A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rear rack for MTB



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 04, 09:31 PM
Brian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

Assuming that I'm going to go for the Claud Butler Rock in 22" frame, what
sort of rear rack would be recommended? Not sure if the frame has mounts
for a rack or not though.

Why would I want a rack on my mtb? Well one of my plans is to do some
cycle camping, so being able to split the load of tent + camping gear
between backpack & panniers would be good. Is there such a thing as a
"quick release" rack? So I could only use it when I need to?

Also looking for suggestions of decent panniers (I do have an old pair of
Edinburgh Bicyle Panniers but i'll be sellign these with my old bike)

Thanks in advance

--
Brian
Ads
  #2  
Old August 3rd 04, 12:08 AM
Simon Brooke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

in message , Brian
') wrote:

Assuming that I'm going to go for the Claud Butler Rock in 22" frame,
what
sort of rear rack would be recommended? Not sure if the frame has
mounts for a rack or not though.

Why would I want a rack on my mtb? Well one of my plans is to do some
cycle camping, so being able to split the load of tent + camping gear
between backpack & panniers would be good.


I'd strongly advise against carrying any significant weight in a
rucksack when cycling. You can injure your back most unpleasantly that
way. Keep the weight as far as possible on the bike (or, better but
more expensive) on a trailer. The Claud Butler probably has rack
mounting brazeons; if not, you can get racks (e.g. Old Man Mountain
URL:http://www.carradice.co.uk/old-man-mountain-racks.htm which fit
onto the brake bosses.

If you're carrying significant weight on the bike it will handle better
if you balance the weight between front and rear panniers, although
again this is more expense.

Is there such a thing as a
"quick release" rack? So I could only use it when I need to?


Ish. You can get racks which mount onto the seatpost with a
quick-release clip but they won't take much weight, and wouldn't be any
good at all for what you want to do.

--
(Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
;; This email may contain confidential or otherwise privileged
;; information, though, quite frankly, if you're not the intended
;; recipient and you've got nothing better to do than read other
;; folks' emails then I'm glad to have brightened up your sad little
;; life a tiny bit.
  #3  
Old August 3rd 04, 12:35 AM
chris French
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

In message , Simon
Brooke writes
in message , Brian
') wrote:


Is there such a thing as a
"quick release" rack? So I could only use it when I need to?


Ish. You can get racks which mount onto the seatpost with a
quick-release clip but they won't take much weight, and wouldn't be any
good at all for what you want to do.

Even a bolted on rack shouldn't take long to fit or remove.

Just 4 (or sometimes 3) Allen bolts to undo/do up - can be on or off in
couple of minutes
--
Chris French, Leeds
  #4  
Old August 3rd 04, 01:19 AM
Pete Biggs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

Brian wrote:
Assuming that I'm going to go for the Claud Butler Rock in 22" frame,
what sort of rear rack would be recommended? Not sure if the frame
has mounts for a rack or not though.

Why would I want a rack on my mtb? Well one of my plans is to do some
cycle camping, so being able to split the load of tent + camping gear
between backpack & panniers would be good. Is there such a thing as a
"quick release" rack? So I could only use it when I need to?


A normal proper rack will do the job better and will only take a few
minutes to refit. The _initial_ fitting can be fiddly as adjustments need
to be made but not all the screws will need undoing when you take it off
again.

Blackburn TR-1 TrailRack* is one that should do, although you might
possibly want something stronger/different.

* url:http://www.settlecycles.co.uk/bespok...r1.html?pid=70

(I think it comes with clips for frames without braze-ons, or they might
be available separately).

~PB


  #5  
Old August 3rd 04, 07:26 AM
Brian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

Simon Brooke wrote in news:tut2u1-s7a.ln1
@gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk:



I'd strongly advise against carrying any significant weight in a
rucksack when cycling. You can injure your back most unpleasantly that
way.



Oooh, I'll keep that in mind then - possibly just put spare clothing in the
rucksack, rest of the camping gear on the bike.

Thanks for the reply - I now know that quick release racks won't be
suitable - I'll probably just keep the rack on.

cheers

--
Brian
  #6  
Old August 3rd 04, 09:07 AM
Peter Clinch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

Brian wrote:
Assuming that I'm going to go for the Claud Butler Rock in 22" frame, what
sort of rear rack would be recommended? Not sure if the frame has mounts
for a rack or not though.


The Boor Yueh cheap knock-offs of Blackburns are, IME, fine. That's
what graces my MTB, anyway.

Why would I want a rack on my mtb?


To carry stuff? As with any bikes bar those used for maximum speed, the
main reason /not/ to have a rack on an MTB is fashion and peer pressure
(they don't look sporty).

Is there such a thing as a
"quick release" rack? So I could only use it when I need to?


Unless you're getting seriously serious I doubt you'd notice an alloy
rack is there, aside from it keeping a bit more mud off you. You can
use a seatpost rack or an SQR bag, but a rack with multi-point fixing
will be more stable and not let the luggage move around so much with
"interesting" balance results.

Also looking for suggestions of decent panniers (I do have an old pair of
Edinburgh Bicyle Panniers but i'll be sellign these with my old bike)


For mountain biking, where being able to clean cack off and keeping
things dry will be more important than on the road (where one tends to
ride through fewer rivers), so you could do far worse than Ortlieb roll
tops. The shiny ones are a little cheaper, a bit heavier and a bit
tougher than the "plus" models. Vau De do similar, IMHO the Ortliebs
are a bit nicer and the fixing systems are easier to use, but OTOH the
Orts do cost more. Ortlieb also sell a rucksack conversion, so on trips
with less kit you can take one pannier and if you want to change it to
"sprung weight" for balancy bits then swap it onto your back.

Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  #7  
Old August 3rd 04, 12:22 PM
chris French
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

In message , Peter Clinch
writes
Brian wrote:
Assuming that I'm going to go for the Claud Butler Rock in 22" frame,
what sort of rear rack would be recommended? Not sure if the frame
has mounts for a rack or not though.


The Boor Yueh cheap knock-offs of Blackburns are, IME, fine. That's
what graces my MTB, anyway.


Cheap aluminium alloy racks are fine, though I do prefer the Cro-mo tube
racks now such as Tubus etc. However, these are more money so I wouldn't
suggest someone buy one unless they were sure that is what they want.
--
Chris French, Leeds
  #8  
Old August 3rd 04, 10:48 PM
James Annan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

Simon Brooke wrote:

I'd strongly advise against carrying any significant weight in a
rucksack when cycling. You can injure your back most unpleasantly that
way.


Come off it. Is this some old wives' tale?

James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

  #9  
Old August 3rd 04, 11:35 PM
Simon Brooke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rear rack for MTB

in message , James Annan
') wrote:

Simon Brooke wrote:

I'd strongly advise against carrying any significant weight in a
rucksack when cycling. You can injure your back most unpleasantly
that way.


Come off it. Is this some old wives' tale?


No indeed. I have done it, and won't ever repeat it. An osteopath sorted
me out afterwards, but good though osteopaths are I see no reason for
putting any more business their way than is _strictly_ necessary.

Oh, yes, and, before anyone asks, well packed good Karrimor rucksack
with frame and straps properly adjusted for me. Fortunately the
rucksack fitted very nicely on my bikehod trailer, so the problem never
arose again.

--
(Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

'graveyards are full of indispensable people'

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rack questions har Techniques 14 June 25th 04 09:18 PM
Wieght/aero-weenie rear rack Rick Onanian General 9 April 11th 04 02:52 AM
Braking Technique asqui Racing 55 July 25th 03 04:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.