|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
Perhaps this was approached from the wrong
angle, if one desires wide tires, perhaps one should get a 28" MTB steel frame and only have the gear loaded the same way? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
Perhaps this was approached from the wrong
angle, if one desires wide tires, perhaps one should get a 28" MTB steel frame and only have the gear loaded the same way? Or 27.5", whatever. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
On 6/3/2018 12:20 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Perhaps this was approached from the wrong angle, if one desires wide tires, perhaps one should get a 28" MTB steel frame and only have the gear loaded the same way? Some people believe, "If a little bit is good, a lot is even better!" If you are among them, why stop at a puny runt of a 28" wheel? http://blog.truebikes.eu/wp-content/...-copertina.jpg -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
AMuzi wrote:
Some people believe, "If a little bit is good, a lot is even better!" If you are among them, why stop at a puny runt of a 28" wheel? http://blog.truebikes.eu/wp-content/...-copertina.jpg OK. Do you have smaller chainrings on that to compensate for the wheel circumference, like with the small wheelers, only the other way around? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
On Sun, 03 Jun 2018 12:35:12 -0500, AMuzi wrote:
On 6/3/2018 12:20 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: Perhaps this was approached from the wrong angle, if one desires wide tires, perhaps one should get a 28" MTB steel frame and only have the gear loaded the same way? Some people believe, "If a little bit is good, a lot is even better!" If you are among them, why stop at a puny runt of a 28" wheel? http://blog.truebikes.eu/wp-content/...-copertina.jpg How wide a tire do you need? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGGlODF7_RY (3:05) Anything worth doing, is also worth overdoing. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
How wide a tire do you need? I don't need especially wide tires. Just not 32 and preferably wider than 35. Shooting from the holster, I'd say my prefered tire size is 622-40, 622-42, or 622-47. But this is me just projecting the project based on my general experience and what I've read. I never did any randonneuring whatsoever on any bike! -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
On Sun, 03 Jun 2018 20:06:31 +0200, Emanuel Berg
wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: How wide a tire do you need? I don't need especially wide tires. Just not 32 and preferably wider than 35. Shooting from the holster, I'd say my prefered tire size is 622-40, 622-42, or 622-47. Methinks they are the same as 28x1.50, 28x1.60, and 28x1.75. Looking at Schwalbe touring tires, they're available in those sizes in a variety of tread patterns. https://www.schwalbetires.com/bike_tires/road_tires Perhaps custom rims might be a solution. Something like this: http://www.spontaneousfire.com/trikeofdeath.htm For normal riding, you only install one tire on the extra wide rim. For heavy loads or touring, you install two tires. This arrangement might also provide useful redundancy in the event you get a flat tire. I think 3 side by side tires might be better than two. Soon, everyone will be riding on extra wide rims and multiple tires. But this is me just projecting the project based on my general experience and what I've read. I never did any randonneuring whatsoever on any bike! Neither have I, and it shows. However, I have done some touring and bicycle camping in the distant past. Prior to these adventures, I did read some books and magazine articles on touring. I then ignored most of the advice and did what I thought best, with predictable results. Incidentally, I also used my touring bicycle to do local service calls in my computer repair business. At the time, computers were still too big and heavy to be effectively transported on a bicycle. I also had to carry several filing boxes full of floppy disks and a mess of tools. Leaving anything on a parked bicycle was a security problem. I might try it again as the computers are much smaller today and all the software I need are now on about five USB flash drives. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
I don't need especially wide tires. Just not 32 and preferably wider than 35. Shooting from the holster, I'd say my prefered tire size is 622-40, 622-42, or 622-47. Methinks they are the same as 28x1.50, 28x1.60, and 28x1.75. I think you are right: 47-622 28 x 1.75 x 2 47-622 28 x 1-5/8 x 1-3/4 700x45C 28x1.75 47-622 27 x 1.75 700x45C 42-622 28 x 1-5/8 700x40C 40-622 28 x 1-5/8 x 1-1/2 700x38C These digits BTW are simply what I have found on tires so there is no attempt at normalizing the English sizes. It seems sometimes they say 1-3/4 and sometimes 1.75. I also have these: 37-622 28 x 15/8 x 13/8 700x35C 32-622 28 x 14/8 x 10/8 Perhaps just lack of standardization/normalization behind those "more than 8 eights" fractions...? Some of the decimals seem to be unexpressable (cleanly) as eights or sixteenths tho? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2018 12:35:12 -0500, AMuzi wrote: On 6/3/2018 12:20 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote: Perhaps this was approached from the wrong angle, if one desires wide tires, perhaps one should get a 28" MTB steel frame and only have the gear loaded the same way? Some people believe, "If a little bit is good, a lot is even better!" If you are among them, why stop at a puny runt of a 28" wheel? http://blog.truebikes.eu/wp-content/...-copertina.jpg How wide a tire do you need? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGGlODF7_RY (3:05) Anything worth doing, is also worth overdoing. Brilliant rim and drivetrain design, but it seems to disprove the "big wheels/wide tires have less rolling resistance" hypothesis. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
MTB randonneur
On Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 12:20:19 PM UTC-5, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Perhaps this was approached from the wrong angle, if one desires wide tires, perhaps one should get a 28" MTB steel frame and only have the gear loaded the same way? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 Stop using the word "randonneur". As for wanting wide tires, which seems to be your only goal. That is easy. With the advent of 29", 700C mountain bikes, there are many wide bike tires for every wheel size. You can get many 26" or 700C bikes that will accommodate 1.9" or 2.1" wide tires. That is 48 and 53 mm wide. I'm guessing there are slightly skinnier 700C tires available too. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
randonneur | Emanuel Berg[_2_] | Techniques | 143 | June 7th 18 03:26 AM |
New randonneur handlebar | bcdrums | Techniques | 7 | June 17th 10 11:02 AM |
Vivente World randonneur | burnt | Australia | 6 | April 17th 07 08:39 AM |
mongoose randonneur | [email protected] | Australia | 1 | March 8th 07 11:07 AM |
Mongoose Randonneur LE Pro | noom | Australia | 1 | March 7th 07 10:43 AM |