#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
interesting reading, take a look at the email trail.
http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:49:58 -0700 (PDT), Scott
wrote: interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. These emails are quite confusing http://www.livestrong.com/teamradios...g-allegations/ What I don't understand is that they think that revealing that Landis was "blackmailing them" (can't really see any trace of that in the emails, but let's assume he was) is going to help them avoid discussing the facts at hand ? Something Landis has apparently been doing with USADA (and obtaining immunity in the process?) ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On 05/21/2010 11:49 AM, Scott wrote:
interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. I'm waiting for the Landis spin on this. It reads like a blackmail attempt. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On May 21, 2:49*pm, Scott wrote:
interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. dumbass, blackmailing someone only works if you have real dirt on them. if landis is telling the truth, there is nothing illegal about it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On May 21, 1:20*pm, Amit Ghosh wrote:
On May 21, 2:49*pm, Scott wrote: interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. dumbass, blackmailing someone only works if you have real dirt on them. if landis is telling the truth, there is nothing illegal about it. two very valid points, but nothing that we didn't already know. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On May 22, 6:49*am, Scott wrote:
interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. Thanks for that. It gives a rich new vein of memes for RBR: 1) It's great to see Floyd back in top form. 2) It's great to see Floyd smiling. 3) It's great to see Floyd and OUCH together again and back on top. 4) He's been through hell, give him a break. 5) Whether you believe him or not, you can't argue with the fact that he has been punished a thousand times over. 6) I don't think he did it. 7) He didn't do it. 8) The french lab is a piece of s--t. 9) Let's move on. 10) Who cares about the past. 11) He overhauled the entire anti-doping system. 12) Check out his website and see what they did to him. (please do this yourself if you haven't already) 13) He's working with the kids in South Central Los Angeles. 14) It's amazing to see him get through everything he has been through and get back on top with an artificial hip! 15) Check out floydlandis.com for more info. 16) 2006 Tour of California Champion Floyd Landis. Read mo http://www.livestrong.com/teamradios...#ixzz0ob7QaaUE |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On 05/21/2010 12:08 PM, Keith wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:49:58 -0700 (PDT), Scott wrote: interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. These emails are quite confusing http://www.livestrong.com/teamradios...g-allegations/ What I don't understand is that they think that revealing that Landis was "blackmailing them" (can't really see any trace of that in the emails, but let's assume he was) is going to help them avoid discussing the facts at hand ? Something Landis has apparently been doing with USADA (and obtaining immunity in the process?) ? You don't understand how these investigations work. Once the Feds get their hands on this, it'll lead to another piece of evidence and another. Things look bad for Landis. I guess that by this time next week, he'll be indicted for being Julie Andrews. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On May 21, 2:20*pm, Amit Ghosh wrote:
On May 21, 2:49*pm, Scott wrote: interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. dumbass, blackmailing someone only works if you have real dirt on them. if landis is telling the truth, there is nothing illegal about it. Amit, You've got that 100% wrong. Blackmailing - even when it's the truth is still an illegal act that has criminal and civil liabilities. Blackmailing involves the promise to not publically disclose truthful information that otherwise would be legally or normally allowed. I believe you're thinking of slander and libel where 'truth is an absolute defense' |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:49:42 -0700 (PDT), Anton Berlin
wrote: On May 21, 2:20Êpm, Amit Ghosh wrote: On May 21, 2:49Êpm, Scott wrote: interesting reading, take a look at the email trail. http://www.livestrong.com/teamradioshack/ Yeah, Landis seems credible alright. dumbass, blackmailing someone only works if you have real dirt on them. if landis is telling the truth, there is nothing illegal about it. Amit, You've got that 100% wrong. Blackmailing - even when it's the truth is still an illegal act that has criminal and civil liabilities. Yeah, but that's not going to make the facts go away, right ? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Shack statements
On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:20:33 -0700 (PDT), Amit Ghosh
wrote: blackmailing someone only works if you have real dirt on them. if landis is telling the truth, there is nothing illegal about it. Timed well, a false charge could wreak havoc, like timing it so it effects the Tour de France selection with insufficient time to prove or disprove the allegation. With the few years LA has left to race before he turns 50, missing a Tour could be devastating. Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on two wheels... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Shack - new kit | cycledogg | Racing | 3 | December 4th 09 08:46 PM |
Hincapie going to The Shack | Jason Spaceman[_2_] | Racing | 15 | August 15th 09 02:14 PM |
Chapman: One Of Many Ridiculous Statements | Nuxx Bar | UK | 18 | July 31st 08 03:04 AM |
In the News: Cyclists to give witness statements in Spanish probe | [email protected] | Racing | 1 | December 1st 06 06:35 PM |
Advocacy Statements to the Max | oilfreeandhappy | Marketplace | 0 | March 4th 06 07:40 AM |