Ads |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 12:24:41 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 8:10:04 PM UTC+2, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 9/26/2017 8:11 AM, wrote: Of course Jay knows what he is talking about. The people saying that they can skid their wheels with whatever brakes they use don't get it. I don't want my wheels to skid, I want to slow down in a controlled and predictable manner in all circumstances. In dry conditions, flat terrain and no CF rims any brake system will do. Have you had problems in dry conditions in hilly terrain? So far I haven't. -- - Frank Krygowski Huh, where did I said that? Fyi, all my road bikes have rimbrakes. Always had. Only my FS mountainbike and my cross bike have hydraulic disk brakes.. So I know the advantages and disadvantages of both. Do you, by own experience or only from heresay? Lou, that's my suspicion. I know what hydraulic disks are like on full suspension bikes and that's fine but they are way more than necessary on cross bikes. Right now I have two cross bikes - a Ridley with TRP 9.0 V-brakes and my Redline with hydraulic disks. I do not like the disks on the light bikes and I haven't come across any conditions that the disk would have any advantages including coming down hills through streams pouring across the trail. And the V-brake is more predictable. As I said before, on hard descents you have to hold on and that means that you can easily apply a disk too hard. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 10:34:05 PM UTC+2, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 9/26/2017 3:24 PM, wrote: On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 8:10:04 PM UTC+2, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 9/26/2017 8:11 AM, wrote: Of course Jay knows what he is talking about. The people saying that they can skid their wheels with whatever brakes they use don't get it. I don't want my wheels to skid, I want to slow down in a controlled and predictable manner in all circumstances. In dry conditions, flat terrain and no CF rims any brake system will do. Have you had problems in dry conditions in hilly terrain? So far I haven't. -- - Frank Krygowski Huh, where did I said that? I was asking a question, Lou. OK, strange question but my answer is no I haven’t. Fyi, all my road bikes have rimbrakes. Always had. Only my FS mountainbike and my cross bike have hydraulic disk brakes. So I know the advantages and disadvantages of both. Do you, by own experience or only from heresay? As I've explained, I don't own a bike with disc brakes, but I've ridden several. Admittedly, not on long rides (maximum just half an hour) but those rides gave me my own experience. I've also talked to disc brake users who have had problems, like the bike tourist we hosted who once lost his braking rather suddenly on a hilly tour when his pads wore away without warning. And I've ridden at least 30 miles with a friend whose rear disc turned out to be responsible for the hard-to-diagnose noises he got when pushing hard. That is not experience. You have to use them in wet condintions on a curvy and steep descents, then you experience the benifits. I agree with you that I don't want my wheels to skid. But my experience is that in dry conditions even in hilly terrain, any rim brake of reasonable quality will do. I'd get discs for my commuter if I commuted as Jay does. But I've never been quite as dedicated as Jay; I'd drive the car if it was raining when it was time to head to work, or if the temperature was below freezing. And now I'm retired. I can choose my riding weather. In that case you don’t need disk brakes. Lou -- - Frank Krygowski |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 10:34:59 PM UTC+2, wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 12:24:41 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 8:10:04 PM UTC+2, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 9/26/2017 8:11 AM, wrote: Of course Jay knows what he is talking about. The people saying that they can skid their wheels with whatever brakes they use don't get it. I don't want my wheels to skid, I want to slow down in a controlled and predictable manner in all circumstances. In dry conditions, flat terrain and no CF rims any brake system will do. Have you had problems in dry conditions in hilly terrain? So far I haven't. -- - Frank Krygowski Huh, where did I said that? Fyi, all my road bikes have rimbrakes. Always had. Only my FS mountainbike and my cross bike have hydraulic disk brakes. So I know the advantages and disadvantages of both. Do you, by own experience or only from heresay? Lou, that's my suspicion. I know what hydraulic disks are like on full suspension bikes and that's fine but they are way more than necessary on cross bikes. Right now I have two cross bikes - a Ridley with TRP 9.0 V-brakes and my Redline with hydraulic disks. I do not like the disks on the light bikes and I haven't come across any conditions that the disk would have any advantages including coming down hills through streams pouring across the trail. And the V-brake is more predictable. As I said before, on hard descents you have to hold on and that means that you can easily apply a disk too hard. We disagree on that Tom. In the conditon I ride my crossbike, I don’t want rim brakes. This doesn’t mean that I need disk brakes but since I can choose I choose hydraulic disbrakes. Mechanical diskbrakes are a joke btw. Lou |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT), jbeattie
wrote: On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 2:56:47 AM UTC-7, Duane wrote: John B. wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:48:53 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, September 25, 2017 at 11:35:45 AM UTC-4, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, September 25, 2017 at 7:55:26 AM UTC-7, Frank Krygowski wrote: Snipped I have tried some, which is why I'm concerned! Granted, I haven't done long rides on any. My tests were on bikes belonging to friends, one bike I was fixing for a bike tourist we were hosting, bikes I tested briefly while helping a good friend shop for a new bike, and a mountain bike owned by an acquaintance who let me ride it for maybe half an hour in our local forest preserve. The latter was the most upscale bike of the lot. When he traded bikes with me, he cautioned me "Don't forget, you never need more than one finger on the brakes." He was right, of course. And I'd be unlikely to forget on that bike because it had undersized brake levers, plus it was way different than any of my bikes. But on a road bike with normal sized levers, I'd worry about forgetting. I once saw a woman go over the bars because she wasn't familiar with the reduced lever force of Shimano dual pivots, back when those were new technology. It seems to me that stopping a bike hard should require a bit of a hard squeeze on the levers. At least, until bicycles come with something vaguely akin to the anti-lock brakes on cars. (Anti-pitchover brakes?) I don't think front discs are a problem for most normal people coming from a dual pivot or other efficient brake. Rear hydraulic discs do require some adjustment because they are far more powerful than any cable operated brake, being that there aren't the usual losses from cable or housing. I was skidding my rear on the Roubaix, but that hasn't been an issue on the Norco for some reason. Maybe I'm acclimated -- or maybe the Roubaix had too much system pressure. The rear cable disc is no better than a rim brake in dry weather. A rear dual pivot is actually stronger, but I hope to remedy that problem with a new rear brake. The first generation Avid BB7s (mine are 13 years old) had crappy return springs that can't manage all the cable drag, and the caliper will rub after braking if the pads are set close to the disc. -- Jay Beattie. I can easily apply my front Dura Ace AX brake to a force where the rear wheel lifts a lot and I have to release the front brake lever to avoid going over the bar. On my MTB with the roller cam rear brake under the chainstays, I can easily lock up the rear wheel in ant weather = dry or wet. Cheers Given that the braking force of a wheeled vehicle is a factor of the coefficient of friction between the tires and the road I am at a bit of a loss as to why a disk brake is so much superior to a rim brake as with vee brakes I can easily skid either the front wheel (very carefully :-) or the rear wheel, or both wheels together on ordinary black asphalt pavement, either dry or wet, using two fingers on the brake lever. Will disk brakes somehow magically improve this. -- Cheers, John B. I don’t think the question is stopping on wet pavement. I think the question is stopping with wet rims and pads. I don’t use disc brakes and generally don’t need them but I’ve recently been caught in a heavy downpour where my brakes didn’t stop well. Jay commutes in a hilly, rainy area and says disc brakes work when wet. I expect he knows what he’s talking about. I certainly know what I like. A good dual pivot will stop you in the rain, although you may get a little free-fall before braking starts. My issue was the brake-lathe effect in wet weather. One of my work cohorts commutes year round, mostly flat and farther than I do on a daily basis. He was replacing his front rim every year to two years. He finally got tired of paying for rim swaps and bought an on-sale Fuji with cable discs. "Because I like 'em" is a perfectly valid argument which I agree with whole heartedly and I was posting largely to refute that "I got a disc and it is better" argument, which certainly didn't appear to be your contention. "Braking is also more rapid and positive with a well adjusted disc." I would really like to see the dynamics of that statement explained as during the 20 years or so that I worked on aircraft it was always explained to us that maximum braking force is generated just before the tire starts to skid which I have always assumed applied to any rubber tired wheel and thus any brake that could actual stop the wheel from turning must be capable of generating maximum braking force. A poorly adjusted cable disc is worse than a dual pivot, which is an argument for hydraulic discs on wet weather bikes. I really like the way the hydraulic discs modulate on the Norco. The rear brake was too powerful on the stolen Roubaix, and I had to get used to that -- although it did seem to relax over time, maybe due to pad wear-in. Anyway, there are pros and cons, but I wouldn't build a year-round wet weather commuter or CX/gravel bike with rim brakes. On a road race bike, I would (and did) go with rim brakes, although hydraulic discs are still a reasonable choice and a good choice on a bike with CF rims that will be raced in spring classics. My nice bike will only get wet because I didn't plan well -- and poor braking will be my penance. -- Jay Beattie. -- Cheers, John B. |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 5:34:08 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT), jbeattie wrote: On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 2:56:47 AM UTC-7, Duane wrote: John B. wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:48:53 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, September 25, 2017 at 11:35:45 AM UTC-4, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, September 25, 2017 at 7:55:26 AM UTC-7, Frank Krygowski wrote: Snipped I have tried some, which is why I'm concerned! Granted, I haven't done long rides on any. My tests were on bikes belonging to friends, one bike I was fixing for a bike tourist we were hosting, bikes I tested briefly while helping a good friend shop for a new bike, and a mountain bike owned by an acquaintance who let me ride it for maybe half an hour in our local forest preserve. The latter was the most upscale bike of the lot. When he traded bikes with me, he cautioned me "Don't forget, you never need more than one finger on the brakes." He was right, of course. And I'd be unlikely to forget on that bike because it had undersized brake levers, plus it was way different than any of my bikes. But on a road bike with normal sized levers, I'd worry about forgetting. I once saw a woman go over the bars because she wasn't familiar with the reduced lever force of Shimano dual pivots, back when those were new technology. It seems to me that stopping a bike hard should require a bit of a hard squeeze on the levers. At least, until bicycles come with something vaguely akin to the anti-lock brakes on cars. (Anti-pitchover brakes?) I don't think front discs are a problem for most normal people coming from a dual pivot or other efficient brake. Rear hydraulic discs do require some adjustment because they are far more powerful than any cable operated brake, being that there aren't the usual losses from cable or housing. I was skidding my rear on the Roubaix, but that hasn't been an issue on the Norco for some reason. Maybe I'm acclimated -- or maybe the Roubaix had too much system pressure. The rear cable disc is no better than a rim brake in dry weather. A rear dual pivot is actually stronger, but I hope to remedy that problem with a new rear brake. The first generation Avid BB7s (mine are 13 years old) had crappy return springs that can't manage all the cable drag, and the caliper will rub after braking if the pads are set close to the disc. -- Jay Beattie. I can easily apply my front Dura Ace AX brake to a force where the rear wheel lifts a lot and I have to release the front brake lever to avoid going over the bar. On my MTB with the roller cam rear brake under the chainstays, I can easily lock up the rear wheel in ant weather = dry or wet. Cheers Given that the braking force of a wheeled vehicle is a factor of the coefficient of friction between the tires and the road I am at a bit of a loss as to why a disk brake is so much superior to a rim brake as with vee brakes I can easily skid either the front wheel (very carefully :-) or the rear wheel, or both wheels together on ordinary black asphalt pavement, either dry or wet, using two fingers on the brake lever. Will disk brakes somehow magically improve this. -- Cheers, John B. I don’t think the question is stopping on wet pavement. I think the question is stopping with wet rims and pads. I don’t use disc brakes and generally don’t need them but I’ve recently been caught in a heavy downpour where my brakes didn’t stop well. Jay commutes in a hilly, rainy area and says disc brakes work when wet.. I expect he knows what he’s talking about. I certainly know what I like. A good dual pivot will stop you in the rain, although you may get a little free-fall before braking starts. My issue was the brake-lathe effect in wet weather. One of my work cohorts commutes year round, mostly flat and farther than I do on a daily basis. He was replacing his front rim every year to two years. He finally got tired of paying for rim swaps and bought an on-sale Fuji with cable discs. "Because I like 'em" is a perfectly valid argument which I agree with whole heartedly and I was posting largely to refute that "I got a disc and it is better" argument, which certainly didn't appear to be your contention. "Braking is also more rapid and positive with a well adjusted disc." I would really like to see the dynamics of that statement explained as during the 20 years or so that I worked on aircraft it was always explained to us that maximum braking force is generated just before the tire starts to skid which I have always assumed applied to any rubber tired wheel and thus any brake that could actual stop the wheel from turning must be capable of generating maximum braking force. Oh, stop putting up straw men and then bickering with what nobody said. It is perfectly clear that those with whom you are pretending to argue are in fact discussing either a)the behavior of various brakes up to the point of locking the wheel, or b)the situation wherein [wet] conditions are preventing the brakes from being able to lock the wheel at all. Also - a vehicle with no brakes still has tires with a coefficient of traction, but no braking ability at all, so your definition of braking ability is not correct. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:09:45 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote: On 9/26/2017 4:38 AM, James wrote: On 26/09/17 13:06, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 9/25/2017 6:00 PM, jbeattie wrote: *People are willing to accept the weight and aerodynamic penalty with discs, apparently on the belief that ordinary rim brakes are inadequate or because they want to use CF wheels. Who knows. Many people are willing to accept anything that's in fashion in their own little world. Fashion is amazingly powerful, and doesn't need to make any particular sense. At least we can claim that disc brakes are marginally more useful than tattoos. If a person wants to use wheels with CFRP rims, a bike with disc brakes makes sense. CFRP rims with rim brakes usually work ok in dry conditions provided the correct brake blocks are used.* Some CFRP rims can be damaged if the wrong pads are used, and some have been damaged even with the "correct" pads. But in wet conditions, the braking performance is generally very much worse. Disc brakes solve those problems, and allow rim manufacturers to save more grams because there's no need for a braking surface. I'm not saying there are never benefits to disc brakes, and I don't think anyone else is saying that. I would never tell Jay he shouldn't use discs; his commuting regimen in hilly, rainy Portland is perfect for them. So yes, discs have some advantages. They also have some disadvantages, and those disadvantages become known only through discussions something like this one. Advertisers are certainly not going to spend much time listing the disadvantages. And the typical consumer isn't going to think about these things at all, beyond "Oooh, disc brakes. They use them on motorcycles, so that's what I need! I'll never buy a bike without them things!" We're supposed to be better than that. We should consider both advantages and disadvantages. It happens to be my judgment that for almost all road cyclists, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Almost everyone would be better off with more normal brakes. I find the argument somewhat humorous as even today trucks hauling 50 ton, or more, loads are still using drum brakes, not disc brakes, and when I worked at the copper mine in Irian Jaya, which was a 30 mile downhill run from the tram site to the main camp, some of the trucks used water cooled drum brakes, which I had also seen in the mountains of California where one log might be a full load for a logging truck. Good Lord, back in the days of coaster brakes kids rode with no brakes at all, Just stick the toe of your "tennis shoe" between the tire and the fork which even worked in wet weather. Now I'm told that nothing but a disc will function in the wet. "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore." -- Cheers, John B. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On 9/26/2017 8:34 PM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT), jbeattie wrote: "Braking is also more rapid and positive with a well adjusted disc." I would really like to see the dynamics of that statement explained as during the 20 years or so that I worked on aircraft it was always explained to us that maximum braking force is generated just before the tire starts to skid which I have always assumed applied to any rubber tired wheel and thus any brake that could actual stop the wheel from turning must be capable of generating maximum braking force. I've thought a bit about the descriptions of brake behavior. What you say about maximum deceleration occurring very near skidding is certainly correct. But what about statements like Jay's "rapid and positive," or others' descriptions of "progressive" or "controllable" and the like? On one hand, I don't think they're necessarily just ad-speak. I think ideally, you'd want the braking force on the wheel to be perfectly proportional to the force applied to the levers. There are various practical effects that could destroy that proportionality. Cable friction is certainly one such phenomenon, if it's got any stick-slip component to it. (My antique motorcycle suffered from that until I replaced its front brake cable.) Pivot friction in both the lever and the brake's pivots could do the same. Some brakes have return springs that tend to slide a bit where they contact the brake arm as the arms move, and that causes a little jerk in the movement. Some brakes (e.g. the notorious Campy Deltas) had geometry that was inherently non-linear. And I can see that hydraulic discs inherently remove several of those possibilities. And I certainly won't say that a person who rides a lot could never detect those effects. I know that musicians can detect and be bothered by incredibly tiny imperfections in an instrument's action. On the other hand, exactly when does that non-linearity matter? I think unless a person is frequently diving into corners, trying to brake at the last second and maintain the maximum possible speed through the corner, the difference can't possibly be very important. So: Top level road racers? Yeah, I can see them wanting the very best, and detecting a positive difference between a hydraulic disc vs. a top shelf caliper brake. I suppose some may gain a very slight advantage in a fast, curvy descent with a better brake. But I doubt it's ever made a difference in who actually won a race. And except for Jay-style commuters (doing hills during six months of wet weather) I doubt the differences make a practical difference to many non-racers. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:57:03 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote: On 9/26/2017 8:34 PM, John B. wrote: On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT), jbeattie wrote: "Braking is also more rapid and positive with a well adjusted disc." I would really like to see the dynamics of that statement explained as during the 20 years or so that I worked on aircraft it was always explained to us that maximum braking force is generated just before the tire starts to skid which I have always assumed applied to any rubber tired wheel and thus any brake that could actual stop the wheel from turning must be capable of generating maximum braking force. I've thought a bit about the descriptions of brake behavior. What you say about maximum deceleration occurring very near skidding is certainly correct. But what about statements like Jay's "rapid and positive," or others' descriptions of "progressive" or "controllable" and the like? On one hand, I don't think they're necessarily just ad-speak. I think ideally, you'd want the braking force on the wheel to be perfectly proportional to the force applied to the levers. There are various practical effects that could destroy that proportionality. Cable friction is certainly one such phenomenon, if it's got any stick-slip component to it. (My antique motorcycle suffered from that until I replaced its front brake cable.) Pivot friction in both the lever and the brake's pivots could do the same. Some brakes have return springs that tend to slide a bit where they contact the brake arm as the arms move, and that causes a little jerk in the movement. Some brakes (e.g. the notorious Campy Deltas) had geometry that was inherently non-linear. And I can see that hydraulic discs inherently remove several of those possibilities. And I certainly won't say that a person who rides a lot could never detect those effects. I know that musicians can detect and be bothered by incredibly tiny imperfections in an instrument's action. On the other hand, exactly when does that non-linearity matter? I think unless a person is frequently diving into corners, trying to brake at the last second and maintain the maximum possible speed through the corner, the difference can't possibly be very important. I wonder. Basically I have three different braking systems on four different bikes. In Bangkok both bikes have conventional dual pivot brakes and in Phuket the utility bike has vee brakes and the road bike has center pull brakes (at the moment). Switching from one bike to another does, momentarily, result in a difference in "brake feel", for want of a better description, but after the first corner I don't notice any difference. The Bangkok bikes are much the same and ridden on essentially the same roads but the Phuket bikes are very different as the utility bike's vee brakes are surprisingly effective, I can skid either or both wheels on dry asphalt roads, while the center pull brakes are less powerful. But still, I might notice the difference the first time I apply the brakes but other than that I don't remember every thinking "Oh yes, this is the yellow bike the brakes are different", in fact generally speaking I don't think much about braking at all. I would comment that I do spend time "tuning" the brakes on all the bikes to ensure that there is minimal cable drag, the pads are aligned and then the brakes apply equal pressure to each side of the rim, but that shouldn't be unusual (I hope) :-) -- Cheers, John B. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Road Discs
On 9/26/2017 11:32 PM, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:57:03 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 9/26/2017 8:34 PM, John B. wrote: On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:18:28 -0700 (PDT), jbeattie wrote: "Braking is also more rapid and positive with a well adjusted disc." I would really like to see the dynamics of that statement explained as during the 20 years or so that I worked on aircraft it was always explained to us that maximum braking force is generated just before the tire starts to skid which I have always assumed applied to any rubber tired wheel and thus any brake that could actual stop the wheel from turning must be capable of generating maximum braking force. I've thought a bit about the descriptions of brake behavior. What you say about maximum deceleration occurring very near skidding is certainly correct. But what about statements like Jay's "rapid and positive," or others' descriptions of "progressive" or "controllable" and the like? On one hand, I don't think they're necessarily just ad-speak. I think ideally, you'd want the braking force on the wheel to be perfectly proportional to the force applied to the levers. There are various practical effects that could destroy that proportionality. Cable friction is certainly one such phenomenon, if it's got any stick-slip component to it. (My antique motorcycle suffered from that until I replaced its front brake cable.) Pivot friction in both the lever and the brake's pivots could do the same. Some brakes have return springs that tend to slide a bit where they contact the brake arm as the arms move, and that causes a little jerk in the movement. Some brakes (e.g. the notorious Campy Deltas) had geometry that was inherently non-linear. And I can see that hydraulic discs inherently remove several of those possibilities. And I certainly won't say that a person who rides a lot could never detect those effects. I know that musicians can detect and be bothered by incredibly tiny imperfections in an instrument's action. On the other hand, exactly when does that non-linearity matter? I think unless a person is frequently diving into corners, trying to brake at the last second and maintain the maximum possible speed through the corner, the difference can't possibly be very important. I wonder. Basically I have three different braking systems on four different bikes. In Bangkok both bikes have conventional dual pivot brakes and in Phuket the utility bike has vee brakes and the road bike has center pull brakes (at the moment). Switching from one bike to another does, momentarily, result in a difference in "brake feel", for want of a better description, but after the first corner I don't notice any difference. The Bangkok bikes are much the same and ridden on essentially the same roads but the Phuket bikes are very different as the utility bike's vee brakes are surprisingly effective, I can skid either or both wheels on dry asphalt roads, while the center pull brakes are less powerful. But still, I might notice the difference the first time I apply the brakes but other than that I don't remember every thinking "Oh yes, this is the yellow bike the brakes are different", in fact generally speaking I don't think much about braking at all. I would comment that I do spend time "tuning" the brakes on all the bikes to ensure that there is minimal cable drag, the pads are aligned and then the brakes apply equal pressure to each side of the rim, but that shouldn't be unusual (I hope) :-) I think this is the main reason I don't think much about the different brake types I use: I almost never have to brake hard at all. In fact, it's sort of an objective to use the brakes the least amount possible. I mean, almost by definition, using the brakes slows you down, right? -- - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discs on the road. The Insider has his say | Simon Mason | UK | 0 | January 10th 12 04:46 PM |
Road bike with discs and fender mounts? | Gooserider | General | 7 | February 2nd 07 11:54 PM |
discs vs V brakes | ODB | Australia | 31 | October 23rd 06 08:37 AM |
Discs shrieking. why? | Ben | Mountain Biking | 6 | November 30th 04 11:01 PM |
new to discs - squeeky when wet ! | Steve Walton | UK | 6 | November 21st 04 01:46 PM |