#1
|
|||
|
|||
Clip on Shoes?
I bike for exercise; nothing serious, maybe 25 miles per day. No racing and
very little off road stuff. I have a very early MTB which is sturdy enough. I just want to get my miles in every day and am not interested in saving a few grams on weight here and there or having a jersey to match my helmet and frame. I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob Marley" wrote in
: I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? What are you wearing now? Real cycling shoes are more comfortable than sneakers since they don't flex when you pedal. If you're already using toe clips with real cycling shoes, clipless pedals are not a lot more efficient. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Marley wrote:
I bike for exercise; nothing serious, maybe 25 miles per day. No racing and very little off road stuff. I have a very early MTB which is sturdy enough. I just want to get my miles in every day and am not interested in saving a few grams on weight here and there or having a jersey to match my helmet and frame. I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? When I was younger I rode with the cage type toeclips. When I got back into riding I first used two bikes with plain pedals, and wore running shoes. I really felt I couldn't pedal as steadily, fearing my feet would slip off the pedals (though they never did). I bought a new bike and went all the way to bike shoes that click onto the pedal, and it really is a freer feeling. I bike for exercise though I am fairly interested in going faster and farther in order to get in better shape. Pam |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Marley said...
I bike for exercise; nothing serious, maybe 25 miles per day. No racing and very little off road stuff. I have a very early MTB which is sturdy enough. I just want to get my miles in every day and am not interested in saving a few grams on weight here and there or having a jersey to match my helmet and frame. I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? You didn't explain what you are using now or what you mean mean by shoe/pedal clip. There are the old style toe clips and straps which are only used by a few hold-outs now, and clipless shoes and pedals. The clipless pedals have a mechanism to bind the shoe to the pedal much like a ski binding. You need special cycling shoes which allow a cleat to be bolted to the shoe to fit the pedal mechanism. For your description of your riding, don't waste your money. Clipless has a painful learning curve which will have you falling down and cursing for a while until you get proficient with them. Oh, and your new pedals are the first thing to hit the ground when you fall over, although it might actually be the rear derailleur. You can spend anywhere from $50 to $400 for a set of clipless pedals and shoes. Like anything else, you more or less get what you pay for, but good sales on shoes especially are easy to find. If you ride fast and hard and try to explore your limits, which doesn't sound like your description, then clipless definitely adds to the high performance experience...until you have to take your foot off the pedal. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 08:31:30 -0700, Bob Marley wrote:
I bike for exercise; nothing serious, maybe 25 miles per day. No racing and very little off road stuff. I have a very early MTB which is sturdy enough. I just want to get my miles in every day and am not interested in saving a few grams on weight here and there or having a jersey to match my helmet and frame. I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? 25 miles a day is quite a bit! You certainly can benefit from clipless: You can utilize more muscle groups, adding efficiency and giving a better workout. They're safer, once you get used to them--no slipping off the pedal. No more pressure points and sore feet, if you find shoes that fit well. Folks will no-doubtedly post that you've got to spend so and so amount of dollars for a set of pedals shoes, and I'll add my 2c: I've owned half a dozen pairs of cyling shoes over the years, Diaddoras, Lakes, and [gasp] Bata. Recently, I needed a pair of shoes/ pedals to tide me over while looking for a fresh pair of vintage NOS shoes for my clip pedals. I got the Nashbar housebrand road shoes and cheap mtb pedals. Total cost on sale was 52 dollars. The pedals are made by wellgo, and the shoes by Lake, which was lucky since I've owned two pairs of Lake cyclocross shoes in the past and love the way they fit (they cost $120+ and feel exactly like the Nashbar shoes). I gave up on my search and am sticking with clipless, the cheap Nashbar shoes fit me that well. The pedals simply work, they're a classic move-along-nothing-exciting-here design, and at under 20 bucks a pop, I can afford to put them on my other two bikes. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:08:06 GMT, SuperSlinky wrote:
Bob Marley said... I bike for exercise; nothing serious, maybe 25 miles per day. No racing and very little off road stuff. I have a very early MTB which is sturdy enough. I just want to get my miles in every day and am not interested in saving a few grams on weight here and there or having a jersey to match my helmet and frame. I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? You didn't explain what you are using now or what you mean mean by shoe/pedal clip. There are the old style toe clips and straps which are only used by a few hold-outs now, and clipless shoes and pedals. The clipless pedals have a mechanism to bind the shoe to the pedal much like a ski binding. You need special cycling shoes which allow a cleat to be bolted to the shoe to fit the pedal mechanism. For your description of your riding, don't waste your money. Clipless has a painful learning curve which will have you falling down and cursing for a while until you get proficient with them. Oh, and your new pedals are the first thing to hit the ground when you fall over, although it might actually be the rear derailleur. You can spend anywhere from $50 to $400 for a set of clipless pedals and shoes. Like anything else, you more or less get what you pay for, but good sales on shoes especially are easy to find. If you ride fast and hard and try to explore your limits, which doesn't sound like your description, then clipless definitely adds to the high performance experience...until you have to take your foot off the pedal. I've heard it mentioned here that by not using toeclips you miss about 50% of the optimal cycling experience and by going from toeclips to clipless you gain another 50%. Now make what you will of the term 'optimal cycling experience' - I'm just making that up. Let's just say that it's a large noticeable difference to go from tennis shoes and plain pedals to toeclips - it affected my pedalling style and cadence immensely. I would presume that going from toeclips to clipless would also be a noticeable difference, though not as large - IOW I doubt if my pedalling style would change, but I would suspect my efficiency would improve markedly. I'm planning to upgrade to clipless in the next year when I go from a hybrid to a road bike. I'm still learning basic bike handling, so I'm sticking with toeclips for a while. ;-) Anyway, imagine an engine where the movement arms are only loosely attached both horizontally and laterally to the motor shaft, vs one where the movement arms are tightly attached. Well with plain pedals, and with toeclips, you'd be loosely attached part of the time, even if you emphasized the various tricks of pedalling in a circle, and using all the leg muscles. With clipless, you'd be tightly attached, and have no slush, no appreciable sideways movement, and since the shoes have non-flex soles, you'd not have that flex. After a year or so, most improvement on the bike comes in small, almost tiny increments - we can only tell by monitoring mileage and keeping a log. Once you've maximized other factors, such as weight loss, and bike handling, why neglect any improvement to be gained by a simple upgrade of equipment? YMMV, but that's my current take on it, FWIW. -B |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:08:06 GMT, SuperSlinky
wrote: Bob Marley said... I bike for exercise; nothing serious, maybe 25 miles per day. No racing and very little off road stuff. I have a very early MTB which is sturdy enough. I just want to get my miles in every day and am not interested in saving a few grams on weight here and there or having a jersey to match my helmet and frame. I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? You didn't explain what you are using now or what you mean mean by shoe/pedal clip. There are the old style toe clips and straps which are only used by a few hold-outs now, Including 'hold-outs' who like to have a bike that is used as everyday transportation. I have one bike that I keep as my 'hold-out' bike so that when I want to run to the post office or to the store I can just hope on. I don't have to change into special bicycling shoes. If I bike to a movie, my shoes don't scrunch and click on the sidewalk, etc., etc. Anyway, I think toe clips have a valid place. They provide options that clipless pedals don't. Many people don't want to have to change into bicycle-specific clothing just to ride their bike. and clipless shoes and pedals. The clipless pedals have a mechanism to bind the shoe to the pedal much like a ski binding. You need special cycling shoes which allow a cleat to be bolted to the shoe to fit the pedal mechanism. For your description of your riding, don't waste your money. Clipless has a painful learning curve which will have you falling down and cursing for a while until you get proficient with them. Oh, and your new pedals are the first thing to hit the ground when you fall over, although it might actually be the rear derailleur. You can spend anywhere from $50 to $400 for a set of clipless pedals and shoes. Like anything else, you more or less get what you pay for, but good sales on shoes especially are easy to find. If you ride fast and hard and try to explore your limits, which doesn't sound like your description, then clipless definitely adds to the high performance experience...until you have to take your foot off the pedal. Am I the only person who learned to use clipless without any falling? Some attentive practice, riding in calm places for a couple of hours, etc., etc. It was five years before I took a tumble because I couldn't unclip, and that was primarily because of an unbalanced load on a severe hill and tipping to my unpracticed side. I am not sure if I would have gotten out of loose clips in that situation. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 08:31:30 -0700, "Bob Marley"
wrote: I bike for exercise; nothing serious, maybe 25 miles per day. No racing and very little off road stuff. I have a very early MTB which is sturdy enough. I just want to get my miles in every day and am not interested in saving a few grams on weight here and there or having a jersey to match my helmet and frame. I was wondering, however, about the shoe/ pedal clip things. Is there really enough advantage for a casual rider like me to invest in them? They allow you to pull up with force. On a fitness level, I would think that this gives a somewhat more balanced workout to the calves and other leg muscles. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:26:58 GMT, maxo wrote:
You can utilize more muscle groups, adding efficiency and giving a better workout. They're safer, once you get used to them--no slipping off the pedal. No more pressure points and sore feet, if you find shoes that fit well. Folks will no-doubtedly post that you've got to spend so and so amount of dollars for a set of pedals shoes, and I'll add my 2c: I've owned half a dozen pairs of cyling shoes over the years, Diaddoras, Lakes, and [gasp] Bata. Recently, I needed a pair of shoes/ pedals to tide me over while looking for a fresh pair of vintage NOS shoes for my clip pedals. I got the Nashbar housebrand road shoes and cheap mtb pedals. Total cost on sale was 52 dollars. The pedals are made by wellgo, and the shoes by Lake, which was lucky since I've owned two pairs of Lake cyclocross shoes in the past and love the way they fit (they cost $120+ and feel exactly like the Nashbar shoes). I gave up on my search and am sticking with clipless, the cheap Nashbar shoes fit me that well. The pedals simply work, they're a classic move-along-nothing-exciting-here design, and at under 20 bucks a pop, I can afford to put them on my other two bikes. Thanks a bunch for the specifics. I'm starting to contemplate the move from toeclips. Looking at the nashbar site, it appears most of the Lake MTB cycling shoes are lace-up. One of the big advantages I'm looking for in going to a biking shoe would be the velcro, easy-on aspect; no flopping laces or struggling to tie your shoes when very tired (say if you've changed socks). However I still like the idea of MTB shoes, b/c of the recessed cleats. I need to be able to walk without tripping when tired (leg injury). Do you have a specific link for the shoes? I might be looking in the wrong place. On the pedals, I'd favor the type where you can ride regular pedals, then flip them over and clip in. Are the wellgo pedals like this? As you go cheaper in the pedals do you sacrifice important features, adjustability, durability? The probably is a price break point for both shoes and pedals where you'er not getting anything fancy, but the basic needed elements are there. This is where I'd aim, I guess, unless I found a specific pair that worked really well for me and my peculiarities (such as structural leg or ankle alignment irregularities - my left leg tends to twist outwards). Thanks again. Always nice to have specifics and anecdotes on this kind of thing. -B |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Dan Daniel wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:08:06 GMT, SuperSlinky wrote: For your description of your riding, don't waste your money. Clipless has a painful learning curve which will have you falling down and cursing for a while until you get proficient with them. --snip-- Am I the only person who learned to use clipless without any falling? Some attentive practice, riding in calm places for a couple of hours, etc., etc. No, you're not the only one. "SuperSlinky" definitely overstated the learning curve on clipless. All I did was sit on my bike, with an arm holding on the porch, and practice clipping in and out a few times on each side, then rode up and down the street a couple times, stopping at each end and making sure that I could unclip smoothly, and I was good to go. Haven't fallen yet. Another option to toeclips is power grips. They're cheap and simple. It's just a heavy canvas strap that fastens diagonally across the pedal from the front outside edge to the rear inside edge. You angle your toe in to put your foot in it and when you straighten your foot it tightens down, holding your foot onto the pedal. Getting out is as simple as angling your heel outward and pulling back. A pic he http://www.nashbar.com/profile_morei...= 1269&brand= -km -- Only cowards fight kids -- unidentified Moscow protester the black rose proud to be owned by a yorkie http://community.webshots.com/user/blackrosequilts |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spinning Shoes? What are they? | HardwareLust | Techniques | 2 | July 11th 04 02:37 PM |
Newbie question on pedal s & Shoes | Coach | General | 4 | April 12th 04 01:01 PM |
shoes and pedals | Pete Biggs | UK | 10 | August 9th 03 12:36 PM |