#1
|
|||
|
|||
"women's" mtbs
What is the deal with those bikes you see -- mostly MTBs -- that have a
top rail that's neither parallel to the ground (thus, strong) nor low enough to actually step through? The only explanation I can think of is that non-bike people have some Victorian-era cultural baggage that tells them the top rail must drop down a bit if they're a woman Just Because. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"women's" mtbs
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:55:14 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
What is the deal with those bikes you see -- mostly MTBs -- that have a top rail that's neither parallel to the ground (thus, strong) nor low enough to actually step through? A) Because they are supposedly ridden/stunted over rough ground, it provides an extra gap for dismounting or lowering you seat. B) In this day an age of patent trolling, it allowed them to avoid a patent troll? C) As suggested, unisex? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Men's" vs. "Women's" bicycles | Ignoramus4707 | Techniques | 33 | June 7th 07 04:59 AM |
"John "Cho" Gilmer keeps publishing his "Manifesto" over and over." | Hoodini | Racing | 0 | April 23rd 07 12:38 AM |
Mike Vandeman says "Okay" to MTBs in Los Padres NF! | tom | Mountain Biking | 3 | February 4th 07 12:34 AM |
R.I.P. Jim Price (aka. "biker_billy", "sydney", "Boudreaux") | spin156 | Techniques | 15 | November 28th 05 07:21 PM |