#1
|
|||
|
|||
Table.
I never did get to find out where I was on the table of rejected posters
in another place, but I think I might have noticed an anomaly. I posted an absolutely hilarious quip about MattB when I said "too many words..." It was sidesplittingly funny and worthy of Oscar Wilde at his best, and it was accepted! Showing that the moderators are men ( all men, odd?) of great taste and discretion. Flushed with my success, I used the same line (That sort of thing worked for Bernard Manning for decades) again about 33.3, but it was rejected for being "inflammatory" showing that either the moderators are men( No women, odd?) with no taste whatsoever, or that they have different standards depending on what sort of Troll is continuing to rattle on without evidence, not listening to others, whilst stating that they ( and only they) have THE answer. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Table.
In article ,
Marc wrote: I never did get to find out where I was on the table of rejected posters in another place, but I think I might have noticed an anomaly. There will always be anomalies, unfortunately. But urc isn't the right place to discuss them. I have crossposted to unnm and set followups. Flushed with my success, I used the same line (That sort of thing worked for Bernard Manning for decades) again about 33.3, but it was rejected Along these lines, we'll see whether the moderators approve my own joke in response to 36's exciting and novel views about chain maintenance. -- Ian Jackson personal email: These opinions are my own. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/ PGP2 key 1024R/0x23f5addb, fingerprint 5906F687 BD03ACAD 0D8E602E FCF37657 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Table.
Ian Jackson wrote:
In article , Marc wrote: I never did get to find out where I was on the table of rejected posters in another place, but I think I might have noticed an anomaly. There will always be anomalies, unfortunately. But urc isn't the right place to discuss them. I disagree, I'm a cyclist, you're a cyclist, the moderators of URCM are cyclists, URCM is a cycling NG , URC is a NG where cyclists discuss things of interest to cyclists, URCM is of interest to me, I'm a cyclist, and we are back to the start. I have crossposted to unnm and set followups. And I have changed them back, I don't subscribe to unnm, and I think it's arrogant in the extreme to alter the followup in that way. URCM is your bailiwick , you set it up so that you could set the rules. This is a different place, it doesn't play to your rules. Flushed with my success, I used the same line (That sort of thing worked for Bernard Manning for decades) again about 33.3, but it was rejected Along these lines, we'll see whether the moderators approve my own joke in response to 36's exciting and novel views about chain maintenance. To be honest, now that I have stopped reading his bull**** in URCM I find him hilarious, what's less so is the fact that he's allowed to perpetuate the bull****, that isn't behaviour that you would accept from the other trolls ( making assertions without basis, demanding evidence from other whilst not providing himself) and I'm amazed that you have let him get away with it for so long. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Table.
Marc wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote: In article , Marc wrote: I never did get to find out where I was on the table of rejected posters in another place, but I think I might have noticed an anomaly. There will always be anomalies, unfortunately. But urc isn't the right place to discuss them. I disagree, I'm a cyclist, you're a cyclist, the moderators of URCM are cyclists, URCM is a cycling NG , URC is a NG where cyclists discuss things of interest to cyclists, URCM is of interest to me, I'm a cyclist, and we are back to the start. I say it's got **** all to do with URC. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Table.
Happi Monday wrote:
Marc wrote: Ian Jackson wrote: In article , Marc wrote: I never did get to find out where I was on the table of rejected posters in another place, but I think I might have noticed an anomaly. There will always be anomalies, unfortunately. But urc isn't the right place to discuss them. I disagree, I'm a cyclist, you're a cyclist, the moderators of URCM are cyclists, URCM is a cycling NG , URC is a NG where cyclists discuss things of interest to cyclists, URCM is of interest to me, I'm a cyclist, and we are back to the start. I say it's got **** all to do with URC. Yes, but everyone ignores you. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Table.
Marc wrote:
Happi Monday wrote: Marc wrote: Ian Jackson wrote: In article , Marc wrote: I never did get to find out where I was on the table of rejected posters in another place, but I think I might have noticed an anomaly. There will always be anomalies, unfortunately. But urc isn't the right place to discuss them. I disagree, I'm a cyclist, you're a cyclist, the moderators of URCM are cyclists, URCM is a cycling NG , URC is a NG where cyclists discuss things of interest to cyclists, URCM is of interest to me, I'm a cyclist, and we are back to the start. I say it's got **** all to do with URC. Yes, but everyone ignores you. Including you, by the look of it :-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Table.
Happi Monday wrote:
Marc wrote: Ian Jackson wrote: In article , Marc wrote: I never did get to find out where I was on the table of rejected posters in another place, but I think I might have noticed an anomaly. There will always be anomalies, unfortunately. But urc isn't the right place to discuss them. I disagree, I'm a cyclist, you're a cyclist, the moderators of URCM are cyclists, URCM is a cycling NG , URC is a NG where cyclists discuss things of interest to cyclists, URCM is of interest to me, I'm a cyclist, and we are back to the start. I say it's got **** all to do with URC. Which is why our resident sub-bridge resident is encouraging others go and have a look at a non-event. -- Its never too late to reinvent the bicycle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Now that's a table! | Bob Downie | UK | 4 | April 16th 07 06:23 PM |
My new coffee table | Tom Crispin | UK | 15 | November 3rd 06 09:48 AM |
Jump Picnic table | irvinegr | Unicycling | 38 | September 2nd 06 06:46 AM |
Jump Picnic table | forrestunifreak | Unicycling | 0 | August 18th 06 03:40 AM |
Inversion Table | Bill B | Recumbent Biking | 3 | October 22nd 04 03:59 AM |