much like what
he had put behind him.

EFR
Ile de France

Ads
  #12  
Old March 4th 05, 04:12 PM
Brendon M. Troy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"RonSonic" wrote
So ah, what part has he got wrong? snip
Or is your dudgeon all the explanation necessary?


Well, that and the quote, I would have thought.

The implication that all black people are poor, and that all that
all black people are interested in doing for recreation is
basketball (in overpriced shoes, no less). Those (followed up by
more generalization about what "black people like to (do)") were
what I took umbrage at, if it wasn't clear.

-Brendon


  #13  
Old March 4th 05, 04:13 PM
Brendon M. Troy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Elisa Francesca Roselli" wrote
Could overlap with social class issues. Possibly in poorer

neighborhoods, as
in poorer countries, bikes are used as transport because people

do not have
the option of cars. So when they become upwardly mobile, they

eschew what
they see as symbols of poverty. Among social elites, instead,

the bike is
seen as ecological, intellectual and aware. People take it for

granted that
they _can_ afford cars, and therefore the bike is the conscious

choice of
the green and handsome and fit and hip.


This is a more reasonable and sensitively-put potential
explanation for some of the issue (if indeed there even is one);
well-put.

-Brendon


  #14  
Old March 4th 05, 04:31 PM
Bill H.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chris Zacho "The Wheelman" wrote:

Yet at any one of these organizations or events, I could count the

total
number of "Afro-American" riders with the fingers of one hand. The
portion of South Carolina where I live now, according to the latest
census, has a population that is about 60% black. Yet the local club,
which has nearly 100 members, to my knowledge has only one black
cyclist. Hardly an accurate representation of the population at

large.

Nope. But neither is the NBA. Blacks are a minority in this country,
yet they dominate the NBA. You could ask where all the white players
are. To be sure, there ARE whites playing basketball, but at the
professional level whites are a minority.

In fact, I'll be willing to bet, that out of all the posters on this
board, only one, maybe two, max. are black. If indeed anybody here

is.
Where are all the black riders? What is it about our sport that makes

it
so unappealing to an entire race of people?


I don't think it's unappealing, per se. I think it's just cultural. I
would wager that, on the whole, blacks have less interest in bicycling
as a recreational sport than whites. I think every sport, in fact,
tends to be played by one group more than the other. I don't think
this is bad - just the way things are.

-Bill Henry

  #15  
Old March 4th 05, 04:37 PM
RonSonic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:12:32 -0500, "Brendon M. Troy"
wrote:

"RonSonic" wrote
So ah, what part has he got wrong? snip
Or is your dudgeon all the explanation necessary?


Well, that and the quote, I would have thought.

The implication that all black people are poor, and that all that
all black people are interested in doing for recreation is
basketball (in overpriced shoes, no less). Those (followed up by
more generalization about what "black people like to (do)") were
what I took umbrage at, if it wasn't clear.


I really do think it is best if we make it clear. And even willing to play
devil's advocate in that way. So often indignation is used in place of reason
and persuasion. That doesn't work for me and I do call out those things out of
habit.

The OP was, I am sure, being deliberately provocative. But did manage to stay
IMO in fair territory while making a feint for the sideline you were covering.
We'll see if he actually had a point beyond seeing if he could get other people
to argue.

Ron
  #16  
Old March 4th 05, 05:12 PM
Roger Zoul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chris Zacho "The Wheelman" wrote:
I have been riding for over 30 years now. I've been the member of many
clubs, large and small, on both coasts and in the middle. I've been to
and done many organized rides (short, long and "are you nuts?") and
bike rallies boasting attendances ranging from the hundreds to the
thousands.

Yet at any one of these organizations or events, I could count the
total number of "Afro-American" riders with the fingers of one hand.


One hand? Dang!

The portion of South Carolina where I live now, according to the
latest census, has a population that is about 60% black. Yet the
local club, which has nearly 100 members, to my knowledge has only
one black cyclist. Hardly an accurate representation of the
population at large.


You must be down in the low country. I'm in Upstate SC. Sadly, the numbers
here aren't much better (should be ever lower, though). On organized rides
up here, I've seen maybe five (at most) other black folks, and one was a
girl. Two guys I saw seemed to be pretty skilled riders, whereas I'm a
noob. I saw one guy (who claims to have a twin brother who rides, but I
think he was pulling my leg) on different charity ride events.


In fact, I'll be willing to bet, that out of all the posters on this
board, only one, maybe two, max. are black.


Dang! Does that mean I'm just about the only black poster here?

If indeed anybody here is.
Where are all the black riders? What is it about our sport that makes
it so unappealing to an entire race of people?



Anybody have any theories?


Well, I don't claim to have any answers beyond the obvious: Be like Mike.

I personally have no interest in organized team sports, other than cycling,
which I discovered only recently.

I see lots of black guys playing golf on a course along one of my riding
routes. Of course, lots of black guys go to the gym to lift weights and
play basket and racquetball.

I predict that the numbers will increase, though. I'm a regular on the
roads around here and I got my last girlfriend into it. Maybe I can draw my
current girlfriend it, but she's pretty committed to running, so maybe not.
The LA thingie will draw some more in, too, maybe.


  #17  
Old March 4th 05, 05:21 PM
Tom Keats
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
RonSonic writes:

The OP was, I am sure, being deliberately provocative. But did manage to stay
IMO in fair territory while making a feint for the sideline you were covering.
We'll see if he actually had a point beyond seeing if he could get other people
to argue.


Nah, Chris has posted to the newsgroup for quite a while, and
I know he's no troll. I'm sure he has genuinely perceived a
dearth of black cyclists (particularly in club circles,) and
he sincerely and innocently wonders why that is.

I've similarly noticed in my own local experience how
pre-college-aged youth appears to be under-represented
among cyclists, although there seems to be a recent trend
away from that.


cheers,
Tom

--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca
  #18  
Old March 4th 05, 05:25 PM
maxo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 05:00:41 -0500, Chris Zacho "The Wheelman" wrote:

Where are all the black riders?


Quite a few folks of all shades around here on the park paths. Tons of
Xmart bike riders--hey whatever gets you into the sport.


It's a cultural thing as many have said--it's not some dangerous third
rail topic--we can generalize and say that Canadians are more likely to
play hockey than Nicaraguans--and not feel weird about it. LOL

I have seen quite a dramatic increase of black folks on high zoot rides
around here which is interesting...

I've chatted with a few of the black dudes on fancy rides around here, and
indeed a lot of the guys are refugees from "traditionally black" sports
like basketball and football and were recommended cycling by their
trainers or doctors as a lower impact sports.

Cycling is also making into the mainstream and appeals to folks of all
backgrounds--it's not the mysterious sport of nail on cleats and stinky
wool anymore.



  #19  
Old March 4th 05, 05:34 PM
Neil Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

maxo wrote:

It's a cultural thing as many have said--it's not some dangerous third
rail topic--we can generalize and say that Canadians are more likely to
play hockey than Nicaraguans--and not feel weird about it. LOL


I believe that any and all topics should be fodder for discussion in a
reasonable, thoughtful, dispassionate, and intellectual way. That
starts with a tacit agreement that comes only from knowing the rest of
the participants in a discussion fairly well.

This is a pretty incendiary topic--arguably more so than politics
or--dare I say--gruppo manufacturers.

It also calls for the speculation /of/ a large group of people as to
the reasons for the absence of a large group of people, largely absent
that group's participation.

Not inherently unfair. Not even inherently inappropriate. But I
still see Robot, from "Lost In Space" waving his arms . . . .
  #20  
Old March 4th 05, 05:40 PM
Neil Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Neil Brooks wrote:

maxo wrote:

It's a cultural thing as many have said--it's not some dangerous third
rail topic--we can generalize and say that Canadians are more likely to
play hockey than Nicaraguans--and not feel weird about it. LOL


I believe that any and all topics should be fodder for discussion in a
reasonable, thoughtful, dispassionate, and intellectual way. That
starts with a tacit agreement that comes only from knowing the rest of
the participants in a discussion fairly well.

This is a pretty incendiary topic--arguably more so than politics
or--dare I say--gruppo manufacturers.


Let me elaborate he I don't think the topic is inherently
incendiary, based on my first paragraph. I think it's incendiary
based on the potential for ill-conceived, mean spirited responses that
are based more in ignorance, prejudice, preconception, or bigotry than
in any semblance of fact.

Back to the peanut gallery....
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Senior Olympics gcdoss Recumbent Biking 310 August 22nd 04 04:34 PM
Matthew White's "crash" Steve McGinty Racing 1 July 4th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.