Clydesdale Riding<-- What's that???

He might well be extremely underweight, especially considering at least 100
lbs of that weight is in his big dense head.


Damn good point.

-Andrew

"Bob M" wrote in message
news snip
The purpose of biking should be fun -- that's why I ride a mountain bike,
to have fun. To see someone calling me fat simply because I don't meet
their height/weight definition irks me. Even though I'll never be a great
rider because I'm too damn heavy due the muscle mass I'm carrying, I enjoy
riding. I just don't like labels.

So, I think we're on the same page -- as long as you enjoy riding your
bike, who gives a crap? I don't -- except when I'm being labeled by
someone.

--
Bob M in CT
Remove 'x.' to reply

Agreed, have a great ride today!
--
Craig Brossman, Durango Colorado
(remove .nospam. if replying)

B a r r y B u r k e J r . Keep it in the kyou spake
thusly on or about Thu, 10 Jul 2003 21:31:16 UTC

- Did you ride at that time? Was all that extra muscle on the upper
- body a detriment? Did you ever go swimming with the 3% composition?
- Did you sink? G

I have never been a Class rider but yep i was riding. I have no idea when I
learned to ride but I was riding in paris in 66/67 before they booted nato.
I suppose I had a big wind drag and extra weight but I never came home
last in a century ride.

Sinking wise i can still stand on the bottom of the deep end but at that
time i could stretch out along the bottom and any stroke that called for me
to stay near the surface was much harder.

--
I hurt before the ride so fibro gives me a head
start on the rest of the pack. silver lining?

Snyperx wrote:
I am just getting back into riding after a long hiatous and was wonder
what kind fo riding is Clydesdale Riding??? I have been shopping for
some new Rims and I saw a few that were suited for this kind fo riding.
Anyone care to explain? Thanks.


Snyperx


Think light.

John Spann