#151
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 02.08.2018 15:52, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 10:45:56 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 01.08.2018 13:46, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:49:07 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 31.07.2018 13:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:02:26 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 30.07.2018 12:14, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:50:07 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 29.07.2018 12:01, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:59:25 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 28.07.2018 13:42, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:33:55 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 27.07.2018 14:22, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:26:22 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 26.07.2018 15:19, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:40:21 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 25.07.2018 21:44, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:33:52 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 24.07.2018 15:05, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:37:47 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 23.07.2018 23:03, JNugent wrote: On 23/07/2018 20:05, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:19:09 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 22.07.2018 18:23, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:20:43 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 21.07.2018 22:09, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 20:46:42 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 21.07.2018 21:21, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:46:19 +0100, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote: On 7/21/2018 9:33 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:23:36 +0100, Bruce 'Not Glug' Lee wrote: Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote: On 7/21/2018 6:07 AM, Bruce 'Not Glug' Lee wrote: Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 22:28:50 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 20.07.2018 21:24, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Â* Why would an adult let an anywho ride their bike? Hitler. Your answer makes no grammatical sense.Â* You can't answer a why with a pronoun. 'Hitler' isn't a pronoun.Â* It's a noun. It's a personal pronoun, you dummies. No it isn't.Â* It is a proper noun.Â* Just as all names are. Personal pronouns are 'he', 'she', 'they' etc. Â*Who gives a ****?Â* The point is the answer was nonsensical. More fool you. LOL Â*The only fool is the one who can't write in English. Bullenscheiße. Â*Changing language doesn't make your answer any more correct. I reaaly do not cares abowt sumthing cawld Grammer. That yew sae that mau grammer iz nott corect iz fore mi u complement. Espeshalli az it cumz from YEW!! Â*You sound like a drunk Glaswegian.Â* Actually, nevermind the drunk, they're like that anyway. Thanks greatly for the compliment. I can't think of any group of people who would be glad to be called Glaswegian. Â*Strike the words "...of any group of people who would be glad to be called Glaswegian". Â*There. That makes more sense now. Good one! Â*No it wasn't, it had the wit of a 6 year old. As I said, good one! In fact, excellent one! Â*Oh, you like 6 year olds. What is it to you? Â*Nothing at all, but the law doesn't like it. If it is nothing to you, why comment? Â*What's wrong with commenting on things I don't care about? Well it is not against the law --- Â*Must I do everything which is not against the law?Â* That would take a lot of time.Â* Actually maybe not, as 99% of things are against the law. So true -- Â*We are in agreement for the second time.Â* Now list the laws you would like removed: 1)Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* It is forbidden to walk your pet whale down the street. .......... 102327}Â* It is forbidden to leave your house without wearing underwear. ....... 939257)Â* No one may step on any of the nation’s currency. Â*Those laws do not exist. Â*Anyway, the first is impossible, and the other two are done without prosecution regularly. They do somewhere in the world. Â*Which country? Never mind. Â*So you were making it up then. Whatever You stated that they existed, but have no proof. Whatever. |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 02.08.2018 15:52, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 01.08.2018 14:43, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:57:41 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 31.07.2018 13:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:06:34 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 30.07.2018 12:13, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:53:56 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 29.07.2018 12:00, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:04:18 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 28.07.2018 13:41, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:40:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 27.07.2018 13:35, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Â*Treehugging ignorant moron. Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment coming from YOU. Especially as it is from YOU! Now please ejaculate in my direction the further excellent accolade of being a weed, a fungus, and the dregs of this earth. It really is a very great compliment to be called a treehugging ignorant moron by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that,Â* that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Why do people insult others? An insult can be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter. Â*No, it's because you're wrong. Once again, Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment of Treehugging ignorant moron. The fact that you call me a Treehugging ignorant moron. has nothing to do with whether I am right or wrong. You only honour me with that excellent epithet because you fear that you may be losing some argument , so you introduce an irrelevancy in order to make you think that you are omehow better than me. So I still take it as a great compliment. Â*No, I say it because all green people are incorrect. They might be, but that is independent of them being Treehugging ignorant morons So now please throw me the further excellent epithet of being a stench, a revulsion, and a big suck on a sour lemon. Â*If they are green they are by definition treehuggers. Sez you. Blah! Â*No not me, it's the meaning of the word. What word? Â*"Treehugger", do keep up at the back. Someone who hugs trees? I have never known or seen one. It's an expression, obviously too complicated for you to understand. Thanks a lot for that great compliment. Now please ejaculate to me the further honour of being a canker and an open wound. And thanks greatly for your excellent complement of my not keeping up. Now please throw out to me the further honour of being a nincompoop. No, as that word is meaningless. Oooh yes please -- And the accolade of being a mistake of nature and a heavy-metal bagpipe player? Please! If they are wrong they are by definition ignorant morons. Ignorant moron has nothing to do with being wrong. Â*If you're ignorant of something, you'll be wrong about it.Â* If you're ignorant of the earth being round, you'll think it's flat. Bullenscheiße. If I am ignorant of something I simply do not know something. By definition that omething could be anything, right or wrong. Â*If I ask Mr Smith about Quantum mechanics and he says he has no idea, I would not call him ignorant.Â* However if I ask Mr Jones and he gives me the wrong answer, some bull**** propagated by the media, then I would call him ignorant. Makes no difference. Ignorant means does not know. ********, otherwise 100% of the population is ignorant, as nobody knows everything. Exactly. Everybody is ignorant of something. So calling a person ignorant is just stating a fact. And this applies to anybody. I am really glad I am an ignorant moron according to you. Now please throw me the further excellent honour of having crawled out of a mutant maggot egg rejected by an evil scientist as being below his low standards. Â*Have you got that strange fetish where you enjoy having abuse shouted at you? Why yes! If all you can do to win your arguments is to shout compliments at me Â*I have never complimented you. Oh yes you have! By calling me a tree-hugging ignorant moron. Now please throw out to me the further excellent honour of being a thick-headed trog. Just because you misunderstand an insult as a compliment doesn't make it one. Utter ********. Just because you intend it as an insult does not make it an insult if the intended recipient does not receive it as an insult. I reserve the right to receive your outvomitings the way I see fit, not the way you do. I am my own sovereign person. it indicates to me that you are afraid you may be wrong, but are not man enough to admit it and thus try to convince yourself that you are somehow a better peron than I am. Â*No, I'm just pointing out you're wrong. Then just say it! Do not wander off into irrelevancies such as tree-hugging ignorant morons. I really take that as a compliment coming from you. Sorry for not making my replies simple enough for your small cyclist's brain. Thanks greatly for that further excellent compliment coming from YOU. Now please puke out to me the further excellent honours of being a waste of flesh, and ridiculous and obnoxious. Therefore I take such blatherings as compliments and an admission of failure by you, and an attempt (failed) to bully me into your line of thought. Hence my "Hitler" comment very early in this thread. If you think I am wrong, just say it with evidence of why I am wrong. Adding irrelevancies such as "treehugging ignorant moron" adds nothing to the conversation. All it does its show your utter intolerance of anyone who may be different from you. Â*It's clear to everyone with a brain that the green movement is a complete and utter waste of time. Thanks greatly for the further excellent compliment and honour from YOU that I have no brain. Now please ejaculate to me the further excellent compliment of being evil beyond comprehension, and half-living in the slough of despair. Please firstly explain your attraction to my ejaculations. It is your way of interacting with people. NOw I will get on my bike. Oh the clear air! And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that,Â* that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Â*No, I'm fine with normal cyclists.Â* What I don't like are the ones that dress up like they're in the Tour de France, using flashing headlamps in broad daylight, cycle on a busy road when there's a clear pavement right next to them, and wear pansy helmets because they haven't learned not to fall off yet. That is their right. Â*And it's my right to intimidate them with my larger vehicle.Â* You know those roads where the council are cheapskates and don't steamroll the road afterwards, so you can throw stones in cyclist's faces?Â* :-) It is not your right to threaten anyone with physical harm or to interfere with their right to do whatever they like. Yu do not have a right to order somone to change because his habits or mode of tranport offend you. I don't mind him cycling if he cycles in the correct place (the pavement) and wears normal clothing. If pavement equals footpath then biking on the pvement is against the law. You have the right to be offended by his clothing. The biker is not obligated to change his/her clothing because of your disgust. At least they are on a bike. Â*And take 5 times longer to get to their destination, and can't carry so much stuff. That is your take on it. What if they are enjoying themselves? You have no right to interfere with that by physical threats such as throwing up stones from large vehicles at them. Yes, you do have a right to be offended, as long as you do not act on that with physical threats. I didn't put the stones there, the council did, they should have been steamrolled.Â* They also damage car windscreens and chip paintwork allowing for rust.Â* It's a criminal activity to make roads be covered in loose chips, but the council operates above the law. Perhaps, but you still do not have the right to endanger them physically by deliberately driving fast close to them when there are loose stones about. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Everyone KEEPS having Endless Fun Beating the **** out of Poor Helpless Gay Goran Razovic! LOL
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:22:41 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-02 1:13 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:22:34 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:23:56 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 3:52 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 19:22:26 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:03:08 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 9:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:25:42 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:13:03 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 05:58:59 +0100, David wrote: its debbie's foot Who is Debbie and how many feet is her foot? 9 Doesn't that make her tread on her own toes? I wear a 10 1/2. Size is not equal to length of foot in feet. yes it is Anyone with a 10.5 foot foot would only be able to get work as a clown. my foot size is 10 1/2" in size " isn't feet. ' is feet. i foot is one foot , two feet is two feet , when you catch a fish , one foot is three feet There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore looking like an idiot. I have excitement. Is your rod erect? you've gone off topic You said you had excitement.... I saw one I did on the sidewalk at school but that was along time ago. I saw it on tv. |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Everyone KEEPS having Endless Fun Beating the **** out of PoorHelpless Gay Goran Razovic! LOL
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:17:48 +0100, David wrote:
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:22:41 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-02 1:13 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:22:34 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:23:56 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 3:52 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 19:22:26 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:03:08 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 9:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:25:42 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:13:03 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 05:58:59 +0100, David wrote: its debbie's foot Who is Debbie and how many feet is her foot? 9 Doesn't that make her tread on her own toes? I wear a 10 1/2. Size is not equal to length of foot in feet. yes it is Anyone with a 10.5 foot foot would only be able to get work as a clown. my foot size is 10 1/2" in size " isn't feet. ' is feet. i foot is one foot , two feet is two feet , when you catch a fish , one foot is three feet There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore looking like an idiot. I have excitement. Is your rod erect? you've gone off topic You said you had excitement.... I saw one I did on the sidewalk at school but that was along time ago. I saw it on tv. What kind of program films THAT?! |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:12:58 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote: On 02.08.2018 15:52, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 01.08.2018 14:43, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:57:41 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 31.07.2018 13:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:06:34 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 30.07.2018 12:13, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:53:56 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 29.07.2018 12:00, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:04:18 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 28.07.2018 13:41, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:40:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 27.07.2018 13:35, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Treehugging ignorant moron. Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment coming from YOU. Especially as it is from YOU! Now please ejaculate in my direction the further excellent accolade of being a weed, a fungus, and the dregs of this earth. It really is a very great compliment to be called a treehugging ignorant moron by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Why do people insult others? An insult can be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter. No, it's because you're wrong. Once again, Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment of Treehugging ignorant moron. The fact that you call me a Treehugging ignorant moron. has nothing to do with whether I am right or wrong. You only honour me with that excellent epithet because you fear that you may be losing some argument , so you introduce an irrelevancy in order to make you think that you are omehow better than me. So I still take it as a great compliment. No, I say it because all green people are incorrect. They might be, but that is independent of them being Treehugging ignorant morons So now please throw me the further excellent epithet of being a stench, a revulsion, and a big suck on a sour lemon. If they are green they are by definition treehuggers. Sez you. Blah! No not me, it's the meaning of the word. What word? "Treehugger", do keep up at the back. Someone who hugs trees? I have never known or seen one. It's an expression, obviously too complicated for you to understand. Thanks a lot for that great compliment. Now please ejaculate to me the further honour of being a canker and an open wound. How can you take being called thick as a compliment? And thanks greatly for your excellent complement of my not keeping up. Now please throw out to me the further honour of being a nincompoop. No, as that word is meaningless. Oooh yes please -- And the accolade of being a mistake of nature and a heavy-metal bagpipe player? Please! The only heavy metal a bagpipe should see is a crusher. If they are wrong they are by definition ignorant morons. Ignorant moron has nothing to do with being wrong. If you're ignorant of something, you'll be wrong about it. If you're ignorant of the earth being round, you'll think it's flat. Bullenscheiße. If I am ignorant of something I simply do not know something. By definition that omething could be anything, right or wrong. If I ask Mr Smith about Quantum mechanics and he says he has no idea, I would not call him ignorant. However if I ask Mr Jones and he gives me the wrong answer, some bull**** propagated by the media, then I would call him ignorant. Makes no difference. Ignorant means does not know. ********, otherwise 100% of the population is ignorant, as nobody knows everything. Exactly. Everybody is ignorant of something. So calling a person ignorant is just stating a fact. And this applies to anybody. No, not everyone is ignorant, you misunderstand the word. I am really glad I am an ignorant moron according to you. Now please throw me the further excellent honour of having crawled out of a mutant maggot egg rejected by an evil scientist as being below his low standards. Have you got that strange fetish where you enjoy having abuse shouted at you? Why yes! If all you can do to win your arguments is to shout compliments at me I have never complimented you. Oh yes you have! By calling me a tree-hugging ignorant moron. Now please throw out to me the further excellent honour of being a thick-headed trog. Just because you misunderstand an insult as a compliment doesn't make it one. Utter ********. Just because you intend it as an insult does not make it an insult if the intended recipient does not receive it as an insult. I reserve the right to receive your outvomitings the way I see fit, not the way you do. I am my own sovereign person. Head in the clouds.... Therefore I take such blatherings as compliments and an admission of failure by you, and an attempt (failed) to bully me into your line of thought. Hence my "Hitler" comment very early in this thread. If you think I am wrong, just say it with evidence of why I am wrong. Adding irrelevancies such as "treehugging ignorant moron" adds nothing to the conversation. All it does its show your utter intolerance of anyone who may be different from you. It's clear to everyone with a brain that the green movement is a complete and utter waste of time. Thanks greatly for the further excellent compliment and honour from YOU that I have no brain. Now please ejaculate to me the further excellent compliment of being evil beyond comprehension, and half-living in the slough of despair. Please firstly explain your attraction to my ejaculations. It is your way of interacting with people. I don't even know if you're sexy or not. I will not ejaculate over an ugly cyclist. NOw I will get on my bike. Oh the clear air! And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. No, I'm fine with normal cyclists. What I don't like are the ones that dress up like they're in the Tour de France, using flashing headlamps in broad daylight, cycle on a busy road when there's a clear pavement right next to them, and wear pansy helmets because they haven't learned not to fall off yet. That is their right. And it's my right to intimidate them with my larger vehicle. You know those roads where the council are cheapskates and don't steamroll the road afterwards, so you can throw stones in cyclist's faces? :-) It is not your right to threaten anyone with physical harm or to interfere with their right to do whatever they like. Yu do not have a right to order somone to change because his habits or mode of tranport offend you. I don't mind him cycling if he cycles in the correct place (the pavement) and wears normal clothing. If pavement equals footpath then biking on the pvement is against the law. Wrong. In fact in a lot of places it's signposted to be encouraged. Think about it. Busy road, quiet footpath, which do you cycle on? I have a bike and use whichever is the quietest. You have the right to be offended by his clothing. The biker is not obligated to change his/her clothing because of your disgust. It does not offend me, it just looks stupid. So I pretend they aren't there. At least they are on a bike. And take 5 times longer to get to their destination, and can't carry so much stuff. That is your take on it. What if they are enjoying themselves? You have no right to interfere with that by physical threats such as throwing up stones from large vehicles at them. Yes, you do have a right to be offended, as long as you do not act on that with physical threats. I didn't put the stones there, the council did, they should have been steamrolled. They also damage car windscreens and chip paintwork allowing for rust. It's a criminal activity to make roads be covered in loose chips, but the council operates above the law. Perhaps, but you still do not have the right to endanger them physically by deliberately driving fast close to them when there are loose stones about. They have the freedom to get off the road and use the pavement. I pay road tax and fuel duty for that road, he doesn't. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 10:56:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote: On 02.08.2018 15:52, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 10:45:56 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 01.08.2018 13:46, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:49:07 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 31.07.2018 13:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:02:26 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 30.07.2018 12:14, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:50:07 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 29.07.2018 12:01, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:59:25 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 28.07.2018 13:42, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:33:55 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 27.07.2018 14:22, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:26:22 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 26.07.2018 15:19, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:40:21 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 25.07.2018 21:44, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:33:52 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 24.07.2018 15:05, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:37:47 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 23.07.2018 23:03, JNugent wrote: On 23/07/2018 20:05, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:19:09 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 22.07.2018 18:23, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:20:43 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 21.07.2018 22:09, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 20:46:42 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 21.07.2018 21:21, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:46:19 +0100, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote: On 7/21/2018 9:33 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:23:36 +0100, Bruce 'Not Glug' Lee wrote: Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote: On 7/21/2018 6:07 AM, Bruce 'Not Glug' Lee wrote: Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 22:28:50 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 20.07.2018 21:24, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Why would an adult let an anywho ride their bike? Hitler. Your answer makes no grammatical sense. You can't answer a why with a pronoun. 'Hitler' isn't a pronoun. It's a noun. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Everyone KEEPS having Endless Fun Beating the **** out of PoorHelpless Gay Goran Razovic! LOL
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:19:10 +0100, % wrote:
On 2018-08-02 4:15 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:22:41 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-02 1:13 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:22:34 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:23:56 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 3:52 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 19:22:26 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:03:08 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 9:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:25:42 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:13:03 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 05:58:59 +0100, David wrote: its debbie's foot Who is Debbie and how many feet is her foot? 9 Doesn't that make her tread on her own toes? I wear a 10 1/2. Size is not equal to length of foot in feet. yes it is Anyone with a 10.5 foot foot would only be able to get work as a clown. my foot size is 10 1/2" in size " isn't feet. ' is feet. i foot is one foot , two feet is two feet , when you catch a fish , one foot is three feet There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore looking like an idiot. I have excitement. Is your rod erect? you've gone off topic You said you had excitement.... i never said that , i don't capitalize and i don't use periods That's because you're thick. |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Everyone KEEPS having Endless Fun Beating the **** out of Poor Helpless Gay Goran Razovic! LOL
"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:17:48 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:22:41 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-02 1:13 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:22:34 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:23:56 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 3:52 PM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 19:22:26 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 17:03:08 +0100, % wrote: On 2018-08-01 9:00 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:25:42 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:13:03 +0100, David wrote: "Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message news On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 05:58:59 +0100, David wrote: its debbie's foot Who is Debbie and how many feet is her foot? 9 Doesn't that make her tread on her own toes? I wear a 10 1/2. Size is not equal to length of foot in feet. yes it is Anyone with a 10.5 foot foot would only be able to get work as a clown. my foot size is 10 1/2" in size " isn't feet. ' is feet. i foot is one foot , two feet is two feet , when you catch a fish , one foot is three feet There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore looking like an idiot. I have excitement. Is your rod erect? you've gone off topic You said you had excitement.... I saw one I did on the sidewalk at school but that was along time ago. I saw it on tv. What kind of program films THAT?! adobe premier |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 03.08.2018 21:03, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 10:56:31 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 02.08.2018 15:52, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 10:45:56 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 01.08.2018 13:46, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:49:07 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 31.07.2018 13:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:02:26 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 30.07.2018 12:14, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:50:07 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 29.07.2018 12:01, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 09:59:25 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 28.07.2018 13:42, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:33:55 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 27.07.2018 14:22, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:26:22 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 26.07.2018 15:19, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:40:21 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 25.07.2018 21:44, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:33:52 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 24.07.2018 15:05, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:37:47 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 23.07.2018 23:03, JNugent wrote: On 23/07/2018 20:05, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:19:09 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 22.07.2018 18:23, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:20:43 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 21.07.2018 22:09, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 20:46:42 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 21.07.2018 21:21, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 18:46:19 +0100, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote: On 7/21/2018 9:33 AM, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:23:36 +0100, Bruce 'Not Glug' Lee wrote: Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote: On 7/21/2018 6:07 AM, Bruce 'Not Glug' Lee wrote: Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 22:28:50 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 20.07.2018 21:24, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Â* Why would an adult let an anywho ride their bike? Hitler. Your answer makes no grammatical sense.Â* You can't answer a why with a pronoun. 'Hitler' isn't a pronoun.Â* It's a noun. It's a personal pronoun, you dummies. No it isn't.Â* It is a proper noun. Just as all names are. Personal pronouns are 'he', 'she', 'they' etc. Â*Who gives a ****?Â* The point is the answer was nonsensical. More fool you. LOL Â*The only fool is the one who can't write in English. Bullenscheiße. Â*Changing language doesn't make your answer any more correct. I reaaly do not cares abowt sumthing cawld Grammer. That yew sae that mau grammer iz nott corect iz fore mi u complement. Espeshalli az it cumz from YEW!! Â*You sound like a drunk Glaswegian.Â* Actually, nevermind the drunk, they're like that anyway. Thanks greatly for the compliment. I can't think of any group of people who would be glad to be called Glaswegian. Â*Strike the words "...of any group of people who would be glad to be called Glaswegian". Â*There. That makes more sense now. Good one! Â*No it wasn't, it had the wit of a 6 year old. As I said, good one! In fact, excellent one! Â*Oh, you like 6 year olds. What is it to you? Â*Nothing at all, but the law doesn't like it. If it is nothing to you, why comment? Â*What's wrong with commenting on things I don't care about? Well it is not against the law --- Â*Must I do everything which is not against the law?Â* That would take a lot of time.Â* Actually maybe not, as 99% of things are against the law. So true -- Â*We are in agreement for the second time.Â* Now list the laws you would like removed: 1)Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* It is forbidden to walk your pet whale down the street. .......... 102327}Â* It is forbidden to leave your house without wearing underwear. ....... 939257)Â* No one may step on any of the nation’s currency. Â*Those laws do not exist. Â*Anyway, the first is impossible, and the other two are done without prosecution regularly. They do somewhere in the world. Â*Which country? Never mind. Â*So you were making it up then. Whatever Â*You stated that they existed, but have no proof. Whatever. Admittance of defeat noted. Whatever |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Stolen Bike
On 03.08.2018 21:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:12:58 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 02.08.2018 15:52, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 01.08.2018 14:43, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:57:41 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 31.07.2018 13:02, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:06:34 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 30.07.2018 12:13, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:53:56 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 29.07.2018 12:00, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:04:18 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 28.07.2018 13:41, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:40:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On 27.07.2018 13:35, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote: Â*Treehugging ignorant moron. Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment coming from YOU. Especially as it is from YOU! Now please ejaculate in my direction the further excellent accolade of being a weed, a fungus, and the dregs of this earth. It really is a very great compliment to be called a treehugging ignorant moron by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that,Â* that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Why do people insult others? An insult can be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter. Â*No, it's because you're wrong. Once again, Thanks greatly for that excellent compliment of Treehugging ignorant moron. The fact that you call me a Treehugging ignorant moron. has nothing to do with whether I am right or wrong. You only honour me with that excellent epithet because you fear that you may be losing some argument , so you introduce an irrelevancy in order to make you think that you are omehow better than me. So I still take it as a great compliment. Â*No, I say it because all green people are incorrect. They might be, but that is independent of them being Treehugging ignorant morons So now please throw me the further excellent epithet of being a stench, a revulsion, and a big suck on a sour lemon. Â*If they are green they are by definition treehuggers. Sez you. Blah! Â*No not me, it's the meaning of the word. What word? Â*"Treehugger", do keep up at the back. Someone who hugs trees? I have never known or seen one. Â*It's an expression, obviously too complicated for you to understand. Thanks a lot for that great compliment. Now please ejaculate to me the further honour of being a canker and an open wound. How can you take being called thick as a compliment? Easy. It is because you said it. Obviously you have nothing constructive to say. And thanks greatly for your excellent complement of my not keeping up. Now please throw out to me the further honour of being a nincompoop. Â*No, as that word is meaningless. Oooh yes please -- And the accolade of being a mistake of nature and a heavy-metal bagpipe player? Please! The only heavy metal a bagpipe should see is a crusher. If they are wrong they are by definition ignorant morons. Ignorant moron has nothing to do with being wrong. Â*If you're ignorant of something, you'll be wrong about it.Â* If you're ignorant of the earth being round, you'll think it's flat. Bullenscheiße. If I am ignorant of something I simply do not know something. By definition that omething could be anything, right or wrong. Â*If I ask Mr Smith about Quantum mechanics and he says he has no idea, I would not call him ignorant.Â* However if I ask Mr Jones and he gives me the wrong answer, some bull**** propagated by the media, then I would call him ignorant. Makes no difference. Ignorant means does not know. Â*********, otherwise 100% of the population is ignorant, as nobody knows everything. Exactly. Everybody is ignorant of something. So calling a person ignorant is just stating a fact. And this applies to anybody. No, not everyone is ignorant, you misunderstand the word. Oh yes they are. I do not misunderstand the word. I am really glad I am an ignorant moron according to you. Now please throw me the further excellent honour of having crawled out of a mutant maggot egg rejected by an evil scientist as being below his low standards. Â*Have you got that strange fetish where you enjoy having abuse shouted at you? Why yes! If all you can do to win your arguments is to shout compliments at me Â*I have never complimented you. Oh yes you have! By calling me a tree-hugging ignorant moron. Now please throw out to me the further excellent honour of being a thick-headed trog. Â*Just because you misunderstand an insult as a compliment doesn't make it one. Utter ********. Just because you intend it as an insult does not make it an insult if the intended recipient does not receive it as an insult. I reserve the right to receive your outvomitings the way I see fit, not the way you do. I am my own sovereign person. Head in the clouds.... Eh?? Evidence of defeat noted .... Therefore I take such blatherings as compliments and an admission of failure by you, and an attempt (failed) to bully me into your line of thought. Hence my "Hitler" comment very early in this thread. If you think I am wrong, just say it with evidence of why I am wrong. Adding irrelevancies such as "treehugging ignorant moron" adds nothing to the conversation. All it does its show your utter intolerance of anyone who may be different from you. Â*It's clear to everyone with a brain that the green movement is a complete and utter waste of time. Thanks greatly for the further excellent compliment and honour from YOU that I have no brain. Now please ejaculate to me the further excellent compliment of being evil beyond comprehension, and half-living in the slough of despair. Â*Please firstly explain your attraction to my ejaculations. It is your way of interacting with people. I don't even know if you're sexy or not.Â* I will not ejaculate over an ugly cyclist. Well that is a relief. NOw I will get on my bike. Oh the clear air! And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that,Â* that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Â*No, I'm fine with normal cyclists.Â* What I don't like are the ones that dress up like they're in the Tour de France, using flashing headlamps in broad daylight, cycle on a busy road when there's a clear pavement right next to them, and wear pansy helmets because they haven't learned not to fall off yet. That is their right. Â*And it's my right to intimidate them with my larger vehicle.Â* You know those roads where the council are cheapskates and don't steamroll the road afterwards, so you can throw stones in cyclist's faces?Â* :-) It is not your right to threaten anyone with physical harm or to interfere with their right to do whatever they like. Yu do not have a right to order somone to change because his habits or mode of tranport offend you. Â*I don't mind him cycling if he cycles in the correct place (the pavement) and wears normal clothing. If pavement equals footpath then biking on the pvement is against the law. Wrong.Â* In fact in a lot of places it's signposted to be encouraged. Where signposted it is OK. When not signposted, it is technically against the law, though in practice usually not enforced (pragmatism ...) Think about it.Â* Busy road, quiet footpath, which do you cycle on?Â* I have a bike and use whichever is the quietest. I usually find the road safer than the footpath. At least on the road you don't usually meet cars backing out appearing from nowhere, pedestrians wandering around like Brown's cows, .... You have the right to be offended by his clothing. The biker is not obligated to change his/her clothing because of your disgust. It does not offend me, it just looks stupid.Â* So I pretend they aren't there. That is fine. You have the right to ignore things which you think are stupid. At least they are on a bike. Â*And take 5 times longer to get to their destination, and can't carry so much stuff. That is your take on it. What if they are enjoying themselves? You have no right to interfere with that by physical threats such as throwing up stones from large vehicles at them. Yes, you do have a right to be offended, as long as you do not act on that with physical threats. Â*I didn't put the stones there, the council did, they should have been steamrolled.Â* They also damage car windscreens and chip paintwork allowing for rust.Â* It's a criminal activity to make roads be covered in loose chips, but the council operates above the law. Perhaps, but you still do not have the right to endanger them physically by deliberately driving fast close to them when there are loose stones about. They have the freedom to get off the road and use the pavement.Â* I pay road tax and fuel duty for that road, he doesn't. He probably does. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stolen bike.... anyone want to bet on it? | Anton Berlin | Racing | 0 | December 22nd 09 07:30 PM |
Shelly Olds...bike stolen, bike found, gold medal won | caffetrieste | Racing | 20 | October 14th 08 09:39 AM |
Stolen bike | Chris A | UK | 26 | March 27th 07 03:01 PM |
nearly stolen bike | Simon Brooke | UK | 0 | November 18th 05 10:16 PM |
nearly stolen bike | nobody760 | UK | 6 | November 17th 05 08:05 AM |