|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lance Armstrong's chemotherapy
I wonder if anyone has done research on maybe the radiation treatment
on Lance's cancer is why he has produced less lactic acid after the chemo. A friend of mine read somewhere a couple of years ago, there was a test on Lance whereby it found that his body produces less lactic acid than before his cancer treatment. How did he fare in his cycling career before the cancer? Was he a top 10 cyclist? It's just interesting that no physician has thought about maybe the cancer treatment has something to do with his success the last 6 yrs. Heck, if was a pro cyclist, maybe i would want chemo on myself just to see. I do think that Lance would never use drugs, so that assertion is way off base. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
: I wonder if anyone has done research on maybe the radiation treatment : on Lance's cancer is why he has produced less lactic acid after the : chemo. A friend of mine read somewhere a couple of years ago, there was : a test on Lance whereby it found that his body produces less lactic : acid than before his cancer treatment. How did he fare in his cycling : career before the cancer? Was he a top 10 cyclist? It's just : interesting that no physician has thought about maybe the cancer : treatment has something to do with his success the last 6 yrs. Heck, if : was a pro cyclist, maybe i would want chemo on myself just to see. I : do think that Lance would never use drugs, so that assertion is way off : base. 1.) radiation was on the cancer, not on the muscles in his legs. 2.)you can do "chemo" on yourself, but that is not the same as radiation. Pat in TX : |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What about Lance drug treatment of anti-Cancer drug? How do we know that anti-cancer drug is no way helping making his body more strong and more indurance. No doubt Lance has been used durg.. I mean whether anti-cancer drug or not it's still chemicaltheory hat Lance has been used to reorganze his body condition for many years. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... What about Lance drug treatment of anti-Cancer drug? How do we know that anti-cancer drug is no way helping making his body more strong and more indurance. No doubt Lance has been used durg.. I mean whether anti-cancer drug or not it's still chemicaltheory hat Lance has been used to reorganze his body condition for many years. So, what, nobody who's ever been sick should be allowed to race? Or no athlete who gets sick should be given medical treatment? Lance is an extraordinary physical specimen. I saw him win the USPro here in Philadelphia long before the cancer, and you could see it just watching him race. His ferocity and power were palpable, even to the spectators. He's just the guy at the far end of the bell curve. His physical uniqueness and capacity have been well documented both before and after the cancer. Somewhere out there is probably a guy who was born with even more potential than Lance. But he chose to be a ballet dancer or something. What the Lance doubters just don't want to accept is that in Armstrong we have the rare combination of the physique that's optimal for the sport, the will to win, and the incredible series of coincidences that actually put that person on a bike. It's like destiny, or something. RichC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Clark" wrote in message
... So, what, nobody who's ever been sick should be allowed to race? Or no athlete who gets sick should be given medical treatment? Lance is an extraordinary physical specimen. I saw him win the USPro here in Philadelphia long before the cancer, and you could see it just watching him race. His ferocity and power were palpable, even to the spectators. He's just the guy at the far end of the bell curve. His physical uniqueness and capacity have been well documented both before and after the cancer. Somewhere out there is probably a guy who was born with even more potential than Lance. But he chose to be a ballet dancer or something. What the Lance doubters just don't want to accept is that in Armstrong we have the rare combination of the physique that's optimal for the sport, the will to win, and the incredible series of coincidences that actually put that person on a bike. It's like destiny, or something. RichC Rich, I think you're exactly right. But also, factor in that the cancer actually did something to transform him as a racer. He lost all that upper-body muscle he carried as hold-over from his triathlon days and, from there, he was able to dramatically improve his power to weight ratio. Voila ... instant monster climber! -- Bob C. "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts." T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting thoughts from everyone. Anyways, he should be well on his
way to his 7th title here soon. Later. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The word is out: It's over. | packfiller | Racing | 3 | October 15th 04 06:22 PM |
L.A. Confidential Excerpt | 'Dis Guy | Racing | 3 | October 10th 04 05:31 AM |
European reaction towards Lance Armstrong's Win | Larry | Racing | 46 | August 10th 04 07:28 AM |
LANCE ARMSTRONG'S BID FOR COVETED SIXTH TOUR DE FRANCE FOILED | Richard Longwood | Racing | 6 | June 28th 04 03:06 AM |
Lance comments on Wilson | Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer | Racing | 2 | March 2nd 04 02:53 AM |