A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Disc brakes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 8th 07, 05:08 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
CB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default Disc brakes

I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
it just occured to me.....

Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
one is bent?

Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......

Ads
  #2  
Old February 8th 07, 05:25 AM posted to alt.mountain-bike
Phil, Non-Squid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default Disc brakes

CB wrote:
I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
it just occured to me.....

Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
one is bent?

Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......


For MTBs, it's hard to wear down a SS rotor down to the minimum wear limit.
I did a quick search and was unable to find any values for minimum
thickness. There's a chance, however, that it may be printed on the rotor
itself, as they are on motorcycle disc brakes. Examine it closely for such
information.

--
Phil


  #3  
Old February 8th 07, 07:59 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 287
Default Disc brakes

On Feb 7, 10:08 pm, "CB" wrote:
I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
it just occured to me.....

Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
one is bent?

Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......


I posted this sometime last summer. ...

One of the former Shimano USA tech reps gave out the the number of .
20
mm from the nominal width I believe.

This is based on the rotor not being out of true or scored, both of
which tend to end the life of a rotor long before a reduction in
thickness.


Also consider that, given the semi-industrial standard (there was
one?)
of 2 mm, various rotors seem to run nominal widths of between 1.80 mm
and 2.2 mm. So knowing what the nomial width that you started with
would be key. Current Shimano rotors seem to be coming in at 2.0 mm,
but the older RT75's that I have listed were coming in at the low end
....1.8 mm.


Just for the fun of it here are a few numbers that we came up with
while doing some brake trials. small n ... 4 rotors measured for each
average.


Avid Stainless 1.9 mm
Aztec Stainless 2.0 mm
Shinamo SM-RT61 1.8 mm
Shimano SM-RT75 1.8 mm
Shimano SM-RT77 1.8 mm
Shimano SM-RT96 1.8 mm
Shakamuri Ti 2.0 mm
Stan's Al 2.1

R
What was once old is new again.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disc Brakes - pad touching disc [email protected] Mountain Biking 2 March 21st 06 01:41 PM
Might Dump Road Disc Brakes for Rim Brakes mykal Techniques 24 July 7th 05 05:48 PM
'V' Brakes vs Mechanical Disc Brakes Ian Brown Mountain Biking 14 May 31st 04 08:09 PM
disc brakes on front, v-brakes on rear Per Elmsäter Mountain Biking 24 October 21st 03 10:42 PM
Anyone put disc brakes on a V-Rex? John Foltz Recumbent Biking 22 July 31st 03 10:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.