|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Bikers Prefer to Attack Me, Rather than Discuss the Harmthat Mountain Biking Does!
On Jul 22, 10:26*pm, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:
wrote in message ... Once again...I obviously did say something...you listened and responded. I forgot to mention you're an asshole! You could be right about my personal attributes, but I directed my comments to Mike not you, so I'm not sure why you are taking aim at me He's not taking aim at you Jeff, he just doesn't "quote" too often. He's responding to Vandemans "Did you say something?" reply. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-environmentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
Siskuwihane wrote:
On Jul 22, 8:23 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:14:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 20, 10:37 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts You are not qualified to settle the matter. Yes, I am. Any science Ph.D. certifies expertise in the scientific method. You aren't even qualified to judge who is qualified. I AM. You can't even grasp the rhythm method let alone the scientific method. Neither could his parents apparently. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia "People who had no mercy will find none." - Anon. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Bikers Prefer to Attack Me, Rather than Discuss theHarm that Mountain Biking Does!
Jeff Strickland wrote:
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ... It's a sure sign that they can't defend their selfish, destructive, disgusting sport with any FACTS or LOGIC! Mike OR, it's a sign that you make a very weak argument to support your agenda, and we are growing weary of listening to you spew the same pack of lies year after year. I, for one, have shown that your agenda to close bike routes (if 100% successful) would save only 0.004% of the habitat they pass through. Hardly an effort in preservation that covers the cost. I doubt you could ever be 100% effective, since you have not been effective so far in getting anything done so far. I believe that Mikey has actually been effective in getting more people into mountain biking. I know his posts get me to thinking I need to get out on the trails on my bike more often. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia "People who had no mercy will find none." - Anon. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Jul 22, 8:23 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:14:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 20, 10:37 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts You are not qualified to settle the matter. Yes, I am. Any science Ph.D. certifies expertise in the scientific method. You aren't even qualified to judge who is qualified. I AM. Then why don't you do some science, Mike...rather than spouting your point of view in exceptionally biased opinion papers you claim as "literature reviews." There is no new material in what you post (i.e. you haven't done your own research) and the only thing you seem to put forward is personal opinion (using generalizations and emotionally charged wording) on work that has been done. If you, as you imply, have the expertise in the scientific method and claim that all the other researchers have done their research or analyses wrong, why don't you get some funding and do a proper, defensible study and then get it published in a proper scientific journal like other people who are qualified in the scientific method. Oh but wait...that might not work for you. Can you stretch a psychology degree and specialization in psychometrics (as well as cooking) to an experimental design, physical assessment and analysis with draws from ecology, forestry, biology, engineering, geology, hydrology and other such fields? Seems to me to be a little out of your area of expertise. I personally would side with Siskuwihane on this one....I don't believe you are qualified to settle this matter. Michael Halliwell |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Bikers Prefer to Attack Me, Rather than Discuss the Harm that Mountain Biking Does!
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:48:18 -0500, Tom Sherman
wrote: Jeff Strickland wrote: "Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ... It's a sure sign that they can't defend their selfish, destructive, disgusting sport with any FACTS or LOGIC! Mike OR, it's a sign that you make a very weak argument to support your agenda, and we are growing weary of listening to you spew the same pack of lies year after year. I, for one, have shown that your agenda to close bike routes (if 100% successful) would save only 0.004% of the habitat they pass through. Hardly an effort in preservation that covers the cost. I doubt you could ever be 100% effective, since you have not been effective so far in getting anything done so far. I believe that Mikey has actually been effective in getting more people into mountain biking. I know his posts get me to thinking I need to get out on the trails on my bike more often. Proving that Ed Dolan is right: you are a complete idiot. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:10:53 GMT, "M. Halliwell"
templetagteam@shawdotca wrote: On Jul 22, 8:23 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:14:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 20, 10:37 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts You are not qualified to settle the matter. Yes, I am. Any science Ph.D. certifies expertise in the scientific method. You aren't even qualified to judge who is qualified. I AM. Then why don't you do some science, Mike...rather than spouting your point of view in exceptionally biased opinion papers you claim as "literature reviews." There is no new material in what you post (i.e. you haven't done your own research) and the only thing you seem to put forward is personal opinion (using generalizations and emotionally charged wording) on work that has been done. If you, as you imply, have the expertise in the scientific method and claim that all the other researchers have done their research or analyses wrong, why don't you get some funding and do a proper, defensible study and then get it published in a proper scientific journal like other people who are qualified in the scientific method. Oh but wait...that might not work for you. Can you stretch a psychology degree and specialization in psychometrics (as well as cooking) to an experimental design, physical assessment and analysis with draws from ecology, forestry, biology, engineering, geology, hydrology and other such fields? Seems to me to be a little out of your area of expertise. I personally would side with Siskuwihane on this one....I don't believe you are qualified to settle this matter. Michael Halliwell How would you know, not being qualified to judge. What are your qualifications? This should be good! -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Bikers Prefer to Attack Me, Rather than Discuss the Harmthat Mountain Biking Does!
Mikey...
Yes, I am. Any science Ph.D. certifies expertise in the scientific method. You aren't even qualified to judge who is qualified. I AM. Are you lying again? haha...science PHD...come on now...food science doesn't count. You might be right up there with Emeril but scientifically qualified you are not. And yes. We are qualified to judge. You judge without any knowledge all the time. we can read all your posts and see the twists and turns of your wording and your avoidance and hiding all the time. then again, that is the mind of a sociopath. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:10:53 GMT, "M. Halliwell" templetagteam@shawdotca wrote: On Jul 22, 8:23 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:14:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 20, 10:37 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts You are not qualified to settle the matter. Yes, I am. Any science Ph.D. certifies expertise in the scientific method. You aren't even qualified to judge who is qualified. I AM. Then why don't you do some science, Mike...rather than spouting your point of view in exceptionally biased opinion papers you claim as "literature reviews." There is no new material in what you post (i.e. you haven't done your own research) and the only thing you seem to put forward is personal opinion (using generalizations and emotionally charged wording) on work that has been done. If you, as you imply, have the expertise in the scientific method and claim that all the other researchers have done their research or analyses wrong, why don't you get some funding and do a proper, defensible study and then get it published in a proper scientific journal like other people who are qualified in the scientific method. Oh but wait...that might not work for you. Can you stretch a psychology degree and specialization in psychometrics (as well as cooking) to an experimental design, physical assessment and analysis with draws from ecology, forestry, biology, engineering, geology, hydrology and other such fields? Seems to me to be a little out of your area of expertise. I personally would side with Siskuwihane on this one....I don't believe you are qualified to settle this matter. Michael Halliwell How would you know, not being qualified to judge. What are your qualifications? This should be good! You've been told them before (I could quote you and tell you to "do your own homework"). But as you seem to have a very short memory: B.Sc. in Civil Engineering M.Eng. in Environmental Engineering CESA - Certified Environmental Site Assessor and a lot of years of experience in the assessment of both natural and developed areas for human impacts and environmental health. I also work as part of a multi-disciplinary team that includes ecologists, biologist, engineers, geologists, hydrogeologists, foresters, agrologists, chemists and environmental scientists (at varying levels, but generally from M.Sc. to Ph.D.). I am sure you will disagree, but I think my qualifications are more directly applicable than your Ph.D. in psychology and "passion" for biology and "peeve" of habitat destruction. Michael Halliwell |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Mountain Bikers Prefer to Attack Me, Rather than Discuss the Harm that Mountain Biking Does!
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:43:58 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: Mikey... Yes, I am. Any science Ph.D. certifies expertise in the scientific method. You aren't even qualified to judge who is qualified. I AM. Are you lying again? haha...science PHD...come on now...food science doesn't count. Your middle name is "Liar". You might be right up there with Emeril but scientifically qualified you are not. And yes. We are qualified to judge. List your qualification(s). You judge without any knowledge all the time. we can read all your posts and see the twists and turns of your wording and your avoidance and hiding all the time. then again, that is the mind of a sociopath. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Pseudo-enviromentalist Not Qualified To Make Any Conclusions.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:21:29 GMT, "M. Halliwell"
templetagteam@shawdotca wrote: Mike Vandeman wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:10:53 GMT, "M. Halliwell" templetagteam@shawdotca wrote: On Jul 22, 8:23 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:14:23 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane wrote: On Jul 20, 10:37 pm, Mike Vandeman wrote: To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts You are not qualified to settle the matter. Yes, I am. Any science Ph.D. certifies expertise in the scientific method. You aren't even qualified to judge who is qualified. I AM. Then why don't you do some science, Mike...rather than spouting your point of view in exceptionally biased opinion papers you claim as "literature reviews." There is no new material in what you post (i.e. you haven't done your own research) and the only thing you seem to put forward is personal opinion (using generalizations and emotionally charged wording) on work that has been done. If you, as you imply, have the expertise in the scientific method and claim that all the other researchers have done their research or analyses wrong, why don't you get some funding and do a proper, defensible study and then get it published in a proper scientific journal like other people who are qualified in the scientific method. Oh but wait...that might not work for you. Can you stretch a psychology degree and specialization in psychometrics (as well as cooking) to an experimental design, physical assessment and analysis with draws from ecology, forestry, biology, engineering, geology, hydrology and other such fields? Seems to me to be a little out of your area of expertise. I personally would side with Siskuwihane on this one....I don't believe you are qualified to settle this matter. Michael Halliwell How would you know, not being qualified to judge. What are your qualifications? This should be good! You've been told them before (I could quote you and tell you to "do your own homework"). But as you seem to have a very short memory: You aren't worth even one good brain cell. B.Sc. in Civil Engineering M.Eng. in Environmental Engineering CESA - Certified Environmental Site Assessor None of these are research degrees. A Ph.D. is a research degree. QED and a lot of years of experience in the assessment of both natural and developed areas for human impacts and environmental health. I also work as part of a multi-disciplinary team that includes ecologists, biologist, engineers, geologists, hydrogeologists, foresters, agrologists, chemists and environmental scientists (at varying levels, but generally from M.Sc. to Ph.D.). I am sure you will disagree, but I think my qualifications are more directly applicable than your Ph.D. in psychology and "passion" for biology and "peeve" of habitat destruction. Michael Halliwell -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Bikers Rat Pack & Threaten Woman for Telling the Truth about Mountain Biking! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 2 | April 2nd 08 05:12 PM |
Mountain Bikers Rat Pack & Threaten Woman for Telling the Truth about Mountain Biking! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 2 | April 2nd 08 05:12 PM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 8 | March 18th 07 06:24 AM |
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 6 | March 16th 07 03:35 AM |
STILL Unrefuted, after15 Months of Mountain Bikers Fuming!: The Impacts of Mountain Biking on Wildlife and People -- A Review of the Literature | di | Mountain Biking | 1 | October 23rd 05 10:09 PM |