|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Comfy performance bikes
Luigi de Guzman wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:14:56 -0500, Doug Cimper wrote: Luigi de Guzman wrote: My ass isn't exactly the same as yours; why should my saddle be? Believe it or not--there are bicycles that basically only come available with ONE seat, and that seat is comfortable enough for the vast majority of humanity. The RANS Zenetic is one such bicycle (although I think there are plastic and carbon-fiber versions, so I suppose that's two seats). ~ RANS recumbents are not universally available. I can't justify the additional cost and hassle (won't fit on bike racks on buses/cars/trains, etc.) Er, the RANS Zenetic is a "crank forward" upright, not a recumbent: http://www.ransbikes.com/07ZTour.htm. They're perfectly sensible bicycles, I'm sure, but the fact is that saddle pain is not a problem if you learn to set up your (diamond-frame) bicycle correctly. For many this may be true. For those who it is not, they likely give up on cycling, which is unfortunate. In my case, it's a cheap fix: study, some time with an allen wrench, and off I go. The proper generic term is "hex key" (right "gotbent"). -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Comfy performance bikes
Luigi de Guzman wrote:
RANS recumbents are not universally available. I can't justify the additional cost and hassle (won't fit on bike racks on buses/cars/trains, etc.) If you are one who is having comfort issues on a normal bike and you go and buy another normal bike, you're going to get the same old aches and pains. Bikes that LOOK the same, HURT the same to ride. Buying a more-expensive bike doesn't even help; expensive bikes are lighter, but they're not any more comfortable. As for the bike rack issue, some have said these bikes fit into a regular bike rack if you flip the front wheel around backwards--but for many people, the transportation aspect may not even be an issue at all. They're perfectly sensible bicycles, I'm sure, but the fact is that saddle pain is not a problem if you learn to set up your (diamond-frame) bicycle correctly. Sorry, not true. We will know the bike companies have figured out how to make a comfortable saddle when all the bike shops stop selling padded shorts. In my case, it's a cheap fix: study, some time with an allen wrench, and off I go. How many riders in the TdF are using padded shorts this year? Why don't you drop on by pre-race and bring your allen wrench, since they seem to be too stupid to figure out things themselves..... ~ |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Comfy performance bikes
In article , DougC wrote:
How many riders in the TdF are using padded shorts this year? Why don't you drop on by pre-race and bring your allen wrench, since they seem to be too stupid to figure out things themselves..... ~ I'm sorry Doug, but that just won't do. We have standards here at rec.bicycling.* and if you wish to hold the position of resident recumbent crank, you're going to have to do much better. Your posts have gotten repetive and boring, they lack style and panache. The padded shorts thing just isn't working in the long run. I suggest adding some black helicopters and a touch of "UCI conspiracy" to your posts. It might be helpful to spend some time at the google archives studying some of the master works of previous holders of the position... _ Booker C. Bense |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Comfy performance bikes
Booker C. Bense wrote:
I'm sorry Doug, but that just won't do. We have standards here at rec.bicycling.* and if you wish to hold the position of resident recumbent crank, you're going to have to do much better. Your posts have gotten repetive and boring, they lack style and panache. I'd have engaged Luigi in a debate, but he doesn't seem to have ever owned or even tried riding the bicycle in question, or anything like it. The solution he offered was was "ride with [your] hands on the brake hoods"... I haven't rode a Zenetic, but I do own a Fusion and I can say that the difference goes way beyond "riding a regular bike on the hoods". The padded shorts thing just isn't working in the long run. Yea, I know--it didn't work for me either. That's why I switched to bicycles that don't require them. ~ |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Comfy performance bikes
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:03:35 -0500, DougC wrote:
The solution he offered was was "ride with [your] hands on the brake hoods"... I haven't rode a Zenetic, but I do own a Fusion and I can say that the difference goes way beyond "riding a regular bike on the hoods". Don't get your shorts--padded or otherwise--in a twist. My reference to my setup and riding position was just so you'd know where I was coming from. It's hardly a *solution* for *you*. It's the set-up I like and prefer and find actually very comfortable, thanks very much. Obviously nothing short of a recumbent gets you on two wheels. More power (and less wind resistance!) to you. If your preferred bicycle puts a grin on your face without putting a crease in your shorts, then I'm happy for you. What I don't understand is the need to grimace with rage when anyone suggests that one might be comfortable on anything but a recumbent bicycle. I am comfortable enough on my ride to ride it all day with a smile on my face--even in liquorbike clothes. If you don't believe that, I don't know what else to tell you. Would I like to try a recumbent one of these days? Sure, if the price is right. I'm familiar with the usual upsides--comfort, aerodynamics, and so forth. Many designs really intrigue me. But here's the kicker: the barrier to entry is pretty high. Recumbents are more expensive compared to comparable conventional diamond-frame bicycles. And, again, since nothing compels me to consider a recumbent--I get by very well with diamond-frame uprights--it's not a priority. If, however, I was unable to ride anything but a recumbent for whatever reason, it's a simple choice: I'd get the recumbent. I'd hate not to be able to ride a bicycle *at all*. Now you can argue till you're blue in the face about the reasons why recumbents aren't more widespread--UCI conspiracies and the rest of it. But none of that wishful thinking translates into dollars in my pocket or shooting pains in my backside--the two things which, jointly or singly, would make me consider a new type of bicycle. =-Luigi -- Luigi de Guzman http://ouij.livejournal.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Comfy performance bikes
"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" wrote in message .. . Luigi de Guzman wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:14:56 -0500, Doug Cimper wrote: Luigi de Guzman wrote: My ass isn't exactly the same as yours; why should my saddle be? Believe it or not--there are bicycles that basically only come available with ONE seat, and that seat is comfortable enough for the vast majority of humanity. The RANS Zenetic is one such bicycle (although I think there are plastic and carbon-fiber versions, so I suppose that's two seats). ~ RANS recumbents are not universally available. I can't justify the additional cost and hassle (won't fit on bike racks on buses/cars/trains, etc.) Er, the RANS Zenetic is a "crank forward" upright, not a recumbent: http://www.ransbikes.com/07ZTour.htm. These type of bikes are an abomination. For Christ's sakes, either get a proper recumbent or stay on your god damn uprights! [...] Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Performance Bikes | catzz66 | General | 30 | June 30th 07 05:20 AM |
Performance Recumbent bikes | [email protected] | Techniques | 0 | February 28th 07 11:57 PM |
Performance Recumbent Bikes are available now. | [email protected] | Recumbent Biking | 1 | February 19th 07 12:08 AM |
New Comfort Performance Bikes | [email protected] | Techniques | 12 | February 27th 05 01:03 PM |
Do good value for performance bikes have to be American? | Jo Stoller | UK | 23 | June 15th 04 08:31 PM |